Design lessons for social education

Learner-Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education: Cases From Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 49-69

  Grabinger, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917144331     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609489     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and memory: An integrated approach. New York: Wiley.
2. Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link?. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 88-101). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Bonk, C. J., & Reynolds, T. H. (1997). Learner-centered web instruction for higher-order thinking, teamwork, and apprenticeship. In B. H. Kahn (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 167-175). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
4. Bull, K. S., Kimball, S. L., & Stansberry, S. (1998). Instructional design in computer mediated learning. In Coming together: Preparing for rural special education in the 21st century (pp. 34-41). Charleston, SC: Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education.
5. Butterfield, E., & Nelson, G. (1989). Theory and practice of teaching for transfer. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 5-38.
6. Chi, M. T. H., & Cesi, S. J. (1987). Content knowledge: Its role, representation, and restructuring in memory development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 20, 90-91.
7. Clark, R. E., & Voogel, A. (1985). Transfer of training principles for instructional design. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 33(2), 113-125.
8. Cunningham, D., & Duffy, T. M. (1993). In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 665-692). New York: Macmillan.
9. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
10. Dijkstra, S. (1997). The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivistic design principles. Instructional Science, 25, 1-13.
11. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of Instructional Design (2nd ed.). New York: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.
13. Glazer, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research. American Psychologist, 45, 29-39.
14. Grabinger, R. S. (1993). Rich environments for active learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 665-692). New York: Macmillan.
15. Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 3(2), 5-34.
16. Graziadei, W. D., & McCombs, G. M. (1995). The 21st century classroom-scholarship environment: What will it be like?. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(2), 97-112.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Perfetto, B. A., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1983). Constraints on access in a problem solving context. Memory and Cognition, 11, 24-31.
20. Staupe, A., & Hernes, M. S. (2000). How to create a learning environment on the Internet, based on constructivism and sociocultural approaches? [sic] In G. H. Marks (Ed.), Society for information technology & teacher education international conference: Proceedings of SITE 2000 (pp. 819-825).
21. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.
23. Willis, J. (2000). The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice. Educational Technology, 40(1), 5-16.
24. Willis, J., & Wright, K. E. (2000). A general set of procedures for constructivist instructional design: The new R2D2 model. Educational Technology, 40(2), 5-16.
25. Winn, W. (1993). A constructivist critique of the assumptions of instructional design. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 189-21). New York:Springer-Verlag.