Recent speciation between the Baltimore Oriole and the Black-backed Oriole

Condor

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 674-680

  Kondo, Beatrice ^a   Baker, Jason M ^a   Omland, Kevin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Closely related species; Icterus abeillei; Icterus galbula; Paraphyletic species; Phylogeography; Plumage evolution; Speciation

Indexed keywords

AVES; GALBULA; ICTERUS; ICTERUS ABEILLEI; ICTERUS GALBULA;

EID: 4043113344     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/7496     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. ABLE, K. P., AND J. R. BELTHOFF. 1998. Rapid 'evolution' of migratory behavior in the introduced House Finch of eastern North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 265:2063-2071.
2. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1957. Check-list of North American birds. 5th ed. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.
3. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1973. Thirty-second supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union (AOU) check-list of North American birds. Auk 90:411-419.
4. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1983. Check-list of North American birds. 6th ed. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC.
5. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1995. Fortieth supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 112:819-830.
6. AVISE, J. C., C. D. ANKNEY, AND W. S. NELSON. 1990. Mitochondrial gene trees and the evolutionary relationship between Mallard and Black Ducks. Evolution 44:1109-1119.
7. AVISE, J. C., AND D. WALKER. 1998. Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 265:457-463.
8. BAKER, J. M., E. LÓPEZ-MEDRANO, A. G. NAVARRO-SIGÜENZA, O. R. ROJAS-SOTO, AND K. E. OMLAND. 2003. Recent speciation in the Orchard Oriole group: divergence of Icterus spurius spurius and Icterus spurius fuertesi. Auk 120:848-859.
9. DESJARDINS, P., AND R. MORAIS. 1990. Sequence and gene organization of chicken mitochondrial genome. A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. Journal of Molecular Biology 212:599-634.
10. FLEISCHER, R. C., C. E. MCINTOSH, AND C. L. TARR. 1998. Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar-based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates. Molecular Ecology 7:533-545.
11. FUNK, D. J., AND K. E. OMLAND. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochodrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:397-423.
12. GENE CODES. 2000. Sequencher. Version 4.1. Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI.
13. HACKETT, S. J. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the genus Ramphocelus (Aves). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 5:368-382.
14. HOWELL, S. N. G., AND S. WEBB. 1995. The birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. JARAMILLO, A., AND P. BURKE. 1999. New World blackbirds: the icterids. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. KAUFMANN, K. 2000. Focus guide to the birds of North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
17. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120.
18. KLICKA, J., AND R. M. ZINK. 1997. The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 227:1666-1669.
19. KOCHER, T. D., W. K. THOMAS, A. MEYER, S. V. EDWARDS, S. PAABO, F. X. VILLABLANCA, AND A. C. WILSON. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in mammals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 86:6196-6200.
20. LAMBERT, D. M., P. A. RITCHIE, C. D. MILLAR, B. HOLLAND, A. J. DRUMMOND, AND C. BARONI. 2002. Rates of evolution in ancient DNA from Adélie Penguins. Science 295:2270-2273.
21. LANYON, S. M. 1994. Polyphyly of the blackbird genus Agelaius and the importance of assumptions of monophyly in comparative studies. Evolution 48:679-693.
22. LOVETTE, I. J., AND E. BERMINGHAM. 2001. Mitochondrial perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the Parula wood warblers. Auk 118:211-215.
23. MADDISON, D. R., AND W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
24. MILLER, W. D. 1906. List of birds collected in northwestern Durango, Mexico, by J. H. Batty, during 1903. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 22:161-183.
25. MOORE, W. S. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
26. OMLAND, K. E., AND S. M. LANYON. 2000. Reconstructing plumage evolution in orioles (Icterus): repeated convergence and reversal in patterns. Evolution 54:2119-2133.
27. OMLAND, K. E., S. M. LANYON, AND S. J. FRITZ. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the New World Orioles (Icterus): the importance of dense taxon sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:224-239.
28. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. ModelTest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
29. QUINN, T. W. 1992. The genetic legacy of Mother Goose - phylogeographic patterns of Lesser Snow Goose Chen caerulescens caerulescens maternal lineages. Molecular Ecology 1:105-117.
30. SATO, A., C. O'HUIGIN, F. FIGUEROA, P. R. GRANT, B. R. GRANT, AND H. TICHY. 1999. Phylogeny of Darwin's finches as revealed by mtDNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:5101-5106.
31. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:1114-1116.
32. SIBLEY, C. C., AND L. L. J. SHORT. 1964. Hybridization in the orioles of the Great Plains. Condor 66:130-151.
33. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
34. TARR, C. L. 1995. Primers for amplification and determination of mitochondrial control-region sequences in oscine passerines. Molecular Ecology 4:527-529.
35. WILGENBUSCH, J., AND K. DE QUEIROZ. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among the phrynosomatid sand lizards inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences generated by heterogeneous evolutionary processes. Systematic Biology 49:592-612.
36. ZINK, R. M. 2004. The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 271:561-564.