Comparison between constructivist and IQ approaches in the assessment of gifted elementary school children;Comparación de los enfoques psicométrico y operatorio en la identificación de alumnos de altas capacidades

Revista Mexicana de Psicologia

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 185-191

  Montero, Juan ^a   Navarro, Jose I ^a   Aguilar, Manuel ^a   Ramiro, Pedro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

Constructivist; Giftedness; Intelligence; IQ tests; Mental attention

Indexed keywords

EID: 42349113728     PISSN: 01856073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aguilar, M., Navarro, J. I., Lopez, J. M., & Alcalde, C. (2002). Pensamiento formal y resolucion de problemas matemáticos. Psicothema, 14, 382-386.
2. Berninger, W. W., & Yates, C. M. (1993). Formal operational thought in the gifted: A post-Piagetian perspective. Roeper Review, 15, 220-224.
3. Carman, C. A., & Margison,J. A. (2006). Relationships among traditional and modern constructs used in identifying gift- edness. Roeper Review, 28, 111-111
4. Carter, K. R., & Kontos, S. (1982). An application of cognitive- developmental theory to the identification of gifted children. Roeper Review, 5, 17-20.
5. Clark, B. (2000). Optimizar el aprendizaje: Identificar, planificar y atender a los niños y jóvenes superdotados y talentosos. Ideation, 20, 13-21.
6. Cohen, L. M. (2006). Conceptual foundations for gifted education: Stock-taking. Roeper Review, 28, 91-110.
7. Cohen, L. M., & Kim, Y. M. (1999). Piaget's equilibration theory and the young gifted child: A balancing act. Roeper Review, 21, 201-206.
8. Feldman, D. H. (1982). A developmental framework for research with gifted children. New Directions for Child Development, 17, 31-45.
9. Gallagher, J. M., & Reid, D. K. (2002). The learning theory of Piaget & Inhelder. Lincoln, NE: Iuniverse.
10. Hervás, R. M. (1999). Estilos instruccionales y de aprendizaje como variables de atencion a la diversidad del superdotado. En M. Prieto (Ed.), Identification, evaluation y atencion a la diversidad del superdotado (pp. 97-120). Malaga: Aljibe.
11. Johnson, J., Pascual-Leone, J., & Irn-Bolter, N. (1999). Testing theories of development in gifted children: Speed of processing, inhibition, and mental attention. Sesión de cartel presentado en la reunion de la Society for Research in Child Development, Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, EE. UU.
12. Johnson, J., Im-Bolter, N., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2003). Development of mental attention in gifted and mainstream children: The role of mental capacity, inhibition, and speed of processing. Child Development, 74, 1594-1614.
13. Lourenco, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103, 143-164.
14. Miller, E. M. (2005). Studying the meaning of giftedness: Inspiration from the field of cognitive psychology. Roeper Review, 27, 172-177.
15. Palacios, J. Cubero, J., Moreno, M., & Valdecantos, C. (1991). Diagnóstico operatorio [video] Sevilla: Servicio de tecnología educativa del ICE de la Universidad de Sevilla.
16. Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). La teoría de los operadores constructivos. En J. Delval (Ed.), Las teorías, los métodos y el desarrollo temprano (Vol. I, pp. 208-227). Madrid: Alianza.
17. Pascual-Leone, J. (2000). Reflections on working memory: Are the two models complementary? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 138-154.
18. Pascual-Leone, J., & Ijaz, H. (1991). Mental capacity testing as form of intellectual-developmental assessment. En R. J. Samuda, S. L. Kong, J. Cummins, J. Pascual-Leone, &J. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 143-171). Toronto: Intercultural Social Science Publications.
19. Pascual-Leone, J., & Billargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161-200.
20. Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. M. (2001). Manual for the FIT: Figural intersections test. Toronto, Canada: Developmental Processes Laboratory, Department of Psychology, York University.
21. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The child's conception of space. New York: W. W. Norton.
22. Planche, P., & Gicquel, M. (2000). The development of format operational functioning in intellectually gifted children. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 219-227.
23. Plucker,J. (2001). Looking back, looking around, looking forward: The impact of intelligence theories on gifted education. Roeper Review, 23, 124-125.
24. Raven, J. C. (1994). Matrices progresives. Oxford: Information Press. Eyusham.
25. Renzulli, J. R. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. En S. M. Baum, S. Reis, & L. R. Maxfield (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 123-168). Mansfield Centre, CT: Creative Learning Press.
26. Renzulli, J. R. (2005). Equity, excellence, and economy in a system for identifying students in gifted education programs: A guidebook. Recuperado en marzo de 2006 de http:// wwv.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/renzulli2.html
27. Ritchhart, R. (2001). From to IC: A dispositional view of intelligence. Roeper Review, 23, 143-150.
28. Santrock, J. W. (2003). Infancia, Madrid: McGraw Hill.
29. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316.
30. Wechsler, D. (1994). Escala de inteligencia Wechsler para niños- revisada, WISC-R (3a. Ed.). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.