Evidence for automatic on-line adjustments of hand orientation during natural reaching movements to stationary targets

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1653-1671

  Gosselin Kessiby, N ^a   Messier, J ^a,b   Kalaska, J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LIGHT EMITTING DIODE; MALE; MEDICAL ERROR; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 42249098738     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00980.2007     Document Type: Article

References (146)

1. Arbib M. Perceptual structures and distributed motor control. In: Handbook of Physiology. The Nervous System. Motor Control, edited by Brooks V. Bethesda, MD: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1981, sect. 1, vol. 2 p. 1449-1480.
2. Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Fookson O, Poizner H. Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation. J Neurophysiol 79: 2833-2846, 1998.
3. Appelle S. Visual and haptic angle perception in the matching task. Am J Psychol 84: 487-499, 1971.
4. Appelle S, Countryman M. Eliminating the haptic oblique effect: influence of scanning incongruity and prior knowledge of the standards. Perception 15: 325-329, 1986.
5. Bagesteiro LB, Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL. Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Exp Brain Res 171: 358-370, 2006.
6. Bard C, Turrell Y, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Lamarre Y, Martin O. Deaf-ferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Exp Brain Res 125: 410-416, 1999.
7. Battaglia-Mayer A, Archambault PS, Caminiti R. The cortical network for eye-hand coordination and its relevance to understanding motor disorders of parietal patients. Neuropsychologia 44: 2607-2620, 2006.
8. Berkinblit MB, Fookson OI, Smetanin B, Adamovich SV, Poizner H. The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets. Exp Brain Res 107: 326-330, 1995.
9. Blouin J, Bard C, Teasdale N, Paillard J, Fleury M, Forget R, Lamarre Y. Reference systems for coding spatial information in normal subjects and a deafferented patient. Exp Brain Res 93: 324-331, 1993.
10. Blouin J, Gauthier GM, Vercher JL, Cole J. The relative contribution of retinal and extraretinal signals in determining the accuracy of reaching movements in normal subjects and a deafferented patient. Exp Brain Res 109: 148-153, 1996.
11. Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Zaal FT. The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Exp Brain Res 98: 535-541, 1994.
12. Bridgeman B, Genmer A, Forsman T, Huemer V. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Res 40: 3539-3552, 2000.
13. Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29: 336-342, 1981.
14. Carrozzo M, McIntyre J, Zago M, Lacquaniti F. Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 129: 201-210, 1999.
15. Connolly JD, Goodale MA. The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension. Exp Brain Res 125: 281-286, 1999.
16. Cuijpers RH, Kappers AM, Koenderink JJ. Large systematic deviations in visual parallelism. Perception 29: 1467-1482, 2000.
17. Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A. The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 44: 2668-2684, 2006.
18. Darling WG, Miller GF. Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations. Exp Brain Res 93: 534-547, 1993.
19. Day BL, Lyon IN. Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 130: 159-168, 2000.
20. Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2: 563-567, 1999.
21. Desmurget M, Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 423-431, 2000.
22. Desmurget M, Grea H, Grethe JS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci 21: 2919-2928, 2001.
23. Desmurget M, Grea H, Prablanc C. Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 119: 511-516, 1998.
24. Desmurget M, Prablanc C. Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements. J Neurophysiol 77: 452-464, 1997.
25. Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Arzi M, Rossetti Y, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 110: 265-278, 1996.
26. Desmurget M, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Russo GS, Alexander GE, Grafton ST. Updating target location at the end of an orienting saccade affects the characteristics of simple point-to-point movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31: 1510-1536, 2005.
27. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EH. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 30: 189-201, 2007.
28. Dyde RT, Milner AD. Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time. Exp Brain Res 144: 518-527, 2002.
29. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433, 2002.
30. Fan J, He J, Tillery SI. Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp. Exp Brain Res 171: 283-296, 2006.
31. Fiehler K, Burke M, Engel A, Bien S, Rösler F. Kinesthetic working memory and action control within the dorsal stream. Cereb Cortex 18: 243-253, 2008.
32. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
33. Fukui T, Inui T. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping. Hum Mov Sci 25: 349-371, 2006.
34. Gentaz E, Hatwell Y. The haptic "oblique effect" in children's and adults' perception of orientation. Perception 24: 631-646, 1995.
35. Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umilta C, Rizzolatti G. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 29: 361-378, 1991.
36. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M, Saetti MC, Toni I. On orienting the hand to reach and grasp an object. Neuroreport 7: 589-592, 1996.
37. Geyer S, Matelli M, Luppino G, Zilles K. Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system. Anat Embryol 202: 443-474, 2000.
38. Ghez C, Sainburg R. Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73: 273-284, 1995.
39. Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF. Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. J Neurophysiol 73: 361-372, 1995.
40. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 27: 3-78, 2004.
41. Glover SR, Dixon P. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 560-572, 2001a.
42. Glover S, Dixon P. The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Can J Exp Psychol 55: 96-103, 2001b.
43. Glover S, Dixon P. Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Exp Brain Res 137: 254-258, 2001c.
44. Goodale MA. Different spaces and different times for perception and action. Prog Brain Res 134: 313-331, 2001.
45. Goodale MA, Kroliczak G, Westwood DA. Dual routes to action: contributions of the dorsal and ventral streams to adaptive behavior. Prog Brain Res 149: 269-283, 2005.
46. Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15: 20-25, 1992.
47. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349: 154-166, 1991.
48. Goodale MA, Pélisson D, Prablanc C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320: 748-750, 1986.
49. Goodale MA, Westwood DA. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14: 203-211, 2004.
50. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99: 112-130, 1994a.
51. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99: 97-111, 1994b.
52. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors. J Neurophysiol 73: 347-360, 1995.
53. Gosselin-Kessiby N, Messier J, Kalaska JF. Perception and control of spatial orientation of the hand in normal and blind subjects. Soc Neurosci Abstr 597.14, 2003.
54. Gosselin-Kessiby N, Messier J, Kalaska JF. Control of spatial orientation of the hand during reaching movements. Soc Neurosci Abstr 68.10, 2004.
55. Grea H, Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Tilikete C, Grafton S, Prablanc C, Vighetto A. A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements. Neuropsychologia 40: 2471-2480, 2002.
56. Gritsenko V, Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF. Afferent input, efference copy, signal noise and biases in perception of joint angle during active versus passive elbow movements. J Neurophysiol 98: 1140-1154, 2007.
57. Haffenden AM, Goodale MA. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10: 122-136, 1998.
58. Hagura N, Takei T, Hirose S, Aramaki Y, Matsumura M, Sadato N, Naito E. Activity in the posterior parietal cortex mediates visual dominance over kinesthesia. J Neurosci 27: 7047-7053, 2007.
59. Hermens F, Gielen S. Visual and haptic matching of perceived orientations of lines. Perception 32: 235-248, 2003.
60. Hermens F, Kappers AM, Gielen SC. The structure of frontoparallel haptic space is task dependent. Percept Psychophys 68: 62-75, 2006.
61. Hu Y, Eagleson R, Goodale MA. The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Exp Brain Res 126: 109-116, 1999.
62. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86: 199-208, 1991.
63. Jeannerod M. Specialized channels for cognitive responses. Cognition 10: 135-137, 1981.
64. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16: 235-254, 1984.
65. Jeannerod M. Visuomotor channels: their integration in goal-directed prehension. Human Movement Science 18: 201-218, 1999.
66. Jeannerod M, Paulignan Y, Weiss P. Grasping an object: one movement, several components. Novartis Found Symp 218: 5-16, 1998.
67. Kaas AL, Mier HI. Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space. Exp Brain Res 170: 403-413, 2006.
68. Kappers AM. Large systematic deviations in the haptic perception of parallelity. Perception 28: 1001-1012, 1999.
69. Kappers AM. Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane. Acta Psychol 109: 25-40, 2002.
70. Kappers AM. Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors. Acta Psychol 114: 131-145, 2003.
71. Kappers AM. The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks. Acta Psychol 117: 333-340, 2004.
72. Kappers AM, Koenderink JJ. Haptic perception of spatial relations. Perception 28: 781-795, 1999.
73. Kappers AM, Viergever RF. Hand orientation is insufficiently compensated for in haptic spatial perception. Exp Brain Res 173: 407-414, 2006.
74. Knill DC, Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27: 712-719, 2004.
75. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 319-326, 2006.
76. Ma-Wyatt A, McKee SP. Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision. Exp Brain Res 179: 56-74, 2007.
77. Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF. Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task. J Neurosci 2: 399-408, 1982.
78. Mamassian P. Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 114: 235-245, 1997.
79. Marotta JJ, Medendorp WP, Crawford JD. Kinematic rules for upper and lower arm contributions to grasp orientation. J Neurophysiol 90: 3816-3827, 2003.
80. Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, Mackenzie CL, Athenes S. Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Move Sci 9: 149-176, 1990.
81. Marteniuk RG, Mackenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41: 365-378, 1987.
82. Messier J, Kalaska JF. Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125: 139-152, 1999.
83. Messier J, Adamovich S, Berkinblit M, Tunik E, Poizner H. Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject. Exp Brain Res 150: 399-416, 2003.
84. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.
85. Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. Selectivity for the shape, size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 83: 2580-2601, 2000.
86. Nougier V, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Cole J, Forget R, Paillard J, Lamarre Y. Control of single-joint movements in deafferented patients: evidence for amplitude coding rather than position control. Exp Brain Res 109: 473-482, 1996.
87. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
88. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res 79: 431-435, 1990.
89. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M. Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. I. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83: 502-512, 1991.
90. Pélisson D, Prablanc C, Goodale MA, Jeannerod M. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp Brain Res 62: 303-311, 1986.
91. Perenin MT, Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 111: 643-674, 1988.
92. Prablanc C, Desmurget M, Grea H. Neural control of on-line guidance of hand reaching movements. Prog Brain Res 142: 155-170, 2003.
93. Prablanc C, Martin O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67: 455-469, 1992.
94. Prablanc C, Pélisson D, Goodale MA. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res 62: 293-302, 1986.
95. Redon C, Hay L, Velay JL. Proprioceptive control of goal-directed movements in man, studied by means of vibratory muscle tendon stimulation. J Mot Behav 23: 101-108, 1991.
96. Rice NJ, Tunik E, Grafton ST. The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: new insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 26: 8176-8182, 2006.
97. Rice NJ, Valyear KF, Goodale MA, Milner AD, Culham JC. Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: an fMRI adaptation study. Neuroimage 36, Suppl 2: T87-T93, 2007.
98. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G. The cortical motor system. Neuron 27: 889-901, 2001.
99. Roby-Brami A, Bennis N, Mokhtari M, Baraduc P. Hand orientation for grasping depends on the direction of the reaching movement. Brain Res 869: 121-129, 2000.
100. Roby-Brami A, Jacobs S, Bennis N, Levin MF. Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients. Brain Res 969: 217-229, 2003.
101. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C. Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J Neurophysiol 74: 457-463, 1995.
102. Sarlegna F, Blouin J, Bresciani JP, Bourdin C, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM. Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Exp Brain Res 151: 524-535, 2003.
103. Sarlegna F, Blouin J, Vercher JL, Bresciani JP, Bourdin C, Gauthier GM. Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 157: 468-471, 2004.
104. Saunders JA, Knill DC. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152: 341-352, 2003.
105. Saunders JA, Knill DC. Visual feedback control of hand movements. J Neurosci 24: 3223-3234, 2004.
106. Saunders JA, Knill DC. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 162: 458-473, 2005.
107. Schenk T, Mai N. Time constraints improve reaching movements in an ataxic patient. Exp Brain Res 128: 214-218, 1999.
108. Schenk T, Schindler I, McIntosh RD, Milner AD. The use of visual feedback is independent of visual awareness: evidence from visual extinction. Exp Brain Res 167: 95-102, 2005.
109. Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Poizner H. Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping. Exp Brain Res 151: 158-166, 2003.
110. Sheth BR, Shimojo S. How the lack of visuomotor feedback affects even the early stages of goal-directed pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 143: 181-190, 2002.
111. Shmuelof L, Zohary E. Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 47: 457- 470, 2005.
112. Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CC. The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity to the control of slow and fast human forearm movements. Exp Brain Res 67: 33-40, 1987.
113. Smeets JB, Brenner E, Biegstraaten M. Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping. Behav Brain Res 136: 427-432, 2002.
114. Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DD, van Beers RJ, Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18781-18786, 2006.
115. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23: 6982-6992, 2003.
116. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8: 490-497, 2005.
117. Soechting JF, Flanders M. Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. J Neurophysiol 70: 1137-1150, 1993.
118. Soechting JF, Ross B. Psychophysical determination of coordinate representation of human arm orientation. Neuroscience 13: 595-604, 1984.
119. Steinman RM, Kowler E, Collewijn H. New directions for oculomotor research. Vision Res 30: 1845-1864, 1990.
120. Stelmach GE, Castiello U, Jeannerod M. Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements. J Mot Behav 26: 178-186, 1994.
121. Steyvers M, Verschueren SM, Levin O, Ouamer M, Swinnen SP. Proprioceptive control of cyclical bimanual forearm movements across different movement frequencies as revealed by means of tendon vibration. Exp Brain Res 140: 326-334, 2001.
122. Supuk T, Kodek T, Bajd T. Estimation of hand preshaping during human grasping. Med Eng Phys 27: 790-797, 2005.
123. Tillery SI, Flanders M, Soechting JF. A coordinate system for the synthesis of visual and kinesthetic information. J Neurosci 11: 770-778, 1991.
124. Tillery SI, Ebner TJ, Soechting JF. Task dependence of primate arm postures. Exp Brain Res 104: 1-11, 1995.
125. Torres EB, Zipser D. Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. J Neurophysiol 88: 2355-2367, 2002.
126. Torres EB, Zipser D. Simultaneous control of hand displacements and rotations in orientation-matching experiments. J Appl Physiol 96: 1978-1987, 2004.
127. Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton ST. Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8: 505-511, 2005.
128. Turrell Y, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Martin O. Corrective loops involved in fast aiming movements: effect of task and environment. Exp Brain Res 120: 41-51, 1998.
129. Valyear KF, Culham JC, Sharif N, Westwood D, Goodale MA. A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: a human fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44: 218-228, 2006.
130. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information. Exp Brain Res 111: 253-261, 1996.
131. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ. The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122: 367-377, 1998.
132. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81: 1355-1364, 1999.
133. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002.
134. van Sonderen JF, Gielen CC, Denier van der Gon JJ. Motor programmes for goal-directed movements are continuously adjusted according to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 78: 139-146, 1989.
135. van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJ. Catching and matching bars with different orientations. Acta Psychol 120: 288-306, 2005.
136. Vercher JL, Sares F, Blouin J, Bourdin C, Gauthier G. Role of sensory information in updating internal models of the effector during arm tracking. Prog Brain Res 142: 203-222, 2003.
137. Verschueren SM, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV. Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: unimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res 127: 171-181, 1999.
138. Volcic R, Kappers AM, Koenderink JJ. Haptic parallelity perception on the frontoparallel plane: the involvement of reference frames. Percept Psychophys 69: 276-286, 2007.
139. Wallace SA, Weeks DL. Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement. J Mot Behav 20: 81-105, 1988.
140. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98: 153-156, 1994.
141. Young RP, Zelaznik HN. The visual control of aimed hand movements to stationary and moving targets. Acta Psychol 79: 59-78, 1992.
142. Zaal FT, Bootsma RJ. Accuracy demands in natural prehension. Human Movement Science 12: 339-345, 1993.
143. Zaal FT, Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PC. Coordination in prehension. Information-based coupling of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res 119: 427-435, 1998.
144. Zelaznik HZ, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L. Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Mot Behav 15: 217-236, 1983.
145. Zuidhoek S, Kappers AM, van der Lubbe RH, Postma A. Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task. Exp Brain Res 149: 320-330, 2003.
146. Zuidhoek S, Visser A, Bredero ME, Postma A. Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception. Exp Brain Res 157: 265-268, 2004.