Windows-based real-time control of direct-drive mechanisms: Platform description and experiments

Mechatronics

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1021-1036

  Campa, Ricardo ^a   Kelly, Rafael ^a   Santibañez, Victor ^b  

^a Adm 1   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE LA LAGUNA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Direct drive mechanism; Experimental evaluation; Performance; Real time systems

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FACTORY AUTOMATION; MECHATRONICS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; POSITION CONTROL; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; TORQUE CONTROL; TRACKING (POSITION);

DIRECT-DRIVE SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION; PLATFORM;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 3843063411     PISSN: 09574158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2004.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sciavicco L., Siciliano B. Modeling and control of robot manipulators. 2nd ed. 2000;Springer-Verlag.
2. Bellini C, Panepinto F, Panzieri S, Ulivi G. Exploiting a real-time Linux platform in controlling robotic manipulators. In: Proceedings 15th IFAC Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 2002.
3. Macchelli A, Melchiorri C. A real-time control system for industrial robots and control applications based on real-time Linux. In: Proceedings 15th IFAC Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 2002.
4. Costescu N., Dawson D., Loffler M. QMotor 2,0 - a real-time PC based control environment. IEEE Contr. Syst. 19(3):1999;68-76.
5. Loffler M., Costescu N., Dawson D. Qmotor 3.0 and the Qmotor Robotic Toolkit: a PC-based control platform. IEEE Contr. Syst. 22(3):2002;12-25.
6. Monroy C., Campa R., Kelly R. An application of real-time control systems to robotics. Robotica. 19:2001;323-329.
7. Hong K.S., Choi K.H., Kim J.G., Lee S. A PC-based open robot control system: PC-ORC. Robot. Comput. Integrat. Manufact. 17:2001;355-365.
8. Koditscheck DE. Natural motion for robot arms. In: Proceedings of the 1984 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, NV, December 1984. p. 733-5.
9. Slotine J.J., Li W. On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 6(3):1987;49-59.
10. VenturCom Inc. RTX 4.3 User's Guide. VenturCom, Inc., Cambridge, MA, 1999.
11. Spong M.W., Vidyasagar M. Robot dynamics and control. 1989;John Wiley and Sons.
12. Paden B., Panja R. Globally asymptotically stable PD+ controller for robot manipulators. Int. J. Contr. 7(6):1988;1697-1712.
13. Whitcomb L.L., Rizzi A.A., Koditschek D.E. Comparative experiments with a new adaptive controller for robot arms. IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 9(1):1993;59-70.
14. Spong M., Ortega R., Kelly R. Comments on "Adaptive manipulator control: A case study" IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 35(6):1990;761-762.
15. Egeland O., Godhavn J.M. A note on Lyapunov stability for an adaptive robot controller. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 39(8):1994;1671-1673.
16. Reyes F., Kelly R. Experimental evaluation of model-based controllers on a direct-drive robot arm. Mechatronics. 11:2001;267-282.
17. Dawson D.M., Carroll J.J., Schneider M. Integrator backstepping control of a brush dc motor turning a robotic load. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol. 2(3):1994;233-244.
18. de Queiroz M.S., Dawson D., Burg T. Reexamination of the DCAL controller for rigid link robots. Robotica. 14:1996;41-49.
19. Jaritz A., Spong M.W. An experimental comparison of robust control algorithms on a direct drive manipulator. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol. 4(6):1996;627-640.