Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 243-249

  Ferrari, Marco ^a,b   Cagidiaco, Maria C ^e   Kugel, Gerard ^c   Davidson, Carel L ^d  

^a Research Center for Dentistry   (Italy)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETREATMENT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GINGIVAL RECESSION; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RETREATMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033202033     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kanapka JA, Colucci SV. Clinical evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity. A comparison of methods. Endodont Dent Traumatol 1990; 2: 157-164.
2. Fisher C, Fisher RG, Wennberg A. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent 1992; 20: 272-276.
3. Murray L, Roberts AJ. The prevalence of self-reported hypersensitive teeth. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl.): 129S-135S.
4. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, et al. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 989-992.
5. Addy M, Dowell P. Dentin hypersensitivity. A review: Clinical and in vitro evaluation of treatment agents. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:351-357.
6. Dowell P, Addy M. Dentin hypersensitivity. A review of the etiology, symptoms and theories of pain production. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 341-350.
7. Chesters R, Kaufman HW, Wolff MS, et al. Use of multiple sensitivity measurements and logit statistical analysis to assess the effectiveness of a potassium-citrate-containing dentifrice in reducing dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 256-261.
8. Holland GR. Morphological features of dentine and pulp related to dentine sensitivity. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl):3S-11S.
9. Brännström M. A hydrodynamic mechanism in the transmission of pain producing stimuli through dentine. In: Anderson DJ. Sensory mechanisms in dentine. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1963;73-79.
10. Johnson G, Brännström M. The sensitivity of dentin. Changes in relation to conditions of exposed tubule apertures. Acta Odontol Scand 1974; 32: 29-38.
11. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, et al. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 808-813.
12. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentin hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentin tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentin. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 280-284.
13. Pashley EL, Comer RAW, Simpson MD, et al. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 13-20.
14. Bissada NF. Symptomatology and clinical features of hypersensitive teeth. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl):31S-32S.
15. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:374-380.
16. Hand JS, Hunt RJ, Reinhardt JW. The prevalence and treatment implications of cervical abrasion in the elderly. Gerodontol 1986;2:67-170.
17. Giuliana G, Ammatuna P, Pizzo G, et al. Occurrence of invading bacteria in radicular dentin of periodontally diseased teeth: Microbiological findings. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 478-485.
18. Kleinberg I, Kaufman HW, Wolf M. Measurement of tooth hypersentivity and oral factors involved in its development. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl): 63S-71S.
19. Brännström M, Garberoglio R. Occlusion of tubules under superficially attrited dentine. Swed Dent J 1980; 4, 87-91.
20. Addy M, Mostafa P, Absi EG, et al. Cervical dentine hypersensitivity; Eetiology and management with particular reference to dentifrices. In: Rowe NH. Hypersensitive dentin: Origin and management. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1985;33-64.
21. Trowbridge HO. Review of dental pain histology and physiology. J Endodont 1986; 12: 445-452.
22. Yoshiyama M, Masada A, Uchida A, et al. Scanning electron microscopic characterization of sensitive versus insensitive human radicular dentine. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1498-1502.
23. Narhi M. Dentine hypersensitivity. A review. J Biol Buccale 1985; 13: 75-96.
24. Cox CF. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 293-295.
25. Greenhill JD, Pashley DH. The effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 686-698.
26. Brännström M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KS. Transmission control of dentinal pain: Resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99: 612-618.
27. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, et al. The role of a dentine-bonding agent in reducing cervical dentine sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 286-290.
28. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, et al. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pups of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998; 10: S55-S63.
29. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quint Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
30. Barkmeier WW, Hammesfahr PD, Latta MA. Bond strengths of composite to enamel and dentin using Prime & Bond 2.1. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 136 (Abstr 979).
31. Nathanson D, Ashyeri N. Effect of bonding conditions on single component dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1997; 76:136 (Abstr 977).
32. Ferrari M, Goracci G, García-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three "one-bottle" systems to conditioned and unconditioned vital dental substrates. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 224-230.
33. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, et al. Clinical performance of bonding systems with and without hybrid layers J Dent Res 1997; 76:23 (Abstr 47).
34. Mason PN, Calabrese M, Graif L. Modified extrusion shear bond strength of the new 3M adhesive. J Dent Res 1998;77:1239 (Abstr 256).
35. Kanca, J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996; 6: 273-276.
36. Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, et al. The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater 1981;7:148-150.
37. Hovgaard O, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O. Tooth hypersensitivity in relation to quality of restorations. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 474 (Abstr 1667).
38. Brännström M. Dentine and pulp in restorative dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publ. Ltd, 1982.
39. Kaufman HW, Kleinberg I. Design and statistical aspects of the management of clinical trials to assess antihypersensitivity product efficacy. Archs Oral Biol 1994; 39 (Suppl):97S-100S.