Attachment-informed supervision for social work field education

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 97-107

  Bennett, C Susanne ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attachment theory; Social work field education; Supervision; Supervisory working alliance

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049130882     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: 15733343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10615-007-0135-z     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, A., & Lyter, S. (1998). The use of constructive criticism in field supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 17, 43-57.
2. Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716.
3. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
4. Applegate, J., & Shapiro, J. (2006). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice. New York: Norton and Co.
5. Bennett, S. (2008). The interface of attachment, transference, and countertransference: Implications for the clinical supervisory relationship. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 78(2/3), in press.
6. Bennett, S., & Deal, K. (2008). Beginnings and endings in social work supervision: The interaction between attachment and developmental processes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 28(3/4), in press.
7. Bennett, S., Mohr, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., & Saks, L. (2008). General and supervision-specific attachment styles: Relations to student perceptions of social work field supervisors. Journal of Social Work Education., in press.
8. Bennett, S., & Saks, L. (2006). A conceptual application of attachment theory and research to the social work student-field instructor supervisory relationship. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(3), 157-169.
9. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
10. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation. New York: Basic Books.
11. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books.
12. Bordin, E. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35-42.
13. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.
14. Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships: A construct revisited. In: J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89-111). New York: Guilford.
15. Caspi, J., & Reid, W. (1998). The task-centered model for field instruction: An innovative approach. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 55-70.
16. Chang, C., Hays, D., & Shoffner, M. (2003). Cross-racial supervision: A developmental approach for white supervisors with supervisees of color. The Clinical Supervisor, 22, 121-138.
17. Chung, B., Marshall, J., & Gordon, L. (2001). Racial and gender biases in supervisory evaluation and feedback. The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 99-111.
18. Cozzarelli, C., Hoekstra, S., & Bylsma, W. (2000). General versus specific mental models of attachment: Are they associated with different outcomes? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 605-618.
19. Creasey, G., & Ladd, A. (2005). Generalized and specific attachment representations: Unique and interactive roles in predicting conflict behaviors in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1026-1038.
20. Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2000). Supervision of students: A map and model for decades to come. Journal of Social Work Education, 19, 437-449.
21. Deal, K. (2002). Modifying field instructors' supervisory approach using stage models of student development. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22, 121-137.
22. Dettlaff, A., & Dietz, T. (2004). Making training relevant: Identifying field instructor's perceived training needs. The Clinical Supervisor, 23(1), 15-32.
23. Eagle, M. (2003). Clinical implications of attachment theory. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23, 27-53.
24. Feeney, B., & Collins, N. (2004). Interpersonal safe haven and secure base caregiving processes in adulthood. In: S. Rholes & J. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 300-338). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Fonagy, P. (2003). The development of psychopathology from infancy to adulthood: The mysterious unfolding of disturbance in time. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 212-239.
26. Fortune, A., & Abramson, J. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 95-109.
27. Fortune, A., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111-124.
28. Foster, J. (2003). Attachment behavior and psychotherapy supervision. Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 64. (UMI No. 3082649).
29. Fraley, C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: A meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123-151.
30. Fraley, C., & Shaver, P. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.
31. Fraley, C., & Shaver, P. (1999). Loss and bereavement: Attachment theory and recent controversies concerning "grief work" and the nature of detachment. In: J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 735-759). New York: Guilford.
32. Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. (1999). Beyond parallel process: Relational perspectives on field instruction. Clinical Social Work Journal, 27, 231-246.
33. George, C., & Solomon, J. (1999). Attachment and caregiving: The caregiving behavioral system. In: J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 649-670). New York: Guilford.
34. Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: Historical and current perspectives. In: J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 395-433). New York: Guilford.
35. Kadushin, A. (1992). What's wrong, what's right with social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 10, 3-19.
36. Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
37. Klohnen, E., Weller, J., Luo, S., & Choe, M. (2005). Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1665-1682.
38. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 282-289.
39. Marvin, R., Cooper, G., Hoffman, K., & Powell, B. (2002). The circle of security project: Attachment-based intervention with caregiver-pre-school child dyads. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 107-124.
40. McCluskey, U. (2005). To be met as a person: The dynamics of attachment in professional encounters. London: Karnac Books.
41. Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision. (3rd ed.). New York: Haworth Press.
42. Neswald-McCalip, R. (1995). Development of the secure counselor: Case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins's (1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 18-27.
43. Nye, C. (2002). Using developmental processes in supervision: A psychodynamic approach. The Clinical Supervisor, 21, 39-53.
44. Ogles, B., Anderson, T., & Lunnen, K. (1999). The contribution of models and techniques to therapeutic efficacy: Contradictions between professional trends and clinical research. In: M. Hubble, B. Duncan, & S. Miller (Eds.), The heart & soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 201-225). Washington, DC: The American Psychological Association.
45. Perez-Foster, R. (1998). The clinician's cultural countertransference: The psychodynamics of culturally competent practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 26, 253-270.
46. Pistole, C., & Watkins, E. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 457-478.
47. Reynolds, B. (1942). Learning and teaching in the practice of social work. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.
48. Riggs, S., & Bretz, K. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 558-566.
49. Robinson, V. P. (1936). Supervision in social casework. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
50. Sable, P. (2000). Attachment and adult psychotherapy. Northvale: Jason Aronson.
51. Saari, C. (1989). The process of learning in clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 50, 35-49.
52. Schamess, G. (2006). On transference enactments in clinical supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34, 407-426.
53. Schore, A. (2000). Attachment and the regulation of the right brain. Attachment & Human Development, 2(1), 23-47.
54. Slade, A. (1999). Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults. In: J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 575-594). New York: Guilford.
55. Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
56. Tosone, C. (1997). Countertransference and clinical social work supervision: Contributions and considerations. The Clinical Supervisor, 16, 17-32.
57. Wall, J. (1994). Teaching termination to trainees through parallel process in supervision. The Clinical Supervision, 12, 27-37.
58. Watkins, E. (1995). Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 32, 333-340.
59. White, V., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education & Supervision, 42, 203-218.
60. Williams, A. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 425-435.