Interdependence and integration learning in student project teams: Do team project assignments achieve what we want them to?

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-65

  Skilton, Paul F ^a   Forsyth, David ^a   White, Otis J ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Integration learning; Interdependence; Project teams; Student teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749098088     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475307312198     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Ailes, C.B., & Bosworth, C.C. (2004). The perception and reality of student and workplace teams. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 59, 42-59.
3. Bacon, D.R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248-267.
4. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173-1182.
5. Barr, T.F., Dixon, A.L., & Gassenheimer, J.B. (2005). Exploring the "lone wolf" phenomenon in student project teams. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 81-90.
6. Black, K.M. (1994). Industry view of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 26-28.
7. Bolton, M.K. (1999). The role of coaching in student teams, A "just in time" learning approach. Journal of Management Education, 23, 233-250.
8. Brown, A., & Neilson, A. (1993). The pros and cons of experientially based projects. Journal of Management Education, 17, 499-504.
9. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40, 90-111.
10. Deeter-Schmelz, D.R., Kennedy, K.N., & Ramsey, R.P. (2002). Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 114-124.
11. DeFillippi, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film making. California Management Review, 40, 125-139.
12. Gerwin, D., & Barrowman, N.G. (2002). An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Science, 48, 938-953.
13. Grant, R.M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
14. Hewitt, C. (1986). Offices are open systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4, 271-287.
15. Holtham, C.W., Melville, R.R., & Sodhi, M.S. (2006). Designing student groupwork in management education: Widening the palette of options. Journal of Management Education, 30, 809-817.
16. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
17. Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Klein, J.A., & Maurer, P.M. (1995). Integrators not generalists needed: A case study of integrated product development teams. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 2, 93-116.
19. Kloppenburg, T.J., & Baucus, M.S. (2004). Project management in local non-profit organizations: Engaging students in problem based learning. Journal of Management Education, 28, 610-629.
20. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Lopez, T.B., & Lee, R.G. (2005). Five principles for workable client based projects: Lessons from the trenches. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 172-188.
22. MacKay, B., Wurst, K., & Barker, K. (1997, October). Teaching IPPD and teamwork in an engineering design course. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh.
23. McCloskey, D. (2004). Adding realism to the formation, management and evaluation of project teams. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 9-11.
24. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14-37.
25. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Pearce, J.L., & Gregerson, H.B. (1991). Task interdependence and extra-role behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838-844.
27. Purser, R.E., Pasmore, W.A., & Tenkasi, R.V. (1992). The influence of deliberations on learning in new product development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 9, 1-28.
28. Seat, J.E., & Lord, S.M. (1998, October). Enabling effective engineering teams: A program for teaching interaction skills. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ.
29. Siciliano, J.I. (2001). How to incorporate cooperative learning principles in the classroom: It's more than just putting students in teams. Journal of Management Education, 25, 8-20.
30. Simon, H.A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 145-180.
31. Skilton, P.F. (2000). Participant learning in product and process development teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
32. Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (Vol. II, pp. 37-54). London: Pitman.
33. Tabachnik, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
34. Tan, J., Yang, Y., & Ketema, S. (2003, November). Experiencing real world projects through team based courses. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.
35. Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Tichon, M., & Seat, E.J. (2004, October). Team toolbox, Activities and suggestions for facilitating project teams. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
37. Tyre, M., & Von Hippel, E. (1997). The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organization Science, 8, 71-88.
38. Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., & Koenig, R., Jr. (1976). Determinants of coordination mode within an organization. American Sociological Review, 41, 323-338.
39. Von Hippel, E., & Tyre, M. (1995). How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Research Policy, 24, 1-12.
40. Young, C.B., & Henquinet, J.A. (2000). A conceptual framework for designing group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 56-60.