Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes

Cornea

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 305-310

  Meyenberg, Alexander ^a   Iliev, Milko E ^a   Eschmann, Raphael ^b   Frueh, Beatrice E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Dynamic contour tonometry; Intraocular pressure; Keratoconus; Keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; FEMALE; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; KERATOMETRY; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 41149112006     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815dcf97     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Goldmann H, Schmidt T. [Applanation tonometry]. Ophthalmologica. 1957;134:221-242.
2. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1-30.
3. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:34-43.
4. Shimmyo M, Ross AJ, Moy A, et al. Intraocular pressure, Goldmann applanation tension, corneal thickness, and corneal curvature in Caucasians, Asians, Hispanics, and African Americans. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:603-613.
5. Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;76:223-224.
6. Madjlessi F, Marx W, Reinhard T, et al. [Impression and applanation tonometry in irregular corneas. Comparison with intraocular needle tonometry]. Ophthalmologe. 2000;97:478-481.
7. Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:344-350.
8. Kanngiesser H, Kniestedt C. [Tonometry in change. From indentation and applanation to contour adaptation]. Ophthalmologe. 2005;102:849-855.
9. Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:359-366.
10. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA. Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea. 1992;11:427-432.
11. Redbrake C, Arend O. [Corneal transplantation and glaucoma]. Ophthalmologe. 2000;97:552-556.
12. Aldave AJ, Rudd JC, Cohen EJ, et al. The role of glaucoma therapy in the need for repeat penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2000;19:772-776.
13. Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, et al. [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in penetrating keratoplasties]. Ophthalmologe. 2006;103:773-776.
14. Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea. 2006;25:890-894.
15. Ismail AR, Lamont M, Perera S, et al. Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:980-981.
16. Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Vessani RM, et al. Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics. 2006; 61:511-514.
17. Bland M, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing the difference between two methods of measurement. Lancet. 1986;i:307-310.
18. Edmund C. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1989;193:1-36.
19. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28:293-322.
20. Newsome DA, Foidart JM, Hassell JR, et al. Detection of specific collagen types in normal and keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:738-750.
21. Wollensak J, Buddecke E. Biochemical studies on human corneal proteoglycans - a comparison of normal and keratoconic eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228:517-523.
22. Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, et al. Accuracy and precision of the Tono-Pen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1697-1700.
23. Geyer O, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, et al. Tono-Pen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:538-540.
24. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:20-26.
25. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3118-3121.
26. Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement - comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:2-6.
27. Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:318-320.
28. Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, et al. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1572-1575.
29. Kniestedt C, Lin S, Choe J, et al. Correlation between intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, stage of glaucoma, and demographic patient data: prospective analysis of biophysical parameters in tertiary glaucoma practice populations. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:91-97.
30. Bron AJ. Keratoconus. Cornea. 1988;7:163-169.
31. Patel S, McLaughlin JM. Effects of central corneal thickness on measurement of intra-ocular pressure in keratoconus and post-keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:236-241.
32. Rao VJ, Gnanaraj L, Mitchell KW, et al. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea. 2001;20:834-838.
33. Browning AC, Bhan A, Rotchford AP, et al. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:1395-1399.
34. Kaufman HE. Pressure measurement: which tonometer? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1972;11:80-85.
35. Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP reading. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:85-87.
36. Heras-Mulero H, Moreno-Montanes J, Sadaba Echarri LM, et al. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry (Pascal(R)) with pneumotonometry and Goldmann tonometry]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82:337-342.
37. Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3790-3794.
38. Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:746-751.