The brain might read that way

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 293-304

  Perfetti, Charles A ^a   Bolger, Donald J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043139478     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0803_7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Beeman, M. J., Bowman, E. M., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2000). Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language, 71, 310-336.
2. Bolger, D. J. (2003). Development of orthographic knowledge in the brain: A cognitive neuroscience investigation of the self-organizing principles of the ventral visual cortex for reading. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
3. Brady, S. A., & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.). (1991). Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Breznitz, Z., & Misra, M. (2003). Speed of processing of the visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological systems in adult dyslexies: The contribution of "asynchrony" to word recognition deficits. Brain & Language, 85, 486-502.
5. Caplan, D. (2004). Functional neuroimaging studies of written sentence comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 225-240.
6. Chee, M. W. L., Tan, E. W. L., & Thiel, T. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with fMRI. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3050-3056.
7. Eden, G. F., & Zeffiro, T. A. (1996). The visual deficit theory of developmental dyslexia. NeuroImage, 4(3), S108-S117.
8. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Learning to read and spell words. In L. Rieben & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 57-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Fiez, J. A., & Petersen, S. E. (1998). Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 914-921.
10. Fodor, J. (2000) The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Friederici, A., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
12. Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: A meta-analysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage, 20, 693-712.
13. Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The time course of brain activity in reading English and Chinese: An ERP study of Chinese bilinguals. Journal of Human Brain Mapping, 18(3), 167-175.
14. Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Wang, M. (2003April). Learning to read in a new writing system: Event-related potential evidence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York.
15. Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text: A theoretical account of generation and integration component processes utilizing both cerebral hemispheres. Psychological Science, 15, 1-7.
16. McCandliss, B., Sandak, R., Martinez, A., Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2001, March). Imaging the impact of reading intervention in children. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society meeting, New York.
17. Mechelli, A., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Price, C. J. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of word and pseudoword reading: Consistencies, inconsistencies, and limitations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 260-271.
18. Misra, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Neural systems for rapid automatized naming in skilled readers: Unraveling the RAN-reading relationship. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 241-256.
19. Orton, S.T. (1925). Word-blindness in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14, 581-615.
20. Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
21. Paulesu, E., Demonet, J. F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N. et al. (2001, March 16). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165-2167.
22. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 3-24.
25. Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7, 273-282.
26. Perfetti, C. A., Schmalhoffer, F., Balass, M., Nelson, J., Yang, C.-Y., & Wlotko. E. (2003, July). ERPs expose integrative processes in text comprehension. Paper presented at the Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: Inference and Comprehension Processes Conference, Hanse Advanced Study Institute, Delmenhorst, Germany.
27. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
28. Poldrack, R. A., Wagner, A. D., Prull, M. W., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. (1999). Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 10, 15-35.
29. Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: Contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 335-359.
30. Price, C. J. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19, 473-481.
31. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19,473-481.
32. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 419-492.
33. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001, November). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31-74.
34. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (in press). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
35. Salmelin, R., & Helenius, P. (2004). Functional neuroanatomy of impaired reading in dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 257-272.
36. Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., & Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiological basis of skilled and impaired reading: Recent findings and new directions. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 273-292.
37. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
38. Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., & Skudlarski, P. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 101-110.
39. Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencel, W. E., et al. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 2636-2641.
40. Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Bergman, E., Breier, J. I., Foorman, B. R., Castillo, E. M., et al. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203-1213.
41. Snowling, M., Hulme, C., & Goulandris, N. (1994). Word recognition and development: A connectionist interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 895-916.
42. Stanovich, K. E., & Siegel, L. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
43. St. George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, ??., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 22, 1317-1325.
44. Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. NeuroImage, 13, 836-846.
45. Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Feng, C. M., Siok, W. T., Perfetti, C. A., Xiong, J., et al. (2003). Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 158-166.
46. Tan L. H., Spinks J. A., Gao, J. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., & Fox, P. T. (2000). Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: A functional MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 16-27.
47. Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 2860-2865.
48. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from brain related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
49. Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Wolf, M., Bowers, P., & Greig, P. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.