Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversification rates

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 855-865

  Chan, Kai M A ^a   Moore, Brian R ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cladogenesis; Differential diversification rates; Equal rates Markov random branching model; Supertrees; Tree balance indices; Tree shape

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0036959868     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102555     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (76)

1. BARRACLOUGH, T. G., P. H. HARVEY, AND S. NEE. 1996. Rate of rbcL gene sequence evolution and species diversification in flowering plants (angiosperms). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:589-591.
2. BARRACLOUGH, T. G., AND S. NEE. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:391-399.
3. BARRACLOUGH, T. G., AND V. SAVOLAINEN. 2001. Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution 55:677-683.
4. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., J. L. GITTLEMAN, AND A. PURVIS. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: A complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol. Rev. 74:143-175.
5. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., AND M. J. SANDERSON. 2001. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation parsimony analysis of supertree construction. Syst. Biol. 50:565-579.
6. BREMER, B., AND O. ERIKSSON. 1992. Evolution of fruit characters and dispersal modes in the tropical family Rubiaceae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 47:79-95.
7. CHAN, K., AND B. R. MOORE. 1999. Accounting for mode of speciation increases power and realism of tests of phylogenetic asymmetry. Am. Nat. 153:332-346.
8. CHAN, K., AND B. R. MOORE. 2002. SymmeTREE: A program for performing whole-tree tests of diversification rate variation. User manual. Available at www.eeb.princeton.edu/~kaichan/ or www.phylodiversity.org/brian/.
9. COLLESS, D. H. 1982. Review of Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, by E. O. Wiley. Syst. Zool. 31:100-104.
10. DODD, M. E., J. SILVERTOWN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53:732-744.
11. DONOGHUE, M. J., AND D. D. ACKERLY. 1996. Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:1241-1249.
12. EDGINGTON, E. S. 1972a. An additive method for combining probability values from independent experiments. J. Psychol. 80:351-363.
13. EDGINGTON, E. S. 1972b. A normal curve method for combining probability values from independent experiments. J. Psychol. 82:85-89.
14. EDGINGTON, E. S., AND O. HALLER. 1984. Combining probabilities from discrete probability distributions. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 44:265-274.
15. ERIKSSON, O., AND B. BREMER. 1991. Fruit characteristics, life forms, and species richness in the plant family Rubiaceae. Am. Nat. 138:751-761.
16. ERIKSSON, O., AND B. BREMER. 1992. Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms, and diversification rates in angiosperm families. Evolution 46:258-266.
17. FARRELL, B. D. 1998. "Inordinate fondness" explained: Why are there so many beetles? Science 281:555-559.
18. FARRELL, B. D., AND C. MITTER. 1998. The timing of insect/plant diversification: Might Tetraopes (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae) have co-evolved? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63:553-577.
19. FISHER, R. A. 1932. Statistical methods for research workers, 4th edition. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
20. FURNAS, G. W. 1984. The generation of random, binary unordered trees. J. Classi. 1:187-233.
21. FUSCO, G., AND Q. C. B. CRONK. 1995. A new method for evaluating the shape of large phylogenies. J. Theor. Biol. 175:235-243.
22. GOULD, S. J., D. M. RAUP, J. J. SEPOWSKI, T. J. M. SCHOPF, AND D. S. SIMBERLOFF. 1977. The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology 3:23-40.
23. HARDING, E. F. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 3:44-77.
24. HARVEY, P. H., E. C. HOLMES, A. Ø. MOOERS, AND S. NEE. 1994a. Inferring evolutionary processes from molecular phylogenies. Pages 313-333 in Models in phylogeny reconstruction (R. W. Scotland, D. J. Siebert, and D. M. Williams, eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. HARVEY, P. H., R. M. MAY, AND S. NEE. 1994b. Phylogenies without fossils. Evolution 48:523-529.
26. HARVEY, P. H., AND S. NEE. 1993. New uses for new phylogenies. Eur. Rev. 1:11-19.
27. HARVEY, P. H., AND S. NEE. 1994. Comparing real with expected patterns from molecular phylogenies. Pages 219-231 in Phylogenetics and ecology (P. Eggleton and R. I. Vane-Wright, eds.). Academic Press, London.
28. HARVEY, P. H., S. NEE, A. Ø. MOOERS, AND L. PARTRIDGE. 1991. These hierarchical views of life: Phylogenies and metapopulations. Pages 123-137 in Genes in ecology (R. J. Berry, T. J. Cranford, and G. M. Hewitt, eds.). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, U.K.
29. HEARD, S. B. 1992. Patterns in tree balance among cladistic, phenetic, and randomly generated phylogenetic trees. Evolution 46:1818-1826.
30. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana.
31. HEY, J. 1992. Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution 46:627-640.
32. HUELSENBECK, J. P., B. RANNALA, AND J. P. MASLY. 2000. Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288:2349-2350.
33. JONES K. E., A. PURVIS, A. MACLARNON, O. R. P. BININDA-EMONDS, AND N. B. SIMMONS. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biol. Rev. 77(2):223-259.
34. JUDD, W. S., R. W. SANDERS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: Preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harv. Pap. Bot. 1:1-51.
35. KELLEY, S. T., AND B. D. FARRELL. 1998. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 52:1731-1743.
36. KIRKPATRICK, M., AND M. SLATKIN. 1993. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 47:1171-1181.
37. KUBO, T., AND Y. IWASA. 1995. Inferring rates of branching and extinction from molecular phylogenies. Evolution 49:694-704.
38. Losos, J. B., AND F. R. ADLER. 1995. Stumped by trees? A generalized null model for patterns of organismal diversity. Am. Nat. 145:329-342.
39. MCKENZIE, A., AND M. STEEL. 2000. Distributions of cherries for two models of trees. Math. Biosci. 164: 81-92.
40. MINDELL, D. P., J. W. SITES, JR., AND D. GRAUR. 1989. Speciational evolution: A phylogenetic test with allozymes in Sceloporus (Reptilia). Cladistics 5:49-61.
41. MINDELL, D. P., AND C. E. THACKER. 1996. Rates of molecular evolution: Phylogenetic issues and applications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:279-303.
42. MOOERS, A.Ø. 1995. Tree balance and tree completeness. Evolution 49:379-384.
43. MOOERS, A. Ø., AND S. B. HEARD. 1997. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Q. Rev. Biol. 72:31-54.
44. NEE, S. 2001. Inferring speciation rates from phylogenies. Evolution 55:661-668.
45. NEE, S., T. G. BARRACLOUGH, AND P. H. HARVEY. 1996. Temporal changes in biodiversity: Detecting patterns and identifying causes. Pages 230-252 in Biodiversity: A biology of numbers and differences (K. J. Gaston, ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
46. NEE, S., E. C. HOLMES, R. M. MAY, AND P. H. HARVEY. 1994a. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344:77-82.
47. NEE, S., R. M. MAY, AND P. H. HARVEY. 1994b. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344:305-311.
48. NEE, S., A. Ø. MOOERS, AND P. H. HARVEY. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:8322-8326.
49. PAGE, R. D. M. 1991. Random dendrograms and null hypotheses in cladistic biogeography. Syst. Zool. 40:54-62.
50. PAGE, R. D. M. 1993. On describing the shape of rooted and unrooted trees. Cladistics 9:93-99.
51. PARADIS, E. 1997. Assessing temporal variations in diversification rates from phylogenies: Estimation and hypothesis testing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1141-1147.
52. PARADIS, E. 1998a. Detecting diversification rates without fossils. Am. Nat. 152:176-187.
53. PARADIS, E. 1998b. Testing for constant diversification rates using molecular phylogenies: A general approach based on statistical tests for goodness of fit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:476-479.
54. PURVIS, A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 348:405-421.
55. PURVIS, A., S. NEE, AND P. H. HARVEY. 1995. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260:329-333.
56. PYBUS, O. G., AND P. H. HARVEY. 2000. Testing macroevolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:2267-2272.
57. RAUP, D. M., S. J. GOULD, T. J. M. SCHOPF, AND D. S. SIMBERLOFF. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geol. 81:525-542.
58. RICKLEFS, R. E., AND S. S. RENNER. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48:1619-1636.
59. ROGERS, J. S. 1993. Response of Colless's tree imbalance to number of terminal taxa. Syst. Biol. 42:102-105.
60. ROGERS, J. S. 1994. Central moments and probability distribution of Colless' coefficient of tree imbalance. Evolution 48:2026-2036.
61. ROGERS, J. S. 1996. Central moments and probability distributions of three measures of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst. Biol. 45:99-110.
62. SANDERSON, M. J. 1994. Reconstructing the history of evolutionary processes using maximum likelihood. Pages 13-26 in Molecular evolution of physiological processes (D. M. Fambrough, ed.). Society of General Physiologists Series, Volume 49. Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York.
63. SANDERSON, M. J., AND G. BHARATHAN. 1993. Does cladistic information affect inferences about branching rates? Syst. Biol. 42:1-17.
64. SANDERSON, M. J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1996. Reconstructing shifts in diversification rates on phylogenetic trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:15-20.
65. SANDERSON, M. J., A. PURVIS, AND C. HENZE. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:105-109.
66. SAVOLAINEN, V., AND J. GOUDET. 1998. Rate of gene sequence evolution and species diversification in flowering plants: A re-evaluation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:603-607.
67. SHAO, K.-T., AND R. R. SOKAL. 1990. Tree balance. Syst. Zool. 39:266-276.
68. SLOWINSKI, J. B. 1990. Probabilities of n-trees under two models: Demonstration that asymmetrical interior nodes are not improbable. Syst. Zool. 39:89-94.
69. SLOWINSKI, J. B., AND C. GUYER. 1989a. Testing null models in questions of evolutionary success. Syst. Zool. 38:189-191.
70. SLOWINSKI, J. B., AND C. GUYER. 1989b. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: An improved null model. Am. Nat. 134:907-921.
71. SLOWINSKI, J. B., AND C. GUYER. 1993. Testing whether certain traits have caused amplified diversification: An improved method based on a model of random speciation and extinction. Am. Nat. 142:1019-1024.
72. STONE, J., AND J. REPKA. 1998. Using a nonrecursive formula to determine cladogram probabilities. Syst. Biol. 47:617-624.
73. STONER, C. J., O. R. P. BININDA-EMONDS, AND T. M. CARO. 2003. The adaptive significance of colouration in lagomorphs. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. (in press).
74. TIFFNEY, B. H., AND S. J. MAZER. 1995. Angiosperm growth habit, dispersal and diversification reconsidered. Evol. Ecol. 9:93-117.
75. WALLIS, W. A. 1942. Compounding probabilities from independent significance tests. Econometrica 10:229-248.
76. YULE, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213:21-87.