Introduction to the systematics of species rich groups

Reconstructing the Tree of Life: Taxonomy and Systematics of Species Rich Taxa

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 3-20

  Hodkinson, T R ^a   Parnell, J A N ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749092025     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420009538     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Blackmore, S., Biodiversity update: progress in taxonomy, Science, 298, 365, 2002.
2. Pennisi, E., Modernizing the tree of life, Science, 300, 1692, 2003.
3. Wheeler, Q.D., Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 571, 2004.
4. Gaston, K.J. and May, R.M., The taxonomy of taxonomists, Nature, 356, 281, 1992.
5. Solow, A.R., Mound, L.A., and Gaston, K.J., Estimating the rate of synonymy, Syst. Biol., 44, 93, 1995.
6. May, R.M., The dimensions of life on earth, in Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington DC, 2000.
7. Hodkinson, I.D. and Casson, D., A lesser predilection for bugs -Hemiptera (Insecta) diversity in tropical rain-forests, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 43, 101, 1991.
8. Stork, N.E., Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 35, 321, 1988.
9. Ødegaard, F., Diserud, O.H., and Ostbye, K., The importance of plant relatedness for host utilization among phytophagous insects, Ecol. Lett., 8, 612, 2005.
10. Funch, P. and Kristensen, R.M., Cycliophora is a new phylum with affinities to Entoprocta and Ectoprocta, Nature, 378, 711, 1995.
11. Guillou, L. et al., Bolidomonas: a new genus with two species belonging to a new algal class, the Bolidophyceae (Heterokonta), J. Phycol., 35, 368, 1999.
12. Kühn, S., Medin, M., and Eller, G., Phylogenetic position of the parasitoid nanoflagellate Pirsonia inferred from nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal DNA and a description of Pseudopirsonia n. gen. and Pseudopirsonia mucosa (Drebes) comb. nov., Protist, 155, 143, 2004.
13. Frodin, D.G., History and concepts of big plant genera, Taxon, 53, 753, 2004.
14. Vaughan, T.A., Ryan, J.M., and Capzaplewski, N.J., Mammalogy, 4th ed., Saunders College Publishing, 2000.
15. Michaux, J., Reyes, A., and Catzeflis, F., Evolutionary history of the most speciose mammals:molecular phylogeny of muroid rodents, Molec. Biol. Evol., 17, 280, 2001.
16. O’Leary, M.A. et al., Building the mammalian sector of the tree of life: combining different data and a discussion of divergence times for placental mammals, in Assembling the Tree of Life, Cracraft, J. and Donoghue, M.J., Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, 490.
17. Wilson, D.E. and Reeder, D.M., Eds., Mammal Species of the World, 3rd ed., Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
18. Willis, J.C., Age and Area, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1922.
19. Willis, J.C., The birth and spread of plants, Boissera, 8, 1949.
20. Dial, K.P. and Marzluff, J.M., Nonrandom diversification within taxonomic assemblages, Syst. Zool., 38, 26, 1989.
21. Mabberley, D.J., The Plant Book, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
22. Cronk, Q., Measurement of biological and historical influences on plant classifications, Taxon, 38, 357, 1989.
23. Scotland, R.W. and Sanderson, M.J., The significance of few versus many in the tree of life, Science, 303, 643, 2004.
24. Jackson, D.A., Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches, Ecology, 74, 2204, 1993.
25. Darwin, C., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, John Murray, London, 1859.
26. Haeckel, E., Generale Morphologie der Organismen, Verlag von Georg Reimer, Berlin, 1866.
27. Baldauf, S.L., The deep roots of eukaryotes, Science, 300, 1703, 2003.
28. Cracraft, J. and Donoghue, M.J., Assembling the Tree of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
29. Palmer, J.D., Soltis, D.E., and Chase, M.W., The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view, Amer. J. Bot., 91, 1437, 2004.
30. Woese, C.R., Kandler, O., and Wheelis, M.C., Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria and Eucarya, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 4576, 1990.
31. Woese, C.R., The universal ancestor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 6854, 1998.
32. Doolittle, W.F., Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree, Science, 284, 2124, 1999.
33. Martin, W. and Embley, T.M., Early evolution comes full circle, Nature, 431, 134, 2004.
34. Rivera, M.C. and Lake, J.A., The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes, Nature, 431, 152, 2004.
35. Linder, C.R. and Rieseberg, L.H., Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants, Amer. J. Bot., 91, 1700, 2004.
36. Zimmer, C., Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea, William Heinemann, London, 2002, 101.
37. Savolainen, V. and Chase M.W., A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics, Trends Genet., 19, 717, 2003.
38. Sanderson, M.J. and Driskell, A.C., The challenge of constructing large phylogenetic trees, Trends Plant Sci., 8, 374, 2003.
39. Efron, B., Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann., Stat., 7, 1, 1979.
40. Felsenstein, J., Phylogenies and the comparative method, Am. Nat., 125, 1, 1985.
41. Salamin N., et al., Assessing internal support with large phylogenetic DNA matrices, Molec. Phylogenet. Evol., 27, 528, 2003.
42. Erdos, P.L. et al., A few logs suffice to build (almost) all trees: part II, Theor. Comp. Sci., 221, 77, 1999.
43. Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., et al., Scaling of accuracy in extremely large phylogenetic trees, in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 6, Altman, R.B., et al., Eds., World Scientific Publishing Company, River Edge, New Jersey, 2001, 547.
44. Salamin, N., Hodkinson T.R., and Savolainen, V., Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera, Syst. Biol., 54, 183, 2005.
45. Hillis, D.M., Inferring complex phylogenies, Nature, 383, 130, 1996.
46. Hillis, D.M., Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias, Syst. Biol., 47, 3, 1998.
47. Källersjö, M. et al., Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants, Pl. Syst. Evol., 213, 259, 1998.
48. Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., and Chase, M.W., Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology, Nature, 402, 402, 1999.
49. Savolainen, V. et al., Phylogeny reconstruction and functional constraints in organellar genomes:plastid versus animal mitochondrion, Syst., Biol., 51, 638, 2002.
50. Salamin, N., Hodkinson T.R., and Savolainen, V., Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae), Syst. Biol., 51, 136, 2002.
51. Wilkinson, M. et al., The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods, Syst. Biol., 54, 419, 2005.
52. Dobzhansky, T., Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution, Am. Biol. Teach., 35, 125, 1973.
53. Purvis, A., Using interspecies phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses, in New Uses for New Phylogenies, Harvey, P.H. et al., Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996, 153.
54. Harvey, P.H. et al., Eds., New Uses for New Phylogenies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996.
55. Rannala, B. et al., Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies, Syst. Biol., 47, 702, 1998.
56. Källersjö, M., Albert, V.A., and Farris, J.S., Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure, Cladistics, 15, 91, 1999.
57. Hillis, D.M. et al., Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol., 52, 124, 2003.
58. Clayton, W.D., Some aspects of the genus concept, Kew Bull., 27, 281, 1972.
59. Clayton, W.D., The logarithmic distribution of angiosperm families, Kew Bull., 29, 271, 1974.
60. Clayton, W.D., Chorology of the genera of Gramineae, Kew Bull., 30, 111, 1975.
61. Clayton, W.D. and Renvoize, S.A., Genera Graminum: Grass Genera of the World, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1986.
62. Barraclough, T.G. and Nee, S., Phylogenetics and speciation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 391, 2001.
63. Chan, K.M.A. and Moore B.R., Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates, Syst. Biol., 51, 855, 2002.
64. Chan, K.M.A. and Moore B.R., SYMMETREE: whole-tree analysis of differential diversification rates, Bioinformatics, 21, 1709, 2004.
65. Moore, B.R., Chan, K.M.A., and Donoghue, M.J., Detecting diversification rate variation in supertrees, in Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004, 487.
66. Parnell, J.A.N., The monetary value of herbarium collections, in Biological Collections and Biodiversity, Rushton, B.S., Hackney, P., and Tyrie, C.R., Eds., Linnean Society of London Special Publication 3, England, 2001, 271.
67. Compton, J.A., Clennett, J.C.B., and Culham, A., Nomenclature in the dock. Overclassification leads to instability: a case study in the horticulturally important genus Cyclamen, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 146, 339, 2004.
68. Bisby, F.A. et al., Taxonomy, at the click of a mouse, Nature, 418, 367, 2002.
69. Wheeler, Q.D., Lipscomb, D., and Platnick, N., Terascale taxonomy: cyber-infrastructure and the Linnaean legacy, in Proc. of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Systematics Association, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, 2003.
70. Tautz, D. et al., DNA points the way ahead in taxonomy, Nature, 418, 479, 2002.
71. Tautz D. et al., A plea for DNA taxonomy, Trends Ecol. Syst., 18, 70, 2003.
72. Lipscomb, D., Platnick N., and Wheeler, Q., The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy, Trends Ecol. Syst., 18, 65, 2003.
73. Stace, C.A., Plant taxonomy and biosystematics: does DNA provide all the answers? Taxon, 54, 999, 2005.