View dependence in scene recognition after active learning

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 996-1007

  Christou, Chris G ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; RECOGNITION; SIMULATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOPOGRAPHY; TRAINING;

EID: 0344718667     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03201230     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ALOIMONOS, Y. (1993). Active perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. APPLEYARD, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment & Behavior, 2, 100-118.
3. ARTHUR, E. J. (1996). Orientation specificity in the mental representation of three-dimensional environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis St. Paul.
4. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
5. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1992). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
6. BLAKE, A., & YUILLE, A. (1992). Active vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. BRUCE, P. R., & HERMAN, J. F. (1983). Spatial knowledge of young and elderly adults: Scene recognition from familiar and novel perspectives. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 169-173.
8. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 3, 247-260.
9. CHANCE, S. S., GAUNET, F., BEALL, A. C., & LOOMIS, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs in path integration. Presence: Special Issue on Navigation, 7, 168-178.
10. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). View dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
11. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. HOCK, H. S., & SCHMELZKOPF, K. F. (1980). The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition, 8, 543-554.
13. LEE, D. N. (1974). Visual information during locomotion. In R. B. MacLeod & H. Pick (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honour of J. J. Gibson. New York: Cornell University Press.
14. MACMILLAN, N. A., & CREELMAN, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. MAGUIRE, E. A., FRITH, C. D., BURGESS, N., DONNET, J. G., & O'KEEFE, J. (1998). Knowing where things are: Parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 61-76.
16. MAY, M., PÉRUCH, P., & SAVOYANT, A. (1995). Navigating in a virtual environment with map-acquired knowledge: Encoding and alignment effects. Ecological Psychology, 7, 21-36.
17. O'KEEFE, J. O., & NADEL, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
18. PÉRUCH, P., & GAUNET, F. (1998). Virtual environments as a promising tool for investigating human spatial cognition. Current Psychology of Cognition, 17, 881-899.
19. PÉRUCH, P., VERCHER, J. L., & GAUTHIER, G. M. (1995). Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments. Ecological Psychology, 1, 1-20.
20. PIAGET, J., & INHELDER, B. (1967). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.
21. POGGIO, T., & EDELMAN, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
22. RIESER, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
23. ROCK, I., & DIVITA, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centred object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
24. ROSKOS-EWOLDSON, B., MCNAMARA, T. P., SHELTON, A. L., & CARR, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 215-226.
25. ROWLAND, G. L., FRANKEN, R. E., BOUCHARD, L. M., & SOOKOCHOFF, M. B. (1978). Recognition of familiar scenes from new perspectives. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 46, 2, 1287-1292.
26. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
27. SIEGEL, A. W., & WHITE, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol 10, pp. 9-55). New York: Academic Press.
28. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
29. THORNDYKE, P. W., & HAYES-ROTH, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560-589.
30. ULLMAN, S., & BASRI, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1005.
31. WANG, R. F., & SIMONS, D. J. (1997). Layout change detection is differentially affected by display rotations and observer movements [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 38, 4695.