Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 281-286

  Soares, Carlos José ^a   Martins, Luis Roberto Marcondes ^b   Pfeifer, Jesuânia Maria Guardiero Azevedo ^a   Giannini, Marcelo ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Fracture resistance; Indirect composite; Indirect restorations; Inlays; Resin cement

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; EVALUATION; HUMIDITY; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH FILLING;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MOLAR; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATE CEMENT; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 1642321825     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Burke FJ, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1994;25:335-340.
2. Burke FJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crown: The effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 1996;27:115-121.
3. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer J-M, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:823-831.
4. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: The effect of alternative luting procedures. Quintessence Int 1994;25:269-275.
5. Burke FJ. The effects of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293-300.
6. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC. The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays. Oper Dent 1993;18:230-236.
7. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:167-171.
8. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:41-56.
9. Chalifoux PR. Treatment considerations for posterior laboratory- fabricated resin restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:969-978.
10. Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fiber-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1998;6:55-62.
11. Touati B, Miara P. Um nuevo sistema cerómero para restauraciones inlay/onlay. Signature Int 1998;3:7-11.
12. Mak M, Qualtrough AJE, Burke FJ. The effect of different ceramic materials on the fracture resistance of dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int 1997;28:197-203.
13. Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:297-307.
14. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
15. Miara P. Aesthetic guidelines for second-generation indirect inlay and onlay composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:423-431.
16. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:573-581.
17. Touati B. The evolution of aesthetic materials for inlays and onlays: A review. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8:657-666.
18. Touati B, Aidan N. Second-generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-118.
19. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Schneider-Feyrer S, Handel G. In-vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced adhesive fixed partial inlay dentures. J Dent 1999;27:163-168.
20. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Comparative evaluation of secondary heat treatment and a high intensity light source for the improvement of properties of prosthetic composite. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:288-293.
21. Zhou S-M, Hu H-P, Wang Y-F. Analysis of stresses and breaking loads for Class I cavity preparations in mandibular first molars. Quintessence Int 1989;20:205-210.
22. Reagan SE, Schawandt NW, Duncanson MG. Fracture resistance of wide-isthmus mesio-occluso-distal preparation with and without amalgam cuspal coverage. Quintessence Int 1989;20:469-472.
23. Mühlemann HR. Ten years of tooth mobility measurements. J Periodontol 1960;31:110-122.
24. Mühlemann HR, Zander HA. Tooth mobility III. The mechanism of tooth mobility. J Periodont 1954;25:128-131.
25. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:619-626.
26. Scherrer SS. Effect of cement films thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994;10:172-177.