The spatial representation of dynamic scenes - An integrative approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4387 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 140-155

  Huff, Markus ^a   Schwan, Stephan ^a   Garsoffky, Bärbel ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARAMETER ESTIMATION; VISUALIZATION;

DYNAMIC SCENES; SCENE RECOGNITION; VIEWPOINT DEPENDENCY;

IMAGE RECOGNITION;

EID: 38349056381     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75666-8_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115-147 (1987)
2. Biederman, I., Bar, M.: One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research 39, 2885-2899 (1999)
3. Christou, C.G., Bülthoff, H.H.: View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition 27(6), 996-1007 (1999)
4. Diwadkar, V.A., McNamara, T.P.: Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science 8, 302-307 (1997)
5. Easton, R.D., Sholl, M.J.: Object-array strucure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 21, 483-500 (1995)
6. Evans, G.W., Pezdek, K.: Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 13-24 (1980)
7. Garsoffky, B., Huff, M., Schwan, S.: Changing viewpoints during dynamic events. Perception 36, 366-374 (2007)
8. Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., Hesse, F.W.: Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28, 1035-1050 (2002)
9. Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S., Hesse, F.W.: Does the viewpoint deviation effect diminish if canonical viewpoints are used for the presentation of dynamic sequences? In: Forbus, K., Gentner, D., Regier, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 428-433. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)
10. Gernsbacher, M.A.: Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 17, 324-363 (1985)
11. Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston, Houghton Mifflin (1979)
12. Green, D., Swets, J.: Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, Oxford (1966)
13. Hannigan, S.L., Reinitz, M.T.: A demonstration and comparison of two types of inference-based memory errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27, 931-940 (2001)
14. Hayward, W.G.: After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 425-427 (2003)
15. Huff, M.: Verbal Influences on the recognition of dynamic scenes (Unpublished manuscript)
16. Huff, M., Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S.: The viewpoint dependency of traffic scenes (Unpublished manuscript)
17. Huff, M., Garsoffky, B., Schwan, S.: The influence of the serial order of visual and verbal presentation on the verbal overshadowing effect of dynamic scenes. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1539-1544. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)
18. Jenkins, J.J., Wald, J., Pittenger, J.B.: Apprehending pictorial events: An instance of psychological cohesion. In: Savage, C.W. (ed.) Perception and cognition: Issues in the foundations of psychology, Minneapolis, pp. 129-163. University of Minnesota Press (1978)
19. McNamara, T.P.: How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K. (eds.) Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning, pp. 174-191. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
20. Mou, W., McNamara, T.P.: Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28, 162-170 (2002)
21. Newtson, D.: Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 28-38 (1973)
22. Posner, M.I., W., S, K.: On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77, 353-363 (1968)
23. Schwan, S., Garsoffky, B.: Event segmentation and memory. In: Shipley, T., Zacks, J. (eds.) Understanding events: How humans see, represent, and act on events, Oxford University Press, New York (in press)
24. Shelton, A.L., McNamara, T.P.: Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology 43, 274-310 (2001)
25. Shelton, A.L., McNamara, T.P.: Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 30, 158-170 (2004)
26. Sholl, M.J., Nolin, T.L.: Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23, 1494-1507 (1997)
27. Simons, D.S., Wang, R.F., Roddenberry, D.: Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 521-530 (2002)
28. Tarr, M. J.: Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2, 55-82 (1995)
29. Worboys, M., Hornsby, K.: From objects to events: GEM, the geospatial event model. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on GIScience, Phelps Hall: NCGIA (2004)
30. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., Iyer, G.: Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(1), 29-58 (2001)