Development of Mental Attention in Gifted and Mainstream Children: The Role of Mental Capacity, Inhibition, and Speed of Processing

Child Development

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1594-1614

  Johnson, Janice ^a   Im Bolter, Nancie ^a   Pascual Leone, Juan ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD; COLOR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; GIFTED CHILD; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHILD; CHILD, GIFTED; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0347588081     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00626.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1-37.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851-864.
3. Baillargeon, R., Pascual-Leone, J., & Roncadin, C. (1998). Mental-attentional capacity: Does cognitive style make a difference? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 143-166.
4. Ball, C., Mann, L., & Stamm, C. (1994). Decision-making abilities of intellectually gifted and mainstream children. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46, 13-20.
5. Band, G. P. H., van der Molen, M. W., Overtoom, C. C. E., & Verbaten, M. N. (2000). The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: Separate developmental trends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 263-290.
6. Bauer, S. (2003). The revised Figural Intersection Task (FIT-00): Developmental issues of validity and reliability. Master's thesis, York University, in preparation.
7. Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review, 10, 48-71.
8. Borkowski, J. G., & Peck, V. A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brewer, N. (1987). Processing speed, efficiency, and intelligence. In J. G. Borkowski & J. D. Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 15-48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032-1053.
11. Caropreso, E. J., & White, C. S. (1994). Analogical reasoning and giftedness: A comparison between identified gifted and nonidentified gifted children. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 271-278.
12. Christ, S. E., White, D. A., Mandernach, T., & Keys, B. A. (2001). Inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 653-669.
13. Cohn, S. J., Carlson, J. S., & Jensen, A. R. (1985). Speed of information processing in academically gifted youths. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 621-629.
14. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185.
15. Coyle, T. R., Read, L. E., Gaultney, J. F., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Giftedness and variability in strategic processing on a multitrial memory task: Evidence for stability in gifted cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 273-290.
16. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
17. Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Differential enhancement of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 48-60.
18. Davidson, J. E. (1986). The role of insight in giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 201-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R.J (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64.
20. Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing mechanism. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development: Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 3-27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Durston, S., Thomas, K., Yang, Y., Ulug, A., Zimmerman, R., & Casey, B. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9-F16.
22. Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S., Laughlin, J., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
23. Ferretti, R. P., & Butterfield, E. C. (1992). Intelligence-related differences in the learning, maintenance, and transfer of problem-solving strategies. Intelligence, 16, 207-223.
24. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145-173.
25. Gaultney, J. F., Bjorklund, D. F., & Goldstein, D. (1996). To be young, gifted, and strategic: Advantages for memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 43-66.
26. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
27. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-864.
28. Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). Development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175-204). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Harnishfeger, K. K., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1990). Strategic and nonstrategic factors in gifted children's free recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 346-363.
30. Harnishfeger, K. K., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1993). The ontogeny of inhibition mechanisms: A renewed approach to cognitive development. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development: Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 28-49). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. Harnishfeger, K. K., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1994). A developmental perspective on individual differences in inhibition. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 331-355.
32. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model. Visual Cognition, 3, 119-164.
34. Johnson, J. M., Fabian, V., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). Quantitative hardware stages that constrain language development. Human Development, 32, 245-271.
35. Johnson, J. M., Im-Bolter, N., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2003). Central inhibitory processes: Are they one or many? Manuscript in preparation.
36. Kail, R. (1988). Developmental functions for speeds of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 339-364.
37. Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490-501.
38. Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologies, 86, 199-255.
39. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processes in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491-512.
40. Kranzler, J. H., Whang, P. A., & Jensen, A. R. (1994). Task complexity and the speed and efficiency of elemental informational processing: Another look at the nature of intellectual giftedness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 447-459.
41. Kyllonen, P. C. (2002). G: Knowledge, speed, strategies or working memory capacity? A systems perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence (pp. 415-445). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Lane, D. M., & Peterson, D. A. (1982). The development of selective attention. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28, 331-337.
43. Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59-80.
44. Lorsbach, T. C., & Reimer, J. (1997). Developmental changes in the inhibition of previously relevant information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 317-342.
45. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
46. Miller, R., Pascual-Leone, J., Campbell, C., & Juckes, T. (1989). Cross-cultural similarities and differences on two neo-Piagetian tasks. International Journal of Psychology, 24, 293-313.
47. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1994). Negative priming in a spatial localization task: Feature mismatching and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 624-646.
48. Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
49. Morris, R. D. (1996). Relationships and distinctions among the concepts of attention, memory, and executive function: A developmental perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 11-16). Baltimore: Brookes.
50. Neill, T. W., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Nielson, K. A., Langenecker, S. A., & Garavan, H. (2002). Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 56-71.
52. Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and & working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Review, 126, 220-246.
53. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 63, 301-345.
54. Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). Compounds, confounds and models in developmental information processing: A reply to Trabasso and Foellinger. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 18-40.
55. Pascual-Leone, J. (1984). Attention, dialectic, and mental effort: Towards an organismic theory of life stages. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 182-215). New York: Praeger.
56. Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531-570.
57. Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). Learning and development as dialectical factors in cognitive growth. Human Development, 38, 338-348.
58. Pascual-Leone, J. (1997). Metasubjective processes: The missing "lingua franca" of cognitive science. In D. Johnson, & C. Erneling (Eds.), The future of the cognitive revolution (pp. 75-101). New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Pascual-Leone, J. (1998). To appraise developmental difficulty or mental demand, relational complexity is not enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 843-944.
60. Pascual-Leone, J. (2000). Reflections on working memory: Are the two models complementary? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 138-154.
61. Pascual-Leone, J. (2001). If the magical number is 4, how does one account for operations within working memory? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 136-138.
62. Pascual-Leone, J. (in press). Hidden operators of mental attention applying on LTM give the illusion of a separate working memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
63. Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measure of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161-200.
64. Pascual-Leone, J., Baillargeon, R., Lee, C., & Ho, G. W. (1990). Towards standardization of mental capacity testing. Department of Psychology Report 199, York University, Toronto.
65. Pascual-Leone, J., & Ijaz, H. (1989). Mental capacity testing as a form of intellectual-developmental assessment. In R. Samuda, S. Kong, J. Cummings, J. Pascual-Leone, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 144-171). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.
66. Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. M. (1998, August). Cognition, intelligence and the nature of giftedness, Paper presented at the symposium Cognition and Intelligence, Congresso Internacional Sobre Superdotacao, Brasilia, Brazil.
67. Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. M. (2001). Manual for the FIT: Figurai intersections test. Toronto, Canada: Developmental Processes Laboratory, Department of Psychology, York University.
68. Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Baskind, S., Dworsky, S., & Severtson, E. (2000). Culture-fair assessment and the processes of mental attention. In A. Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (pp. 191-214). New York: Pergamon.
69. Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Bauer, S., & Cunning, S. (2000, July). Mental-attentional measurement in deaf children: Can executive training be used as a control in assessment? In A. Bolotova & S. Leekam (Conveners), Children with disorders. (Poster symposium conducted at the 26th biennial meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Beijing, China.
70. Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Goodman, D., Hameluck, D., & Theodor, L. (1981). I-interruption effects in backward pattern masking: The neglected role of fixation stimuli. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Reams, R., Chamrad, D., & Robinson, N. M. (1990). The race is not necessarily to the swift: Validity of WISC-R bonus points for speed. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 108-110.
72. Reitan, R. M. (1971). Trail Making Test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 575-581.
73. Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test. South Tucson, Arizona: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
74. Rourke, B. P., Bakker, D. J., Fisk, J. L., & Strang, J. D. (1983). Child neuropsychology: An introduction to theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
75. Ruchkin, D. S., Grafman, J., Cameron, K., & Berndt, R. S. (in press) Working memory retention systems: A state of activated long-term memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
76. Saccuzzo, D. P., Johnson, N. E., & Guertin, T. L. (1994). Information processing in gifted versus nongifted African American, Latino, Filipino, and White children: Speeded versus nonspeeded paradigms. Intelligence, 19, 219-243.
77. Schiff, A. R., & Knopf, I. J. (1985). The effects of task demands on attention allocation in children of different ages. Child Development, 56, 621-630.
78. Schofield, N. J., & Ashman, A. F. (1987). The cognitive processing of gifted, high average, and low average ability students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 9-20.
79. Segalowitz, S. J., Unsal, A., & Dywan, J. (1992). Cleverness and wisdom in 12-year-olds: Electrophysiological evidence for late maturation of the frontal lobe. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 279-298.
80. Shilling, V. M., Chetwynd, A., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (2002). Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: An investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults. Neuropsychologia, 40, 605-619.
81. Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative differences in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 167-187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
82. Simone, P. M., & McCormick, E. B. (1999). Effect of a defining feature on negative priming across the life span. Visual Cognition, 6, 587-606.
83. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982, June). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, 37-44.
86. Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
87. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
88. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
89. Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., & Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 353-378.
90. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
91. Tipper, S. P., & McLaren, J. (1990). Evidence of efficient visual selectivity in children. In J. T. Enns (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory (pp. 197-210). North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
92. Tipper, S. P., & Milliken, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibition-based and episodic retrieval-based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 337-363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
93. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
94. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Milliken, B. (1995). Spatial negative priming without mismatching: Comment on Park and Kanwisher (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1220-1229.
95. Torgesen, J. K., Kistner, J. A., & Morgan, S. (1987). Component processes in working memory. In J. G. Borkowski & J. D. Day (Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness (pp. 49-85). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
96. Visser, M., Das-Smaal, E., & Kwakman, H. (1996). Impulsivity and negative priming: Evidence for diminished cognitive inhibition in impulsive children. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 131-140.
97. Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Resnick, J. S., & Frye, D. (1997). Early development of executive function: A problem-solving framework. Review of General Psychology, 1, 1-29.