The collider principle in causal reasoning: Why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 434-449

  Burns, Bruce D ^a   Wieth, Mareike ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LOGIC; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED STATES;

CAUSALITY; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LOGIC; MICHIGAN; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 4444280865     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.434     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bar-Hillel, M., & Falk, R. (1982). Some teasers concerning conditional probabilities. Cognition, 11, 109-122.
2. Bar-Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (1996). Why are people reluctant to exchange lottery tickets? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 17-27.
3. Berkson, J. (1946). Limitations of the application of fourfold table analysis to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 47-53.
4. Brown, N. J., Read, D., & Summers, B. (2003). The lure of choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 297-308.
5. Burns, B. D. (2004). Heuristics as beliefs and as behaviors: The adaptiveness of the "hot hand." Cognitive Psychology, 48, 295-331.
6. Burns, B. D., & Corpus, B. (2004). Randomness and inductions from streaks: "Gambler's fallacy" versus "hot hand." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 179-184.
7. Burns, B. D., & Wieth, M. (2000, November). The Monty Hall dilemma: A causal explanation for a cognitive illusion. Poster session presented at the Forty-first Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
8. Burns, B. D., & Wieth, M. (2001). [The effect of an explicit ordering of options in the Monty Hall Dilemma.] Unpublished raw data.
9. Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271-280.
10. Clarkin, J. F., & Kendall, P. C. (1992). Comorbidity and treatment planning: Summary and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 904-908.
11. Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Falk, R. (1992). A closer look at the probabilities of the notorious three prisoners. Cognition, 43, 197-223.
13. Franco-Watkins, A. M., Derks, P. L., & Dougherty, M. R. P. (2003). Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 67-90.
14. Friedman, D. (1998). Monty Hall's three doors: Construction and deconstruction of a choice anomaly. The American Economic Review, 88, 933-946.
15. Geiger, M. A. (1997). Educators' warnings about changing examination answers: Effects on student perceptions and performance. College Student Journal, 31, 429-432.
16. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
17. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704.
18. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Chen, S. (1995). Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the "Monty Hall" problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 185-190.
19. Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-314.
20. Glymour, C. N. (2001). The mind's arrow: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Granberg, D. (1999). Cross-cultural comparison of responses to the Monty Hall dilemma. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 431-438.
22. Granberg, D., & Brown, T. A. (1995). The Monty Hall dilemma. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 711-723.
23. Granberg, D., & Dorr, N. (1998). Further exploration of two-stage decision making in the Monty Hall dilemma. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 561-579.
24. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case of frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372-1388.
25. Hell, W., & Heinrichs, C. (2000). Das Monty-Hall-Dilemma (Ziegenproblem) mit 30 Türen [The Monty Hall dilemma (goat problem) with 30 doors]. In D. Vorberg, A. Fuchs, T. Futterer, A. Heinecke, U. Heinrich, U. Mattler, & S. Töllner (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie (p. 82). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst.
26. Jensen, P. S. (2003). Comorbidity and child psychopathology: Recommendations for the next decade. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 293-300.
27. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J.-P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62-88.
28. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582-591.
30. Krauss, S., & Wang, X. T. (2003). The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 3-22.
31. Laming, D. (1996). On the analysis of irrational data selection: A critique of Oaksford and Chater (1994). Psychological Review, 103, 364-373.
32. Lau, R. R., & Russell, D. (1980). Attributions in the sports pages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 29-38.
33. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2003). Comorbidity between and within childhood externalizing and internalizing disorders: Reflections and directions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 285-291.
34. Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181-194.
35. Mathews, C. O. (1929). Erroneous first impressions on objective tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 280-286.
36. McAuley, E., & Gross, J. B. (1983). Perceptions of causality in sport: An application of the Causal Dimension Scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 72-76.
37. Morgan, J. P., Chaganty, N. R., Dahiya, R. C., & Doviak, M. J. (1991). Let's make a deal: The player's dilemma. The American Statistician, 45, 284-287.
38. Nickerson, R. S. (1996). Ambiguities and unstated assumptions in probabilistic reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 410-433.
39. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
40. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Rational explanation of the selection task. Psychological Review, 103, 381-391.
41. Page, S. E. (1998). Let's make a deal. Economics Letters, 61, 175-180.
42. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
43. Pennington, N., & Hasties, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521-533.
44. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions: How mistakes of reason rule our minds (M. Piattelli-Palmarini & K. Botsford, Trans.). New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1993)
45. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
46. Rehder, B. (2003). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709-748.
47. Sadetzki, S., Bensal, D., Novikov, I., & Modan, B. (2003). The limitations of using hospital controls in cancer etiology-one more example for Berkson's bias. European Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 1127-1131.
48. Schwartzbaum, J., Ahlbom, A., & Feychting, M. (2003). Berkson's bias reviewed. European Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 1109-1112.
49. Schechter, B. (1998). My brain is open: The mathematical journeys of Paul Erdõs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
50. Selvin, S. (1975a). A problem in probability [Letter to the editor]. The American Statistician, 29, 67.
51. Selvin, S. (1975b). On the Monty Hall problem [Letter to the editor]. The American Statistician, 29, 134.
52. Shanks, D. R., Medin, D. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Shaughnessy, J. M., & Dick, T. (1991). Monty's dilemma: Should you stick or switch? Mathematics Teacher, 84, 252-256.
54. Spellman, B. A., & Mandel, D. R. (1999). When possibility informs reality: Counterfactual thinking as a cue to causality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 120-123.
55. Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (Eds.). (1995). Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Coulson, R. L., & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 498-531). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sternberg, R. J., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2001). Complex cognition: The psychology of human thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Tor, A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2003). Focusing failures in competitive environments: Explaining decision errors in the Monty Hall game, the acquiring a company problem, and multiparty ultimatums. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 353-374.
59. Tubau, E., & Alonso, D. (2003). Overcoming illusory inferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem: The role of explicit representations. Memory & Cognition, 31, 596-607.
60. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 49-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. vos Savant, M. (1997). The power of logical thinking. New York: St. Martin's Press.
62. Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of several "insight" problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169-192.
63. White, S. A. (1993). The effect of gender and age on causal attribution in softball players. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 49-58.
64. Wickens, T. D. (1989). Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.