Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students' prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 79-100

  Rivet, Ann E ^a   Krajcik, Joseph S ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Curriculum development; Middle school science; Physical science; Problem based learning

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM RESEARCH; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE;

CURRICULA; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 38849173240     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20203     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, J.A., Reder, L.M., & Simon, H.A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25, 5-11.
2. Blumenfeld, P.C., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164.
3. Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Patrick, H., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Teaching for understanding. In: B.J. Biddle, T.L. Good, & I.F. Goodson (Eds.). International handbook of teachers and teaching (vol. 2 pp. 819-878). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
5. Bouillion, L.M., & Gomez, L.M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898.
6. Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
7. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992a). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics: Theoretical basis, developmental projects, and initial research findings. In: R. Duschl, & R. Hamilton (Eds.). Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 244-273). New York: SUNY Press.
9. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992b). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291-315.
10. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator (Winter), 6-11, 38-48.
13. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
14. Edelson, D.C, Gordin, D.N., & Pea, R.D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
15. Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860-877.
16. Hmelo, C.E., Holton, D.L., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247-298.
17. Kolodner, J.L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In A.S. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J.L. Kolodner, & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of ICLS98: International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Atlanta, GA, December 16-19, 1998 (pp. 16-22). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
18. Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179-212.
19. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483-497.
20. Krajcik, J., Czemiak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
21. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In: A. Krapp, & S. Hidi, & K.A. Renninger (Eds.). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning in open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 61-78.
23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lee, H.-S., & Songer, N.B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 923-948.
25. Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-grade science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 303-318.
26. Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In: B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.). International handbook of science education (vol. 1 pp. 265-294). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
27. Linn, M.C (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 781-796.
28. Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.
29. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358.
30. Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J.S., Fishman, B.J., Soloway, E., & Geier, R, et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1063-1080.
31. McGilly, K. (1994). Cognitive science and educational practice: An introduction. In: K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (p 317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Rivet, A.E. (2006). Teachers' use of contextualizing instruction in middle school projectbased science classrooms Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
34. Rivet, A.E. (in review). Contextualizing instruction: Connecting to urban students' ideas and experiences. Journal of the Learning Sciences.
35. Rivet, A.E., & Krajcik, J.S. (2004). Contextualizing instruction in project-based science: Activating students' prior knowledge and experiences to support learning. In: Y.B. Kafai, W.A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A.S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.). Embracing diversity in the learning sciences: The proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2004). Santa Monica, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Schneider, R.M. (2001). The role of curriculum materials in reforming science education Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
37. Schneider, R.M., the Center for Highly Interactive Computing in Education (HICE). (2001). Why do I need to wear a helmet when I ride my bike? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan School of Education.
38. Sherwood, R., Kinzer, C.K., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1987). Some benefits of creating macro-contexts for science instruction: Initial findings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 417-435.
39. Singer, J., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35, 165-178.
40. Songer, N.B. (1993). Learning science with a child-focused resource: A case study of kids as global scientists In Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of the Cognitive Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.