Constructivist remediation: Correction in context

International Journal of Special Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 72-88

  Johnson, Genevieve Marie ^a  

^a MACEWAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043096135     PISSN: 08273383     EISSN: 19177844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
2. Allor, J. H. (2002). The relationship of phonemic awareness and rapid naming to reading development. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 41-51.
3. Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
4. Asselin, M. (2001). Word recognition. Teacher Librarian, 29(1), 57-59.
5. Baines, L. A., & Stanley, G. (2000). We want to see the teacher: Constructivism and the rage against expertise. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 327-330.
6. Bloome, D., & Dail, A. R. K. (1997). Toward (re)defining miscue analysis: Reading as a social and cultural process. Language Arts, 74(8), 610-618.
7. Boran, S., & Comber, B. (2001). Critiquing whole language and classroom inquiry. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8. Byrne, B. (1996). The learnability of the alphabetic principle: Children's initial hypotheses about how print represents spoken speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 401-426.
9. Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2002). Increasing the reading achievement of at-risk children through direct instruction: Evaluating the Rodeo Institute for Teacher Excellence (RITE). Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 7(2), 141-166.
10. Choate, S. (Ed.). (1993). Successful mainstreaming: Proven ways to detect and correct special needs. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11. DynaGloss. (1998, February 23). Instructionism. Retrieved July 12, 2002, from http://Seed.cs.colorado.edu/dynagloss.makeGlossPage.fcgi$URLinc= 1&Term=In structionism.
12. Ediger, M. (2001). Issues in reading instruction. Reading Improvement, 38(1), 22-26.
13. Ehri, L. (1998). Presidential address. In Joanna P. Williams (Ed.), Scientific studies of reading, 2(2), (pp. 97-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Engelmann, S., Hanner, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Corrective reading. Eugene, OR: Science Research Associates.
15. Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp.459-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Fink, R. (1996). Successful dyslexics: A constructionist study of passionate interest reading. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 39(4), 268-280.
17. Fisher, B. (1991). Joyful learning: A whole language kindergarten. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18. Fosnot, C. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, (pp.8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999). Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm. Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Gaskins, R. W., Gaskins, J. C., & Gaskins, I. W. (1992). Using what you know to figure out what you don't know: An analogy approach to decoding. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 8, 197-221.
21. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 279-321.
22. Goldberg, C. (1992). Instructional conversation: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading Teacher, 46, 316-326.
23. Goodman, K. S. (1986). What's whole about whole language? A parent/teacher guide to children's learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
24. Goodman, K. S. (1998). In defense of good teaching: What teachers need to know about the reading wars. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. W. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145-162.
26. Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1999). Introduction to learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Hay, K. E. (1993). Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism, constructivism: Whose situation is it anyway? Educational Technology, 33(3), 33-38.
28. Hecht, S. A., & Greenfield, D. B. (2001). Comparing the predictive validity of first grade teacher ratings and reading-related tests on third grade levels of reading skills in young children exposed to poverty. School Psychology Review 30(1), 50-69.
29. Herman, R., Aladjem, D., McMahon, P., Masem, E., Mulligan, I., O'Malley, A., et al. (1999). An educators' guide to schoolwide reform. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
30. Hogan, L., & Peterson, T. (2001). Camelot: Our search for "good teaching." Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(1), 6-8.
31. Honebein, P. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 17-24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
32. Hoover, M. R., & Fabian, E. M. (2000). A successful program for struggling readers. Reading Teacher, 53(6), 474-476.
33. Jeynes, W., & Littell, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies examining the effect of whole language instruction on the literacy of low-SES students. Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 21-33.
34. Johnson, G. M. (1998). Principles of instruction for at-risk learners. Preventing School Failure, 42(4), 167-174.
35. Johnson, F. (2001). The utility of phonics generalizations: Let's take another look at Clymer's conclusions. The Reading Teacher, 55, 132-143.
36. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism vs. constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
37. Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: Simon & Schuster.
38. Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
39. Kaiser, S., Palumbo, K., Bialozor, R. C., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The effects of Direct Instruction with rural remedial students: A brief report. Reading Improvement, 26, 88-93.
40. Kameenui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
41. Krashen, S. (1999). Three arguments against whole language and why they are wrong. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
42. Krashen, S. (2002). Defending whole language: The limits of phonics instruction and the efficacy of whole language instruction. Reading Improvement, 39(1), 32-42.
43. Lefrancois, G. R. (1999). Psychology for teaching (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. L. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458-476.
45. Martinez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965-977.
46. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1999). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction. Upper Saddle river, NJ: Merrill.
47. Mayer, R. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 151-161.
48. McIntyre, E., & Pressley, M. (1996). Strategies and skills in whole language: An introduction to balanced teaching. Boston, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
49. Moses, F. (2001, July). The structural drill in remedial teaching. The Internet TESLJournal, 7(7). Retrieved July 10, 2002, from http://iteslj.org/ Techniques/Moses-Drill.html.
50. Novick, R. (2002). Many paths to literacy: Language, literature, and learning in the primary classroom. Portland, OR: Northwestern Regional Educational Laboratory.
51. O'Brien, D. M., & Ware, A. M. (2002). Implementing research-based reading programs in the Fort Worth Independent School District. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 7(2), 167-195.
52. Palmaffy, T. (1997, November - December). See Dick Flunk. Policy Review, 86, 32-40.
53. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 5-12.
54. Prawat, R. (1996). Constructivism, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychology, 31(3/4), 215-225.
55. Pressley, M., Roehrig, A., Bogner, K., Raphael, L. M., & Dolezal, S. (2002). Balanced literacy instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(5), 1-14.
56. Rabren, K., Darch, C., & Eaves, R. C. (1999). The differential effects of two systematic reading comprehension approaches with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32 (1), 36-41.
57. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A newparadigm of instructional theory (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. st century. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
60. Schug, M., Tarver, S., & Western, R. (2001). Direct Instruction and the teaching of early reading. Wisconsin Policy Research Institute Report, Vol. 14(2). Thiensville, WI: Wisconsin Policy Research Institute.
61. Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). Lasting differences: The high/scope preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, Monograph 12.
62. Shabo, A. (1997). Integrating constructionism and instructionism in educational hypermedia programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(3), 231-277.
63. Shafer, G. (2001). Religion, politics, and the fear of whole language education. The Humanist, 61(5), 5-8.
64. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
65. Smart, D., Sanson, A., & Prior, M. (1996). Connection between reading disability and behavior problems: Testing and causal hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 24(3), 363-383.
66. Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading (5th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Smith, J. W. A., & Elley, W. B. (1995). Learning to read in New Zealand. New York: Richard C. Owen.
68. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
69. Stanford, P., & Siders, J. A. (2001). Authentic assessment of intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(3), 163-167.
70. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
71. Stein, M., Carnine, D., & Dixon, R. (1998). Direct Instruction: Integrating curriculum design and effective teaching practice. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 227-335.
72. Stickland, D. S. (1998). Teaching phonics today: A primer for educators. Newark,DE: International Reading Association.
73. Swanson, L. (2001). Searching for the best model for instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(2), 1-15.
74. Taylor, D. (1998). Beginning to read and the spin doctors of science: The political campaign to change America's mind about how children learn toread. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
75. Todd, J. T., & Morris, E. K. (Eds.). (1995). Modern perspectives on B.F. Skinner and contemporary behaviorism. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
76. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severereading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33-58, 78.
77. Valencia, S. W. (1997). Authentic classroom assessment of early reading: Alternatives to standardized tests. Preventing School Failure, 41(2), 63-70.
78. Vaughn, S., Levy, S., Coleman, M., & Bos, C. S. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observational studies. The Journal of Special Education, 36(1), 2-13.
79. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
80. von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, (pp.3-7). New York:Teachers College Press.
81. Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary, elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehension, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 375-388.
82. Yates, S. L., & Nagel, S. (1997). How do we know that Johnny can read? Thrust for Educational Leadership, 26(5), 22-25.
83. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Bizar, M. (1999). Sixty years of reading research - Butwho's listening? Phi Delta Kappan, 80(7), 513-517.