Assessing phylogenetic dependence of morphological traits using co-inertia prior to investigate character evolution in Loricariinae catfishes

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 986-1002

  Covain, Raphaël ^a,b   Dray, Stéphane ^c   Fisch Muller, Sonia ^a   Montoya Burgos, Juan I ^b  

^a MUSÉUM D HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Character mapping; Co inertia analysis; Loricariidae; Molecular phylogeny; Morphology; Orthogram; Ribosomal genes; Siluriformes

Indexed keywords

LORICARIA; LORICARIICHTHYS; LORICARIIDAE; PSEUDOHEMIODON; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 40849139430     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abouheif E. A method to test the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1 (1999) 895-909
2. Blomberg S.P., Garland Jr. T., and Ives A.R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 (2003) 717-745
3. Chessel D., Dufour A.B., and Thioulouse J. The ade4 package-I-one-table methods. R News 4 (2004) 5-10
4. Cheverud J.M., Dow M.M., and Leutenegger W. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39 (1985) 1335-1351
5. Covain R., and Fisch-Muller S. The genera of the Neotropical armored catfish subfamily Loricariinae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae): a practical key and synopsis. Zootaxa 1462 (2007) 1-40
6. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., de Sant'Ana C.E.R., and Bini L.M. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52 (1998) 1247-1262
7. Dolédec S., and Chessel D. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biol. 31 (1994) 277-294
8. Dray S., Chessel D., and Thioulouse J. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology 84 (2003) 3078-3089
9. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7 (1979) 1-26
10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA-sequences-a maximum-likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17 (1981) 368-376
11. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 (1985) 1-15
12. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
13. Felsenstein, J., 2004. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
14. Fitch W.M., and Margoliash E. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155 (1967) 279-284
15. Gittleman J.L., and Kot M. Adaptation: statistics and null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39 (1990) 227-241
16. Goldman N., Anderson J.P., and Rodrigo A.G. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 652-670
17. Gower J.C. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53 (1966) 325-338
18. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41 (1999) 95-98
19. Harvey P.H., and Pagel M.D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (1991), Oxford University Press, Oxford 248 pp.
20. Hill M.O., and Smith A.J.E. Principal component analysis of taxonomic data with multi-state discrete characters. Taxon 25 (1976) 249-255
21. Huelsenbeck J.P., Nielsen R., and Bollback J. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 131-158
22. Ihaka R., and Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5 (1996) 299-314
23. Isbrücker I.J.H. Description préliminaire de nouveaux taxa de la famille des Loricariidae, poissons-chats cuirassés néotropicaux, avec un catalogue critique de la sous-famille nominale (Pisces, Siluriformes). Rev. Fr. Aquariol. 5 (1979) 86-116
24. Leviton A.E., Gibbs Jr. R.H., Heal E., and Dawson C.E. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985 (1985) 802-832
25. Lewis P.O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 913-925
26. Lingoes J.C. Some boundary conditions for a monotone analysis of symmetric matrices. Psychometrika 36 (1971) 195-203
27. Lynch M. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45 (1991) 1065-1080
28. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2006a. StochChar: a package of mesquite modules for stochastic models of character evolution. Version 1.1 .
29. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2006b. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.12 .
30. Montoya-Burgos J.I., Muller S., Weber C., and Pawlowski J. Phylogenetic relationships of the Loricariidae (Siluriformes) based on mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences. In: Malabarba L.R., Reis R.E., Vari R.P., Lucena Z.M.S., and Lucena C.A.S. (Eds). Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes (1998), Edipucrs Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil 363-374
31. Ollier S., Couteron P., and Chessel D. Orthonormal transform to decompose the variance of a life-history trait across a phylogenetic tree. Biometrics 62 (2006) 471-477
32. Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401 (1999) 877-884
33. Pagel M. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 612-622
34. Pagel M., Meade A., and Barker D. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 673-684
35. Posada D., and Crandall K.A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818
36. Rapp Py-Daniel, L.H., 1997. Phylogeny of the Neotropical armored catfishes of the subfamily Loricariinae (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, 280 pp.
37. Reeve, J., Abouheif, E., 2003. Phylogenetic Independence Version 2.0. Distributed freely by the authors on request. Department of Biology, McGill University.
38. Robert P., and Escoufier Y. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: the RV coefficient. Appl. Stat.-J. Roy. St. C 25 (1976) 257-265
39. Rholf F.J. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55 (2001) 2143-2160
40. Saitou N., and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425
41. Schaefer S.A. Osteology of Hypostomus plecostomus (Linnaeus) with a phylogenetic analysis of the loricariid subfamilies (Pisces: Siluroidei). Contrib. Sci., Los Angeles Co. Mus. Nat. Hist. 394 (1987) 1-31
42. Schaefer S.A. Phylogenetic analysis of the loricariid subfamily Hypoptopomatinae (Pisces: Siluroidei: Loricariidae), with comments on generic diagnoses and geographic distribution. Zool. J. Linn. Soc.-Lond. 102 (1991) 1-41
43. Schaefer S.A., and Stewart D.J. Systematics of the Panaque dentex species group (Siluriformes: Loricariidae), wood-eating armored catfishes from tropical South America. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwater 4 (1993) 309-342
44. Schluter D., Price T., Mooers A.O., and Ludwig D. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51 (1997) 1699-1711
45. Shimodaira H., and Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1114-1116
46. Sokal R.R., and Rohlf F.J. Biometry. third ed. (1995), W.H. Freeman & Co., New York 887 pp.
47. Swofford, D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
48. Tavaré S. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. In: Miura R.M. (Ed). Some Mathematical Questions in Biology-DNA Sequence Analysis (1986), American Mathematics Society, Providence, RI 57-86
49. Thioulouse J., Chessel D., Dolédec S., and Olivier J.M. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat. Comput. 7 (1997) 75-83
50. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., and Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994) 4673-4680
51. von Neumann J., Kent R.H., Bellinson H.R., and Hart B.I. The mean square successive difference. Ann. Math. Stat. 12 (1941) 153-162