Triangulating communication design: Emerging models for theory and practice

SIGDOC'07: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 87-94

  Mehlenbacher, Brad ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Design; Practice; Theory

Indexed keywords

CONTEXTUALIZING COMMUNICATION DESIGN;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 42149116372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1297144.1297164     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512-529.
2. Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11-13.
3. Avital, M. (2000). Dealing with time in social inquiry: A tension between method and lived experience. Organization Science, 11 (6), 665-673.
4. Barab, S. A., & Roth, W-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35 (5), 3-13.
5. Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
6. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: U of Wisconsin P.
7. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3-12.
8. Bedker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141-178.
10. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8 (2), 5-21.
11. Buchanan, R. (1995). Rhetoric, humanism, and design. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 23-66). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.
12. Buchanan, R. (2001). Design and the new rhetoric: Productive arts in the philosophy of culture. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34 (3), 183-206.
13. Buchanan, R., & Margolin, V. (Eds.). (1995). Discovering design: Explorations in design studies. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.
14. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
16. Collins, A. (1996). Design issues for learning environments. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 347-361). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczye, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 15-42.
18. Cooper, G., & Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In P. J. Thomas (Ed.), The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces (pp. 48-66). Cambridge, England. Cambridge UP.
19. Cross, N. (1995). Discovering design ability. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 105-120). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.
20. Czubaroff, J. (1997). The public dimension of scientific controversies. Argumentation, 11, 51-74.
21. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 (1), 105-121.
22. Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
24. Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
25. Fahnestock, J. (2005). Rhetoric in the age of cognitive science. In R. Graff, A. E. Walzer, & J. M. Atwill (Eds.), The viability of the rhetorical tradition (pp. 159-179). Albany, NY: State U of NY.
26. Fleming, D. (2003). Becoming rhetorical: An education in the topics. In J. Petraglia & D. Bahri (Eds.), The realms of rhetoric: The prospects for rhetoric education (pp. 93-116). NY, NY: SUNYP.
27. Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.
28. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781-795.
29. Grabinger, S. (2004). Design lessons for social education. In T. M. Duffy & J. R. Kirkley (Eds.), Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education (pp. 49-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Harpine, W. D. (2004). Is Modernism really modern? Uncovering a fallacy in Postmodernism. Argumentation, 18 (3), 349-358.
31. Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challenges and opportunities. SIGDOC'06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication. NY, NY: ACM, 70-77.
32. Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? J. G. Gray (Trans.). NY, NY: Harper and Row.
33. st century. Technology in Society, 27(4), 531-549.
34. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
35. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Macaulay, C. (1999). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, 5(4), 27-39.
36. King, J. L., & Frost, R. L. (2002). Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 3-26). Cambridge, MA: MITP.
37. Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38. Koumi, J. (2005). Pedagogic design guidelines for multimedia materials: A mismatch between intuitive practitioners and experimental researchers. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, II. Available online: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2005/Jack_Koumi.htm
39. Latour, B. (1988). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
40. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London, England: Sage.
41. Levy, P. (2003). A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning. Instructional Science, 31, 87-109.
42. Manzini, E. (1995). Prometheus of the everyday: The ecology of the artificial and the designer's responsibility. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 219-243). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.
43. th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4 - Theories, Models, and Processes in HCL Las Vegas: NV: Mira Digital P, 1-10.
44. Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610-617.
45. Moran, T. P., Cozzi, A., & Farrell, S. P. (2005). Unified activity management: Supporting people in e-business. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), 67-70.
46. Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technologies with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.
47. Norman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered education. Communication of the ACM, 39 (4), 24-27.
48. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
49. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88-110). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.
50. Petroski, H. (1982). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. NY, NY: St. Martin's P.
51. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
52. Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2002). The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 107-130). Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
53. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20 (5), 347-356.
54. Quinn, C. N., & Wild, M. (1998). Supporting cognitive design: Lessons form human-computer interaction and computer-mediated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 3, 175-185.
55. Rowland, G. (2004). Shall we dance? A design epistemology for organizational learning and performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (1), 33-48.
56. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY, NY: Basic.
57. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
58. Simon, H. A. (1969, 1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.
59. Solomon, M. (2001). Is isn't the thought that counts. Argumentation, 15 (1), 67-75.
60. Soloway, E., Jackson, S. L., Klein, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S. J., Studer, S., Jul, S., Eng, J., & Scala, N. (1996). Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learnercentered design. CHI'96 Electronic Proceedings, April 17. Available online: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Soloway/es_txt.htm
61. Spinuzzi, C. (2002). Modeling genre ecologies. SIGDOC'02: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication. NY, NY: ACM, 200-207.
62. Spinuzzi, C. (2006). What do we need to teach about knowledge work? Computer Writing and Research Lab White Paper Series: #60925-1. Austin, TX: U of Texas at Austin. Available online: http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/node/962
63. Suchman, L. A. (1983). Office procedures as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1 (4), 320-328.
64. Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10(1), 131-156.
65. Turner, J. W., & Reinsch, Jr., N. L. (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44 (1), 36-58.
66. van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Harinck, F. J. H. (2000). Studying social interaction in instruction and learning: Methodological approaches and problems. In H. Cowie & G. M. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 5-20). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science.
67. Vera, A. H., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17(1), 7-48.
68. Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide. First Monday, 7(7). Available online: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_7/ warschauer/index.html
69. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.