Irritation of dental adhesive agents evaluated by the HET-CAM test

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 259-264

  Dahl, J E ^a  

^a Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Dental adhesive; Dental material; HET CAM; Irritant; Monomer; Mucous membrane

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING; CEMENTATION; CHORIOALLANTOIS; DENTISTRY; LYSIS; MUCOSA INFLAMMATION; NONHUMAN; SCREENING TEST; SKIN IRRITATION;

EID: 0032999608     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2333(98)00086-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Al-Dawood A., Wennberg A. Biocompatibility of dentine bonding agents. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology. 9:1993;1-7.
2. Balls M., Botham P.A., Bruner L.H., Spielmann H. The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro. 9:1995;871-929.
3. Dumsha T.C., Sydiskis R.J. Cytotoxicity testing of a dentine bonding system. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 59:1985;637-641.
4. EC. Commission Directive 96/54/EC of 30 July 1996 adapting to technical progress for the twenty-second time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities. L248:1996;0001-0230.
5. Gettings S.D., Dipasquale L.C., Bagley D.M., Casterton P.L., Chudkowski M., Curren R.D., Demetrulias J.L., Feder P.I., Galli C.L., Gay R., Glaza S.M., Hintze K.L., Janus J., Kurtz P.J., Lordo R.A., Marenus K.D., Moral J., Muscatiello M., Pape W.J.W., Renskers K.J., Roddy M.T., Rozen M.G. The CTFA evaluation of alternatives program: An evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase II) Oil/water emulsions. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 32:1994;943-976.
6. Gettings S.D., Lordo R.A., Demetrulias J., Feder P.I., Hintze K.L. Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. I. Hydroalcoholic formulations. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 34:1996;737-749.
7. Kalweit S., Besoke R., Gerner I., Spielmann H. A national validation project of alternative methods to the Draize rabbit eye test. Toxicology in Vitro. 4:1990;702-706.
8. Meryon S.D., Brook A.M. In vitro cytotoxicity of three dentine bonding agents. Journal of Dentistry. 17:1989;279-283.
9. Neroni M., Regad C., Christen O., Thoenen S., Holz J. Six produits adhesifs dentinaires soumis au controle in vitro. Journal de Biologie Buccale. 18:1990;271-285.
10. Ratanasathien S., Wataha J.C., Hanks C.T., Dennison J.B. Cytotoxic interactive effects of dentine bonding components on mouse fibroblasts. Journal of Dental Research. 74:1995;1602-1606.
11. Redlich M., Harary D., Shoshan S. Gingival response to a new multipurpose dental adhesive: A histologic study in dogs. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 76:1996;379-385.
12. Rougier A., Cottin M., de Silva O., Roguet R., Catroux P., Toufic A., Dossou K-G. In vitro methods: Their relevance and complementarity in ocular safety assessment. Lens and Eye Toxicity Research. 9:1992;229-245.
13. Ruyter I.E. The chemistry of adhesive agents. Operative Dentistry. 17:(Suppl. 5):1992;32-43.
14. Schendel K.U., Erdinger L., Komposch G., Sonntag H-G. Untersuchung kieferorthopädischer Materialien im HET-CAM-Test auf schleimhautreizende Wirkung. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 55:1994;28-35.
15. Schendel K.U., Erdinger L., Komposch G., Sonntag H-G. Neonfarbene Kunststoffe für kieferorthopädische Apparaturen. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 56:1995;41-48.
16. Spielmann H. (1995) HET-CAM test. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 43: Toxicity Testing Protocols. Edited by S. O'Hara and C. K. Atterwill, pp. 199-204. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
17. Spielmann H., Kalweit S., Liebsch M., Wirnsberger T., Gerner I., Bertram-Neis E., Krauser K., Kreiling R., Miltenburger H.G., Pape W., Steiling W. Validation study of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany; Cytotoxicity testing and HET-CAM test with 136 industrial chemicals. Toxicology in Vitro. 7:1993;505-510.
18. Spielmann H., Liebsch M., Kalweit S., Moldenhauer F., Wirnsberger T., Holzhütter H.-G., Schneider B., Glaser S., Gerner I., Pape W.J.W., Kreiling R., Krauser K., Miltenburger H.G., Steiling W., Luepke N.P., Müller N., Kreuzer H., Mürmann P., Spengler J., Bertram-Neis E., Siegemund B., Wiebel F.J. Results of a validation study in Germany on two in vitro alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test, the HET-CAM test and the 3T3 NRU cytotoxicity test. ATLA. 24:1996;741-858.