Kinesthetic working memory and action control within the dorsal stream

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 243-253

  Fiehler, Katja ^a   Burke, Michael ^a   Engel, Annerose ^a   Bien, Siegfried ^a   Rösler, Frank ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Haptic; Human fMRI; Intraparietal sulcus; Perception and action; Primary somatosensory cortex; Sensorimotor transformation

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; RECOGNITION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TOUCH;

EID: 38849174354     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhm071     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E. 2001. Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat Neuroscience. 4:324-330.
2. Andersen RA, Asanuma C, Essick G, Siegel RM. 1990. Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule. J Comp Neurol. 296:65-113.
3. Binkofski F, Buccino G, Posse S, Seitz R J, Rizzolatti G, Freund H-J. 1999. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur J Neurosci. 11:3276-3286.
4. Binkofski F, Kunesch E, Classen J, Seitz RJ, Freund H-J. 2001. Tactile apraxia: Unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain. 124:132-144.
5. Bledowski C, Cohen Kadosh K, Wibral M, Rahm B, Bittner RA, Hoechstetter K, Scherg M, Maurer K, Goebel R, Linden DE. 2006. Mental chronometry of working memory retrieval: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials approach. J Neurosci. 26:821-829.
6. Bodegard A, Geyer S, Grefkes C, Zilles K, Roland PE. 2001. Hierarchical processing of tactile shape in the human brain. Neuron. 31:317-328.
7. Bodegard A, Geyer S, Herath P, Grefkes C, Zilles K, Roland PE. 2003. Somatosensory areas engaged during discrimination of steady pressure spring strength and kinesthesia. Hum Brain Mapp. 20:103-115.
8. Brett M, Anton J-L, Valabregue R, Poline J-B. 2002. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain ; 2002 Jun; Sendai (Japan). Neuroimage [CD-ROM]. 16:2.
9. Burton H. 2002. Cerebral cortical regions devoted to the somatosensory system: Results from brain imaging studies in humans. In: Nelson RJ, editor. The somatosensory system. Chapter 2. London: CRC Press.
10. Choi HJ, Zilles K, Mohlberg H, Schleicher A, Fink G R, Armstrong E, Amunts K. 2006. Cytoarchitectonic identification and probabilistic mapping of two distinct areas within the anterior ventral bank of the human intraparietal sulcus. J Comp Neurol. 495:53-69.
11. Connolly JD, Andersen RA, Goodale MA. 2003. FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain. Exp Brain Res. 153:140-145.
12. Curtis CE. 2006. Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory. Neuroscience. 139:173-180.
13. Desmurget M, Grafton S. 2000. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci. 4:423-431.
14. Dijkerman HC, DeHaan EHF. Forthcoming. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci.
15. Easton RD, Srinivas K, Greene AJ. 1997. Do vision and haptics share common representations? Implicit and explicit memory within and between modalities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 23:153-163.
16. Eickhoff SB, Schleicher A, Zilles K, Amunts K 2006. The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. Cereb Cortex 16:254-267.
17. Eickhoff SB, Amunts K, Mohlberg H, Zilles K. 2006. The human parietal operculum. II. Stereotaxic maps and correlation with functional imaging results. Cereb Cortex 16:268-279.
18. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, Zilles K. 2005. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25:1325-1335.
19. Fiehler K, Engel A, Rösler F. Forthcoming. Where are somatosensory representations stored and reactivated? Behav Brain Sci.
20. Friston K J, Fletcher P, Josephs O, Holmes A, Rugg MD, Turner R. 1998. Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses. Neuroimage. 7:30-40.
21. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SC, Frackowiak RS, Turner R. 1995. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage. 2:45-53.
22. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehe ricy S, Poline J-B, Gaymard B, Marsault C, Agid Y, Le Bihan D. 2000. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex. 10:1093-1104.
23. Geyer S, Schleicher A, Zilles K. 1999. Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of human primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage. 10:63-83.
24. Geyer S, Schormann T, Mohlberg H, Zilles K. 2000. Areas 3a, 3b, and 1 of human primary somatosensory cortex. Part 2. Spatial normalization to standard anatomical space. Neuroimage. 11:684-696.
25. Gibson JJ. 1966. The senses considered as conceptual systems. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin.
26. Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Keillor JM. 1994. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia. 32:1159-1178.
27. Goodale MA, Milner AD. 1992. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15:20-25.
28. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. 1991. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature. 349:154-156.
29. Goodale MA, Westwood DA. 2004. An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 14:203-211.
30. Grefkes C, Geyer S, Schormann T, Roland P, Zilles K. 2001. Human somatosensory area 2: observer-independent cytoarchitectonic mapping interindividual variability and population map. Neuroimage. 14:617-631.
31. Grefkes C, Weiss PH, Zilles K, Fink GR. 2002. Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron. 35:173-184.
32. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. 1999. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron. 24:187-203.
33. Harrington DL, Rao SM, Haaland KY, Bobholz JA, Mayer AR, Binder JR, Cox RW. 2000. Specialized neural systems underlying representations of sequential movements. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:56-77.
34. Himmelbach M, Karnath HO. 2005. Dorsal and ventral stream interaction: contributions from optic ataxia. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:632-640.
35. Hummel F, Kirsammer R, Gerloff C. 2003. Ipsilateral cortical activation during finger sequences of increasing complexity: representation of movement difficulty or memory load? Clin Neurophysiol. 114: 605-613.
36. James TW, Culham J, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2003. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. Brain. 126:2463-2475.
37. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2002. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia. 40:1706-1714.
38. Jäncke L, Kleinschmidt A, Mirzazade S, Shah NJ, Freund H-J. 2001. The role of the inferior parietal cortex in linking the tactile perception and manual construction of object shapes. Cereb Cortex. 11:114-121.
39. Jeannerod M, Decety J, Michel F. 1994. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia. 32:369-380.
40. Johansson RS, Hager C, Backstrom L. 1992. Somatosensory control of precision grip during unpredictable pulling loads. III. Impairments during digital anesthesia. Exp Brain Res. 89:204-213.
41. Jones EG, Powell TP. 1969. Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. I. Ipsilateral cortical connexions. Brain. 92:477-502.
42. Kaas A, van Mier H, Goebel R. Forthcoming. The neural correlates of human working memory for haptically explored object orientations. Cereb Cortex. Advance Access published September 11, 2006, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl074.
43. Killackey HP, Gould HJ 3rd, Cusick CG, Pons TP, Kaas JH. 1983. The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of new and old world monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 219:384-419.
44. Lacquaniti F, Guigon E, Bianchi L, Ferraina S, Caminiti R. 1995. Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 5:391-409.
45. Lacquaniti F, Perani D, Guigon E, Bettinardi V, Carrozzo M, Grassi F, Rossetti Y, Fazio F. 1997. Visuomotor transformations for reaching to memorized targets: a PET study. Neuroimage. 5:129-146.
46. Lewis JW, Van Essen DC. 2000. Corticocortical connections of visual sensorimotor and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 428:112-137.
47. Luppino G, Murata A, Govoni P, Matelli M. 1999. Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Exp Brain Res. 128:181-187.
48. Macaluso E, Driver J, Frith CD. 2003. Multimodal spatial representations engaged in human parietal cortex during both saccadic and manual spatial orienting. Curr Biol. 13:990-999.
49. Malach R, Reppas JB, Benson RR, Kwong KK, Jiang H, Kennedy WA, Ledden PJ, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Tootell RB. 1995. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:8135-8139.
50. Mountcastle VB, Lynch JC, Georgopoulos A, Sakata H, Acuna C. 1975. Posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey: command functions for operations within extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol. 38:871-908.
51. Murata A, Gallese V, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 1996. Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. J Neurophysiol. 75:2180-2186.
52. Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H. 2000. Selectivity for the shape size and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol. 83:2580-2601.
53. Naito E, Ehrsson HH. 2006. Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 26:3783-3790.
54. Naito E, Roland PE, Grefkes C, Choi HJ, Eickhoff S, Geyer S, Zilles K, Ehrsson HH. 2005. Dominance of the right hemisphere and role of area 2 in human kinesthesia. J Neurophysiol. 93:1020-1034.
55. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
56. Orban GA, Claeys K, Nelissen K, Smans R, Sunaert S, Todd JT, Wardak C, Durand JB, Vanduffel W. 2006. Mapping the parietal cortex of human and non-human primates. Neuropsychologia. 44:2647-2667.
57. Pandya DN, Kuypers HG. 1969. Cortico-cortical connections in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 13:13-36.
58. Picard N, Strick PL. 1996. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex. 6:342-353.
59. Picard N, Strick PL. 2001. Imaging the premotor areas. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11:663-672.
60. Postle BR, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M. 2000. Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. Brain Res Protoc. 5:57-66.
61. Preuschhof C, Heekeren HR, Taskin B, Schubert T, Villringer A. 2006. Neural correlates of vibrotactile working memory in the human brain. J Neurosci. 26:13231-13239.
62. Reales JM, Ballesteros S. 1999. Implicit and explicit memory for visual and haptic objects: cross-modal priming depends on structural descriptions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 25:644-663.
63. Ricciardi E, Bonino D, Gentili C, Sani L, Pietrini P, Vecchi T. 2006. Neural correlates of spatial working memory in humans: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study comparing visual and tactile processes. Neuroscience. 139:339-349.
64. Rice NJ, Tunik E, Grafton ST. 2006. The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution independent of requirement to update: new insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 26:8176-8182.
65. Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M. 1998. The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 106:283-296.
66. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M. 2003. Two different streams from the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res. 153:146-157.
67. Ruben J, Krause T, Taskin B, Blankenburg F, Moosmann M, Villringer A. 2006. Subarea-specific suppressive interaction in the BOLD responses to simultaneous finger stimulation in human primary somatosensory cortex: evidence for increasing rostral-to-caudal convergence. Cereb Cortex. 16:819-826.
68. Rushworth MF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H. 2006. Connection patterns distinguish 3 regions of human parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 16:1418-1430.
69. Sakata H, Taira M, Murata A, Mine S. 1995. Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 5:429-438.
70. Sakata H, Takaoka Y, Kawarasaki A, Shibutani H. 1973. Somatosensory properties of neurons in the superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 64:85-102.
71. Scheperjans F, Palomero-Gallagher N, Grefkes C, Schleicher A, Zilles K. 2005. Transmitter receptors reveal segregation of cortical areas in the human superior parietal cortex: relations to visual and somatosensory regions. Neuroimage. 28:362-379.
72. Schneider GE. 1969. Two visual systems. Science. 163:895-902.
73. Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY. 2002. A blueprint for target motion: fMRI reveals perceived sequential complexity to modulate premotor cortex. Neuroimage. 16:920-935.
74. Seitz RJ, Roland PE, Bohm C, Greitz T, Stone-Elander S. 1991. Somatosensory discrimination of shape: tactile exploration and cerebral activation. Eur J Neurosci. 3:481-492.
75. Shima K, Mushiake H, Saito N, Tanji J. 1996. Role of cells in the presupplementary motor area in updating motor plans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:8694-8598.
76. Stock O, Röder B, Burke M, Bien S, Rösler F, under review. Cortical activation patterns during long-term memory retrieval of visually or haptically encoded objects and positions.
77. Stoeckel MC, Weder B, Binkofski F, Buccino G, Shah NJ, Seitz RJ. 2003. A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an eventrelated fMRI study. Neuroimage. 19:1103-1114.
78. Stoeckel MC, Weder B, Binkofski F, Choi HJ, Amunts K, Pieperhoff P, Shah NJ, Seitz RJ. 2004. Left and right superior parietal lobule in tactile object discrimination. Eur J Neurosci. 19:1067-1072.
79. Talairach P, Tournoux J. 1988. A stereotactic coplanar atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme.
80. Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton ST. 2005. Virtual lesion of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci. 8:505-511.
81. Ungerleider L, Mishkin M. 1982. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW, editors. Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
82. Van Essen DC, Drury HA, Dickson J, Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson CH. 2001. An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 8:443-459.
83. Wagner AD, Shannon BJ, Kahn I, Buckner RL. 2005. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn Sci. 9: 445-453.
84. Worsley KJ, Friston KJ. 1995. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited-again. Neuroimage. 2:173-181.
85. Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M. 1997. Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under nullhypothesis conditions. Neuroimage. 5:179-197.