Potential of dental adhesives to induce mucosal irritation evaluated by the HET-CAM method

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 275-283

  Dahl, Jon E ^a,b  

^a Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Bonding; Coagulation; In vitro; Monomers

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; ACETONE; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALCOHOL; SOLVENT; WATER; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD VESSEL RUPTURE; CHORIOALLANTOIS; DENTISTRY; MATERIALS TESTING; MUCOSA INFLAMMATION; NONHUMAN; ZYGOTE; ANIMAL; BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; CHEMISTRY; CHICK EMBRYO; DRUG EFFECT; HEMOLYSIS; VASCULARIZATION;

ANIMALS; BLOOD COAGULATION; BLOOD VESSELS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; DENTAL CEMENTS; HEMOLYSIS; HEMORRHAGE;

EID: 38049171120     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350701589286     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
2. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13:44-50.
3. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000;13:25D-30D.
4. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:20S-25S.
5. Kanca J 3rd. Dentin bonding system nomenclature: the next generation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:271-2.
6. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total-etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res 1994;73:629-36.
7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301.
8. Swift EJ Jr. The effect of sealants on dental caries: a review. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:700-4.
9. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Malferrari S. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2006 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 1993;6:283-6.
10. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots. Am J Dent 1999;12:243-9.
11. de Souza Costa CA, do Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM. Response of human pulps following acid conditioning and application of a bonding agent in deep cavities. Dent Mater 2002;18:543-51.
12. Mussel RL, De Sa Silva E, Costa AM, Mandarim-DeLacerda CA. Mast cells in tissue response to dentistry materials: an adhesive resin, a calcium hydroxide and a glass ionomer cement. J Cell Mol Med 2003;7:171-8.
13. de Souza Costa CA, Lopes do Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM, Fontana UF. Response of human pulps capped with a self-etching adhesive system. Dent Mater 2001;17:230-40.
14. Demarco FF, Tarquinio SB, Jaeger MM, de Araujo VC, Matson E. Pulp response and cytotoxicity evaluation of 2 dentin bonding agents. Quintessence Int 2001;32:211-20.
15. Murray PE, Windsor LJ, Hafez AA, Stevenson RG, Cox CF. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites. Oper Dent 2003;28:242-50.
16. Silva GA, Lanza LD, Lopes-Junior N, Moreira A, Alves JB. Direct pulp capping with a dentin bonding system in human teeth: a clinical and histological evaluation. Oper Dent 2006;31:297-307.
17. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Hanks CT. Current status of pulp capping with dentin adhesive systems: a review. Dent Mater 2000;16:188-97.
18. Gwinnett AJ, Tay F. Early and intermediate time response of the dental pulp to an acid etch technique in vivo. Am J Dent 1998;11:S35-44.
19. Huang FM, Chang YC. Cytotoxicity of dentine-bonding agents on human pulp cells in vitro. Int Endod J 2002;35:905-9.
20. Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:474-80.
21. Engelmann J, Volk J, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. ROS formation and glutathione levels in human oral fibroblasts exposed to TEGDMA and camphorquinone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;75:272-6.
22. Volk J, Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W. Effects of three resin monomers on the cellular glutathione concentration of cultured human gingival fibroblasts. Dent Mater 2006;22:499-505.
23. Becher B, Kopperud HM, Al RH, Samuelsen JT, Morisbak E, Dahlman HJ, et al. Pattern of cell death after in vitro exposure to HEMA, TEGDMA, GDMA and two compomer extracts. Dent Mater 2006;22:630-40.
24. Samuelsen JT, Dahl JE, Karlsson SL, Morisbak E, Becher R. Apotosis induced by monomers involves ROS and MAP-kinases. Dent Mater 2007;23:34-9.
25. Dahl JE. Irritation of dental adhesive agents evaluated by HET-CAM test. Toxicol In Vitro 1999;13:259-64.
26. Dahl JE, Frangou-Polyzois MJ, Polyzois GL. In vitro biocompatibility of denture relining materials. Gerodontology 2006;23:17-22.
27. Al RH, Dahl JE, Morisbak E, Polyzois GL. Irritation and cytotoxic potential of denture adhesives. Gerodontology 2005;22:177-83.
28. Lönnroth E-C, Dahl JE, Shahnavaz H. Evaluating the potential occupational hazard of handling dental polymer products using the HET-CAM technique. Int J Occup Safety Ergonomics 1999;5:43-57.
29. Syverud M, Dahl JE, Herø H, Morisbak E. Corrosion and biocompatibility of palladium alloy castings. Dent Mater 2001;17:7-13.
30. Ardlin BI, Dahl JE, Tibballs JE. Static immersion and irritation tests of dental metal-ceramic alloys. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:83-9.
31. Kalweit S, Besoke R, Gerner I, Spielmann H. A national validation project of alternative methods to the Draize rabbit eye test. Toxicol In Vitro 1990;4:702-6.
32. Spielmann H. HET-CAM test. Methods Mol Biol 1995;43:199-204.
33. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
34. Dahl JE, Polyzois GL. Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses. J Prosth Dent 2000;84:453-7.
35. Spielmann H, Liebsch M, Kalweit S, Moldenhauer F, Wirnsberger T, Holzhütter HG, et al. Results of a validation study in Germany on two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, the HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test. ATLA 1996;24:741-858.
36. Mehling A, Kleber M, Hensen H. Comparative studies on the ocular and dermal irritation potential of surfactants. Food Chem Toxicol 2007;45:747-58.
37. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of medical physiology, 11 edn. Hemostasis and blood coagulation. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.
38. Henriks-Eckerman ML, Suuronen K, Jolanki R, Alanko K. Methacrylates in dental restorative materials. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:233-7.
39. Rustemeyer T, Frosch PJ. Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. (I). Clinical picture and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:125-33.
40. Sandberg E, Kahu H, Dahlgren UI. Inflammatogenic and adjuvant properties of HEMA in mice. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:410-6.