LTHREADER: Prediction of extracellular ligand-receptor interactions in cytokines using localized threading

Protein Science

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 279-292

  Pulim, Vinay ^a   Bienkowska, Jadwiga ^a,b   Berger, Bonnie ^a,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

4 helical bundles; Cytokines; Protein interactions; Statistical scores; Threading; TNF like

Indexed keywords

BETA PROTEIN; CYTOKINE; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; IMMUNOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYTOKINES; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 38649114648     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.073178108     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adamczak, R., Porollo, A., and Meller, J. 2005. Combining prediction of secondary structure and solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins 59: 467-475.
2. Aloy, P. and Russell, R.B. 2002. Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 5896-5901.
3. Aloy, P. and Russell, R.B. 2003. InterPreTS: Protein interaction prediction through tertiary structure. Bioinformatics 19: 161-162.
4. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
5. Aytuna, A.S., Gursoy, A., and Keskin, O. 2005. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 21: 2850-2855.
6. Berman, H.M., Battistuz, T., Bhat, T.N., Bluhm, W.F., Bourne, P.E., Burkhardt, K., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G.L., Iype, L., Jain, S., et al. 2002. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58: 899-907.
7. Bienkowska, J. and Lathrop, R. 2005. Threading algorithms. In Encyclopedia of genetics, genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics (eds. M. Dunn et al.), pp. 3555-3568. J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
8. Bossen, C., Ingold, K., Tardivel, A., Bodmer, J.L., Gaide, O., Hertig, S., Ambrose, C., Tschopp, J., and Schneider, P. 2006. Interactions of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNF receptor family members in the mouse and human. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 13964-13971.
9. Bowie, J.U., Luthy, R., and Eisenberg, D. 1991. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 253: 164-170.
10. Caffrey, D.R., Somaroo, S., Hughes, J.D., Mintseris, J., and Huang, E.S. 2004. Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? Protein Sci. 13: 190-202.
11. Canutescu, A.A., Shelenkov, A.A., and Dunbrack Jr., R.L. 2003. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12: 2001-2014.
12. Davis, F.P. and Sali, A. 2005. PIBASE: A comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 21: 1901-1907.
13. Davis, F.P., Braberg, H., Shen, M.Y., Pieper, U., Sali, A., and Madhusudhan, M.S. 2006. Protein complex compositions predicted by structural similarity. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 2943-2952. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl353.
14. Fischer, D. 2000. Hybrid fold recognition: Combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 5: 119-130.
15. Goh, C.S., Bogan, A.A., Joachimiak, M., Walther, D., and Cohen, F.E. 2000. Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J. Mol. Biol. 299: 283-293.
16. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. 1992. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919.
17. Higgins, D.G. and Sharp, P.M. 1988. CLUSTAL: A package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73: 237-244.
18. Hymowitz, S.G., Christinger, H.W., Fuh, G., Ultsch, M., O'Connell, M., Kelley, R.F., Ashkenazi, A., and de Vos, A.M. 1999. Triggering cell death: The crystal structure of Apo2L/TRAIL in a complex with death receptor 5. Mol. Cell 4: 563-571.
19. Janin, J. 2005. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: The CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci. 14: 278-283.
20. Jones, D.T. 1999. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 797-815.
21. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
22. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
23. Kohlbacher, O. and Lenhof, H.P. 2000. BALL - rapid software prototyping in computational molecular biology. Biochemicals algorithms library. Bioinformatics 16: 815-824.
24. Lathrop, R.H. and Smith, T.F. 1996. Global optimum protein threading with gapped alignment and empirical pair score functions. J. Mol. Biol. 255: 641-665.
25. Lathrop, R.H., Rogers Jr., R.G., Smith, T.F., and White, J.V. 1998. A Bayes-optimal sequence-structure theory that unifies protein sequence-structure recognition and alignment. Bull. Math. Biol. 60: 1039-1071.
26. Lichtarge, O., Bourne, H.R., and Cohen, F.E. 1996. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257: 342-358.
27. Lu, L., Lu, H., and Skolnick, J. 2002. MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading. Proteins 49: 350-364.
28. Lu, H., Lu, L., and Skolnick, J. 2003. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys. J. 84: 1895-1901.
29. Mendez, R., Leplae, R., De Maria, L., and Wodak, S.J. 2003. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: Current status of docking methods. Proteins 52: 51-67.
30. Murthy, S., Kasif, S., and Saltzberg, S. 1994. A system for induction of oblique decision trees. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2: 1-32.
31. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
32. Olmea, O., Rost, B., and Valencia, A. 1999. Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 293: 1221-1239.
33. Panchenko, A.R., Marchler-Bauer, A., and Bryant, S.H. 2000. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 296: 1319-1331.
34. Pazos, F., Helmer-Citterich, M., Ausiello, G., and Valencia, A. 1997. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 271: 511-523.
35. Pestka, S., Krause, C.D., and Walter, M.R. 2004. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol. Rev. 202: 8-32.
36. Pieper, U., Eswar, N., Davis, F.P., Braberg, H., Madhusudhan, M.S., Rossi, A., Marti-Renom, M., Karchin, R., Webb, B.M., Eramian, D., et al. 2006. MODBASE: A database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: D291-D295. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj059.
37. Ponder, J.W. and Case, D.A. 2003. Force fields for protein simulations. Adv. Protein Chem. 66: 27-85.
38. Przybylski, D. and Rost, B. 2004. Improving fold recognition without folds. J. Mol. Biol. 341: 255-269.
39. Qi, Y., Klein-Seetharaman, J., and Bar-Joseph, Z. 2005. Random forest similarity for protein-protein interaction prediction from multiple sources. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 531-542.
40. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
41. Singh, R., Xu, J., and Berger, B. 2006. Struct2Net: Integrating structureInto protein-protein interaction prediction. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 11: 403-414.
42. Smith, G.R. and Sternberg, M.J. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 28-35.
43. Summa, C.M., Levitt, M., and Degrado, W.F. 2005. An atomic environment potential for use in protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 352: 986-1001.
44. Tan, S.H., Zhang, Z., and Ng, S.K. 2004. ADVICE: Automated detection and validation of interaction by co-evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: W69-W72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh471.
45. von Öhsen, N. and Zimmer, R. 2001. Improving profile-profile alignments via log average scoring. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics. Springer-Verlag, London.
46. Winter, C., Henschel, A., Kim, W.K., and Schroeder, M. 2006. SCOPPI: A structural classification of protein-protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: D310-D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj099.
47. Xu, J., Li, M., Kim, D., and Xu, Y. 2003a. RAPTOR: Optimal protein threading by linear programming. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 1: 95-117.
48. Xu, J., Li, M., Lin, G., Kim, D., and Xu, Y. 2003b. Protein threading by linear programming. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 8: 264-275.
49. Ye, Y. and Godzik, A. 2005. Multiple flexible structure alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 21: 2362-2369.
50. Zhang, Y., Arakaki, A.K., and Skolnick, J. 2005. TASSER: An automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins (Suppl. 7) 61: 91-98.