Talker's voice and gender stereotype in human auditory sentence processing - Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 339, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 191-194

  Lattner, Sonja ^a   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related brain potentials; Late positivity; Speaker gender; Speaker information; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH; STEREOTYPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOICE;

EID: 0037468579     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00027-2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Conolly J., Phillips N. Event-related potential components reflect phonological, semantic processing of the terminal words of spoken sentences. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6:1994;256-266.
2. Danemann M., Carpenter P. Individual differences in working memory and reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19:1980;450-466.
3. Fischler I., Childers D., Achariyapaopan T., Perry N.J. Brain potentials during sentence verification - automatic aspects of comprehension. Biol. Psychol. 21:1985;83-105.
4. Friederici A. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain Lang. 50:1995;259-281.
5. Friederici A. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002;78-84.
6. Friederici A., Pfeifer E., Hahne A. Event-related potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic morphological and syntactic violations. Cogn. Brain Res. 1993;183-192.
7. Gunter T., Stowe L., Mulder G. When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;660-676.
8. Hagoort P., Brown C., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Lang. Cogn. Proc. 8:1993;337-364.
9. Holcomb P., Neville H. Natural speech processing: an analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology. 19:1991;286-300.
10. Kutas M., Federmeier K. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4:2000;463-470.
11. Kutas M., Hillyard S. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biol. Psychol. 11:1980;99-116.
12. Osterhout L., Bersick M., McLaughlin J. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Mem. Cogn. 25:1997;273-285.
13. Osterhout L., Holcomb P., Swinney D. Brain potentials elicited by gardenpath sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cog. 20:1994;786-803.
14. Van Berkum J., Haagoort P., Brown C. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11:1999;657-671.
15. Van Petten C., Coulson S., Rubin S., Plante E., Parks M. Time course of word identification and semantic integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25:1999;394-417.