A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 717-724

  Savolainen, Vincent ^a   Chase, Mark W ^a  

^a JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA SEQUENCE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; FLOWER; FOSSIL; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT IDENTIFICATION; PLASTID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

EMBRYOPHYTA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0344861871     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.10.003     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Zurawski G., et al. The structure of the gene for the large subunit of ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase from spinach chloroplast DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:1981;3251-3270.
2. Chase M.W., et al. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 80:1993;528-580.
3. Pagel M. Inferring historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 401:1999;877-884.
4. Kyrpides N.C., Olsen G.L. Archaeal and bacterial hyperthermophiles: horizontal gene exchange or common ancestry? Trends Genet. 15:1999;298-299.
5. Wolf Y.I., et al. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet. 18:2002;472-479.
6. Hendy M.D., Penny D. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;310-321.
7. Huelsenbeck J.P. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;17-48.
8. Hillis D.M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature. 383:1996;130-131.
9. Hillis D.M. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;3-8.
10. Huelsenbeck J., Hillis D. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon cases. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;247-264.
11. Källersjö M., et al. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 213:1998;259-287.
12. Källersjö M., et al. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics. 15:1999;91-93.
13. Savolainen V., et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49:2000;306-362.
14. Savolainen V., et al. Phylogeny reconstruction and functional constraints in organellar genomes: plastid atpB and rbcL sequences versus animal mitochondrion. Syst. Biol. 51:2002;638-647.
15. Swofford D.L., et al. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D.M., et al. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinauer Associates Inc.
16. Yoder A.D., Yang Z. Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:2000;1081-1090.
17. Savolainen V., et al. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55:2000;257-309.
18. Goremykin V., et al. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support Gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;383-396.
19. Soltis D.E., et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 84:1997;1-49.
20. Soltis P.S., et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature. 402:1999;402-404.
21. Soltis D.E., et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133:2000;381-461.
22. Mathews S., Donoghue M.J. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science. 286:1999;947-950.
23. Qiu Y.-L., et al. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature. 402:1999;404-407.
24. Qiu Y.-L., et al. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analysis of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:2000;S3-S27.
25. Graham W.W., Olmstead R.G. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87:2000;1712-1730.
26. Soltis D.E., et al. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;32-42.
27. Palmer J.D. Evolution of chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA in plants and algae. MacIntyre R.J. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1985;131-240 Plenum Press.
28. Naylor G.J.P., Brown W.M. Structural biology and phylogenetic estimation. Nature. 388:1997;527-528.
29. Steel M., et al. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 49:2000;225-232.
30. Naylor G.J.P., Brown W.M. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;61-76.
31. Lockhart P.J., et al. A covariotide model explains apparent phylogenetic structure of oxygenic photosynthetic lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1998;1183-1188.
32. Lockhart P.J., et al. Spectral analysis, systematic bias, and the evolution of chloroplast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;573-576.
33. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 85:1998;531-553.
34. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141:2003;399-436.
35. Chase M.W., et al. Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon. 49:2000;685-704.
36. Goremykin V.V., et al. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:2003;1499-1505.
37. Donoghue M.J., Doyle J.A. Seed plant phylogeny: demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10:2000;R106-R109.
38. Friis E.M., et al. Fossil evidence of waterlilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous. Nature. 410:2001;357-360.
39. Sun G., et al. Archaefructaceae, a new basal angiosperm family. Science. 296:2002;899-904.
40. Bennett M.D. Plant genome values: how much do we know? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;2011-2016.
41. Leitch I.J., et al. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. (Lond.). 82:1998;85-94.
42. Palmer J.D., Delwiche C.R. The origin and evolution of plastids and their genomes. Soltis D.E., et al. Molecular Systematics of Plants II. 1998;375-409.
43. Cho Y., et al. Explosive invasion of plant mitochondria by a group I intron. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95:1998;14244-14249.
44. Cho Y.R., Palmer J.D. Multiple acquisitions via horizontal transfer of a group I intron in the mitochondrial cox1 gene during evolution of the Araceae family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1999;1155-1165.
45. Palmer J.D., et al. Dynamic evolution of mitochondrial genomes: mobile genes and introns and highly variable mutation rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;6960-6966.
46. Bennetzen J.L. Mechanisms and rates of genome expansion and contraction in flowering plants. Genetica. 115:2002;29-36.
47. Wendel J.F., et al. Feast and famine in plant genomes. Genetica. 115:2002;37-47.
48. Grant V. Plant Speciation. 1971;Columbia Press.
49. n-3′ in the evolution of a major radiation of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268:2001;1541-1546.
50. Zuckerlandl E., Pauling L. Molecular disease, evolution, and genetic heterogeneity. Kasha M., Pullman B. Horizons in Biochemistry. 1962;189-225 Academic Press.
51. Heckman D.S., et al. Molecular evidence for the early colonization of land by fungi and plants. Science. 293:2001;1129-1133.
52. Sanderson M.J. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;1218-1231.
53. Wikström N., et al. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268:2001;2211-2220.
54. Goremykin V.V., et al. Evolutionary analysis of 58 proteins encoded in six completely sequenced chloroplast genomes: revised molecular estimates of two seed plant divergence times. Plant Syst. Evol. 206:1997;337-351.
55. Sanderson M.J. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2002;101-109.
56. Britton T., et al. Phylogenetic dating with confidence intervals using mean path lengths. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 24:2002;58-65.
57. Magallón S., et al. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 86:1999;297-372.
58. Soltis P.S., et al. Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;4430-4435.
59. Pryer K.M., et al. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to the seed plants. Nature. 609:2001;618-622.
60. Sanderson M.J., Doyle J.A. Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data. Am. J. Bot. 88:2001;1499-1516.
61. Sanderson M., Donoghue M. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science. 264:1994;1590-1593.
62. Sanderson M.J., Wojciechowski M.F. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade - why are there so many species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83:1996;1488-1502.
63. Barraclough T.G., et al. Rate of rbcL gene sequence evolution and species diversification in flowering plants (angiosperms). Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 263:1996;589-591.
64. Savolainen V., Goudet J. Rate of gene sequence evolution and species diversification in flowering plants: a re-evalutation. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 265:1998;603-607.
65. Barraclough T.G., Savolainen V. Evolution rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution. 55:2001;677-683.
66. Magallón S., Sanderson M.J. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution. 55:2001;1762-1780.
67. Savolainen V., et al. Is cladogenesis heritable? Syst. Biol. 51:2002;835-843.
68. Bromham L., et al. Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies. Evolution. 56:2002;1921-1930.
69. Jobson R.W., Albert V.A. Molecular rates parallel diversification contrasts between carnivorous plant sister lineages. Cladistics. 18:2002;127-136.
70. Soltis D.E., et al. Missing links: the genetic architecture of flower and floral diversification. Trends Plant Sci. 7:2002;22-31.
71. Thorne J.L., Kishino H. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51:2002;689-702.