Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 965-977

  Martínez, María A ^a   Sauleda, Narcís ^a   Huber, Güenter L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Conceptions of learning; Experienced teachers; Metaphors; Prospective teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035624467     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson J.R., Greeno J.G., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher. 29(4):2000;11-13.
2. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher. 25(4):1996;5-11.
3. Anderson J.R., Reder L.M., Simon H.A. Rejoinder: Situative versus cognitive perspectives. Form versus substance Educational Researcher. 26(1):1997;18-21.
4. Antil L.R., Jenkins J.R., Wayne S.K., Vadasy P. Cooperative learning. Prevalence conceptualizations and the relation between research and practice American Educational Research Journal. 35(3):1998;419-454.
5. Apple M.W. Review of "Dewey, Peirce and the learning paradox" American Educational Research Journal. 36(1):1999;77-82.
6. Bachelard G. Epistémologie (epistemology). 1974;Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
7. Brown A.L., Campione J.C. Concevoir une communauté de jeunes élèves. Leçons théoriques et practiques. Revue Française de Pédagogie. 11:1995;11-33.
8. Bruner J. The culture of education. 1996;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Cobb P., Bowers J. Cognitive and situative learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher. 28(2):1999;4-15.
10. Damasio A. Descartes' error. 1994;G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York.
11. De Jong O., Korthagen F., Wubbels T. Research on science teacher education in Europe. teacher thinking and conceptual change Fraser B.J., Tobin K.G. International handbook of science education. 1998;745-760 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
12. De Kleer J., Brown J.S. A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artifical Intelligence. 24:1984;7-84.
13. Driver R., Earsley J. Pupils and paradigms. A review of literature related to concept development in science Studies in Science Education. 5:1978;61-84.
14. Dewey, J. (1933/1998). How we think. Boston: D:C. Health.
15. Duschl R.A., Hamilton R.J. Conceptual change in science and in the learning of science. Fraser B.J., Tobin K.G. International Handbook of Science Education. 1998;1047-1065 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. Forbus K.D. Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence. 24:1984;85-186.
17. Gardner H. Frames of mind. 1983/1993;Fontana Pres, London.
18. Gardner H. Extraordinary minds. 1997;Weindefeld Nicolson, London.
19. Gardner H. The disciplined mind. 1999;Simon & Schuster, New York.
20. Gardner H. Intelligence reframed. 1999;Basic Books, New York.
21. Gee J.P. Review of the "Learning paradox" manuscript. American Educational Research Journal. 36(1):1999;87-96.
22. Generalitat Valenciana (1992). Decreto 20/1992, de 17 de febrero, del Gobierno Valenciano, por el que se establece el Currículo de Educación Primaria de la Comunidad Valenciana. DOGV (92/0773).
23. Greeno J.G. On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Researcher. 26(1):1997;5-17.
24. Greeno J.G., Collins A.M., Resnik L.B. Cognition and learning. Berliner D.C., Calfee R.C. Handbook of educational psychology. 1996;15-46 Simon & Shuster Macmillan, New York.
25. Gurney B.F. Tugboats and tennis games. Preservice conceptions of teaching and learning revealed though metaphors Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 32:1995;569-583.
26. Habermas, J. (1981a). Theorie des kommunikativen handelns. Band I. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung (Theory of communicative action. Vol. I. Rationality of action and rationalization of society). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
27. Habermas, J. (1981b). Theorie des kommunikativen handelns. Band II. Zur Kritik der funktiona listischen Vernunft (Theory of communicative action. Vol. II. About the critic of functionalistic rationality). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
28. Johnson M. The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason:1987;Chicago University Press, Chicago.
29. Johnson-Laird P.N. Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. 1983;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Lakoff, G. (1999a). Philosophy in the flesh. A talk with George Lakoff. http://www.edge.org/3rd-culture/lakoff/lakoff-p1.html.
31. Lakoff, G. (1999b). The reality club: Philosophy in the flesh. Post 6. http://www.edge.rog/discourse/lakoff.html.
32. Lakoff, G. (1999c). Philosophy in the flesh. http://www.edge.org/discourse/lakoff.html.
33. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. 1980;Chicago University Press, Chicago.
34. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh. 1999;Basic Books, New York.
35. Latour B. Pandora's hope. 1999;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Lave J. Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life:1988;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Lave J., Wenger E. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation:1991;Cambridge University Press, New York.
38. Martínez, M. A., & Sauleda, N. (1998). Teacher education research in the framework theory of the conceptual change as a social construction: A case study. Paper presented to the ECER 98, Ljubljana.
39. Narayanan, S. (1997). A computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/-snarayan/metaphor.html.
40. Noddings N. Comments on "Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox" American Educational Research Journal. 36(1):1999;83-85.
41. Phillips D.C. Philosophical perspectives. Berliner D.C., Calfee R.C. Handbook of educational psychology. 1996;1019-1105 Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York.
42. Popkewitz T.S. A social epistemology of educational research. Popkewitz T.S., Fendler L. Critical theories in education. 1999;17-44 Routledge, New York.
43. Posner G.J., Strike K., Hewson P.W., Gerzog W.A. Accommodation of a scientific conception. towards a theory of conceptual change Science education. 66:1982;211-227.
44. Pozo J.I. La crisis de la educación científica ¿volver a lo clásico o volver al constructivismo? (The crisis of scientific education: Back to the classics or back to constructivism?). Alambique. 14:1997;91-104.
45. Prawat R.S. Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradox. American Educational Research Journal. 36(1):1999;47-76.
46. Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in learning. 1990;Oxford University Press, New York.
47. Solomon G., Perkins D. Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education. 23:1998;25-72.
48. Sfard A. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher. 27(2):1998;4-13.
49. Tobin K., Tippins D. Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education. 80(6):1996;711-730.