Beyond parallel process: Relational perspectives on field instruction

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 231-246

  Ganzer, Carol ^a   Ornstein, Eric D ^b  

^a Chicago Christian Industrial League   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical supervision; Field instruction; Parallel process; Relational perspectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033457067     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022886118408     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allphin, C. (1987). Perplexing or distressing episodes in supervision: How they can help in the teaching and learning of psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 15, 236-45.
2. Berman, E. (1998). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 161-186. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
3. Casement, P. (1993). Towards autonomy: Some thoughts on psychoanalytic supervision. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 2, 389-403.
4. Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
5. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: International University Press.
6. Fiscalini, J. (1997). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic Supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 29-51. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
7. Fosshage, J. L. (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-psychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 189-210. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
8. Gabbard, G. O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76, 475-485.
9. Hoffman, I. Z. (1992). Some practical implications of a social constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2, 287-304.
10. Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 389-422.
11. Kahn, E. (1979). The parallel process in social work treatment and supervision. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 60, 520-528.
12. Large, D. (1963). Four processes of field instruction in casework: The field instructor's contribution to instructor-student interaction in second-year field work. Social Service Review, 37, 263-273.
13. Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Ornstein, E., & Ganzer, C. (1997). Mitchell's relational conflict model: An analysis of its usefulness in clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 391-405.
15. Rock, M. H. (1997). Effective supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 107-132. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
16. Rosbrow, T. (1997). From parallel process to developmental process: A developmental/plan formulation approach to supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and the supervisee, pp. 213-236. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
17. Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 15, 135-146.
18. Searles, H. F. (1962). Problems of psychoanalytic supervision. In Collected papers on schizophrenia and related subjects. New York: International Universities Press.
19. Williams, A. B. (1997). On parallel process in social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 25, 425-435.
20. Woods, M. E., & Hollis, F. (1990). Casework: A psychosocial therapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.