Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading

Australian Dental Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 218-222

  Palamara, J E A ^a   Palamara, D ^a   Messer, H H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Finite element analysis; Marginal ridge; Strain; Strain gauge

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRUXISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH CROWN; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; BRUXISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH CROWN; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0036717680     PISSN: 00450421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00332.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tidmarsh BG. Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Endo 1976;2:374-375.
2. Eshleman JR, Janus CE, Jones CR, Tooth preparation designs for resin-bonded fixed partial dentures related to enamle thickness. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:18-22.
3. Hansen AR, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:49-55.
4. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro M, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:419-422.
5. Morin DL, Cross M, Voller VR, Douglas WH, DeLong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: modelling and analysis. Dent Mater 1988;4:77-84.
6. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-516.
7. Grippo JO. Bioengineering seeds of contemplation: a private practitioner's perspective. Dent Mater 1996;12:198-202.
8. Darendeliler S, Darendeliler H, Kinoglu T. Analysis of a central maxillary incisor using a three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:371-383.
9. Goel VK, Khera SC, Singh K. Clinical implications of the response of enamel and dentin to masticatory loads. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:446-454.
10. Kaewsuriyathumrong C, Soma K. Stress of tooth and PDL structure created by bite force. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1993;40:217-232.
11. Thresher RW, Saito GE. The stress analysis of human teeth. J Biomech 1973;6:443-449.
12. Arola D, Galles LA, Sarubin MF. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent 2001;29:63-73.
13. Sakaguchi RL, Brust EW, Cross M, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1991;7:186-190.
14. Palamara D, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater 2000;16:412-419.
15. Craig RG. Mechanical properties. In: Restorative Dental Materials. 9th ed. Mosby-Year Book Inc, 1993:54-106.
16. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983;62:32-36.
17. Benham PP, Crawford RJ. Mechanics of Engineering Materials. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longmans Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1988:236-238.
18. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications, Int Dent J 1991;41:25-32.
19. Palamara D, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Pintado M, Messer HH. Effect of stress on acid dissolution of enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:109-115.