The task-centered model for field instruction?

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 55-70

  Caspi, Jonathan ^a   Reid, William J ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937266836     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1998.10778905     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abramson, J. S., & Fortune, A. E. (1990). Improving field instruction: An evaluation of a seminar for new field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 273-286.
2. Atwood, J. D. (1986). Self-awareness in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 4(3), 79-96.
3. Bogo, M. (1993). The student-field instructor relationship: The critical factor in field education. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(2), 23-36.
4. Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1987). The practice of field instruction in social work: Theory and process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
5. Brennen, E. C. (1982). Evaluation of field teaching and learning. In B. W. Sheafor & L. E. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work: Program development and maintenance (pp. 76-97). New York: Longman.
6. Cramer, E. P. (1995). Feminist pedagogy and teaching social work practice with groups: A case study .Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 11 (1/2), 193-215.
7. Curtis, G. C. (1996). The scientific evaluation of new claims. Research on Social Work Practice, 6(1), 117-121.
8. Davenport, J. A., & Davenport, J. (1988). Individualizing student supervision: The use of andragogical-pedagogical orientation questionnaires. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 2(2), 83-97.
9. Dea, K. L., Grist, M., & Myli, R. (1982). Learning tasks for practice competence. In B. W. Sheafor & L. E. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work: Program development and maintenance (pp. 237-261). New York: Longman.
10. Dore, M. M. (1994). Feminist pedagogy and the teaching of social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 97-106.
11. Elliot, R. (1984). A discovery-oriented approach to significant change events in psychotherapy: Interpersonal process recall and comprehensive process analysis. In L. Rice & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Patterns of change: Intensive analysis of psychotherapy process (pp. 249-286). New York: Guilford.
12. Ellison, M. L. (1994). Critical field instructor behaviors: Student and field instructor views. Arete, 75(2), 12-21.
13. Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 95-110.
14. Fortune, A. E., Feathers, C., Rook, S. R., Scrimenti, R. M., Smollen, P., Stemerman, B., & Tucker, E. L. (1985). Student satisfaction with field placement. Journal of Social Work Education, 21(3), 92-104.
15. Fox, R., & Zischka, P. C. (1989). The field instruction contract: A paradigm for effective learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 5(1), 103-116.
16. Freeman, E. M. (1985). The importance offeed back in clinical supervision: Implications for direct practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 5(1), 5-26.
17. Freeman, S. C. (1993). Structure in counseling supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 245-252.
18. Gitterman, A. (1989) .Field instruction in social work education: Issues, tasks and skills. The Clinical Supervisor, 7(4), 77-91.
19. Judah, E. H. (1982). Responsibilities of the student in field instruction. In B. W. Sheafor & L. E. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work: Program development and maintenance (pp. 144-160). New York: Longman.
20. Kadushin, A. E. (1992) .Supervision in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Kaplan, T. (1988). Group field instruction: Rationale and practical application. Social Work with Groups, 11(1/2), 125-143.
22. Kerson, T. S. (Ed.). (1994). Field instruction in social work settings. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
23. Knowles, M. S. (1972). Innovations in teaching styles and approaches based upon adult learning. Journal ofEducationfor Social Work, 8(2), 32-39.
24. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Kramer, B.J., & Wrenn, R. (1994). The blending of andragogical and pedagogical teaching methods in advanced social work practice courses. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 10(1/2), 43-64.
26. Larsen, J. (1980). Competency-based and task-centered practicum instruction, journal of Education for Social Work, 16(1), 87-94.
27. Larsen, J., & Hepworth, D. H. (1982). Enhancing the effectiveness of practicum instruction: An empirical study. Journal of Education for Social Work, 18(2), 50-58.
28. Lazzari, M. M. (1991). Feminism, empowerment, and field education. Affilia, 6(4), 71-87.
29. Manis, F. (1979). Openness in social work field instruction: Stance and form guidelines. Goleta, CA: Kimberly Press.
30. Marshack, E. F. (1986). Task supervision: A quiet revolution in field teaching of MSW students. Arete, 11, 45-50.
31. Marshack, E. F., & Glassman, U. (1991). Innovative models for field instruction: Departing from traditional methods. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glassman (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 84-95).
32. Alper, S. (1989). Mutual responsibility in supervision: A student workshop. Arete, 14, 52-56.
33. Matorin, S. (1979). Dimensions of student supervision: A point of view. Social Casework, 60(3), 150-156.
34. Munson, C. E. (1984). Stress among graduate social work students: An empirical study. Journal of Education for Social Work, 20(3), 20-29.
35. Munson, C. E. (1993). Clinical social work supervision. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
36. Naleppa, M. (1995). Task-centered case management for the elderly in the community: Developing a practice model. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany (#AAI9611495).
37. Parihar, B. (1984). Task-centered management in human services. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
38. Raskin, M. S. (Ed.). (1989). Empirical studies in field instruction. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
39. Raskin, M. S. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 75-89.
40. Reid, W. J. (1978). The task-centered system. New York: Columbia University Press.
41. Reid, W. J. (1992). Task strategies: An empirical approach to clinical social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. Reid, W. J., & Epstein, L. (1972). Task-centered casework. New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Shatz, E. O. (1989). Preface. In M. S. Raskin (Ed.), Empirical studies in field instruction (pp. xxv-xxvii). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
44. Sheafor, B. W., & Jenkins, L. E. (Eds.). (1982). Quality field instruction in social work: Program development and maintenance. New York: Longman.
45. Shulman, L. (1993). Teaching the helping skills: A field instructor’s guide. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
46. Stuyvesant, R. (1980). Study of an integrative teaching approach in social work education. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
47. Thomas, E.J. (1989). Advances in developmental research. Social Service Review, 63(4), 578-598.
48. Thomas, E.J., & Rothman, J. (1994). An integrative perspective on intervention research. In J. Rothman & E.J. Thomas (Eds.), Intervention research: Design and development for human service (pp. 3-23). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
49. Vayda, E., & Bogo, M. (1991). A teaching model to unite classroom and field. Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 271-278.
50. Wilson, S. (1981). Field instruction: Techniques for supervisors. New York: Free Press.
51. Wodarski, J. S., Feit, M. D., & Green, R. K. (1995). Graduate social work education: A review of two decades of empirical research and considerations for the future. Social Service Review, 69(1), 108-130.