Comparative studies on the ocular and dermal irritation potential of surfactants

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 747-758

  Mehling, A ^a   Kleber, M ^a   Hensen, H ^a  

^a Department of Intellectual Capital   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alternative methods; Dermal; Irritation; Ocular; Surfactant(s)

Indexed keywords

SURFACTANT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHORIOALLANTOIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGG; ERYTHROCYTE; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TEST;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; CHICKENS; CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; ERYTHROCYTES; EYE; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; SKIN; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 33947501678     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.10.024     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ananthapadmanabhan K.P., Moore D.J., Subramanyan K., Misra M., and Meyer F. Cleansing without compromise: the impact of cleansers on the skin barrier and the technology of mild cleansing. Dermatol Ther. 17 Suppl. 1 (2004) 16-25
2. Aulmann W., and Sterzel W. Toxicology of alkyl polyglucosides. In: Hill K.H., von Rybinski W., and Stoll G. (Eds). Alkyl Polyglucosides (1997), VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim 152-176
3. Baranda L., Gonzalez-Amaro R., Torres-Alvarez B., Alvarez C., and Ramirez V. Correlation between pH and irritant effect of cleansers marketed for dry skin. Int. J. Dermatol. 41 (2002) 494-499
4. Bartnik F., and Künstler K. Biological effects, toxicology and human safety. In: Falbe J. (Ed). Surfactants in Consumer Products (1987), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 475-503 Chapter 9
5. Basketter D.A., Griffiths H.A., Wang X.M., Wilhelm K.P., and McFadden J. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 35 (1996) 208-213
6. Basketter D.A., Marriott M., Gilmour N.J., and White I.R. Strong irritants masquerading as skin allergens: the case of benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis. 50 (2004) 213-217
7. Brasch J., Becker D., and Effendy I. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Contact Dermatitis 41 (1999) 150-155
8. Cooper E.R., and Berner B. Interaction of surfactants with epidermal tissues: physicochemical aspects. In: Rieger M. (Ed). Surfactants in Cosmetics (1985), Marcel Dekker Inc., NY 195-210
9. Deo N., Jockusch S., Turro N., and Somasundaran P. Surfactant interactions with zein protein. Langmuir. 19 (2003) 5083-5088
10. Dihoum M., Mahmoud G.S., and Sudani O. An outbreak of hand-dermatitis among workers using sodium lauryl sulfate for skin cleansing. Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 366-367
11. Dykes P. Surfactants and skin. Int J Cosmet Sci. 20 (1998) 53-61
12. Ehlers C., Ivens U.I., Moller M.L., Senderovitz T., and Serup J. Females have lower skin surface pH than men. A study on the surface of gender, forearm site variation, right/left difference and time of the day on the skin surface pH. Skin Res. Technol. 7 (2001) 90-94
13. Forster T., Issberner I., and Hensen H. Lipid/sufactant compounds as a new tool to optimize skin-care properties of personal-cleansing products. J. Surfactants Deterg. 3 (2000) 345-352
14. Frosch P.J., and Kligman A.M. The soap chamber test. A new method to assess the irritancy of soaps. J. Am. Acad. Dermat. 1 (1979) 35-41
15. INVITTOX protocols: http://www.ib.amwaw.edu.pl/invittox/.
16. Loffler H., Becker D., Brasch J., Geier J., and The German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulfate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Br. J. Dermatol. 152 (2005) 709-719
17. Loffler H., Effendy I., and Happle R. Die irritative Kontaktdermatitis. Hautarzt 51 (2000) 203-215
18. Loffler H., and Happle R. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside. Contact Dermatitis 48 (2003) 26-32
19. Loffler H., and Happle R. Influence on climatic conditions on the irritant patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate. Acta Derm. Vernereol. 83 (2003) 338-341
20. Matousek J.L., and Campbell K.L. A comparative review of cutaneous pH. Vet. Dermatol. 13 (2002) 293-300
21. Mehling A., and Fluhr J. Chronobiology: clocks and rhythms of the skin. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 19 (2006) 182-189
22. Pape W.J., and Hoppe U. Standardization of an in vitro red blood cell test for evaluating the acute cytotoxic potential of tensides. Arzneim-Forschung/Drug Res. 40 (1990) 498-502
23. Pape W.J., Pfannenbecker U., Argembeaux H., Bracher M., Esdaile D.J., Hagino S., Kasai Y., and Lewis R.W. COLIPA validation project on in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients and finished products (phase I): the red blood cell test for the estimation of acute eye irritation potentials. Present status. Toxicol. In vitro 13 (1999) 343-354
24. Pfannenbecker, U., Ennen, J., Wenck H., Diembeck, W., 2005. Screening skin irritation potential of surfactants with the red blood cell test. Comparison to EpiDerm skin model and human patch test data. Poster 121. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Berlin.
25. Rhein L.D., Simion F.A., Hill R.L., Cagan R.H., Mattai J., and Maibach H.I. Human cutaneous response to a mixed surfactant system: role of solution phenomena in controlling surfactant irritation. Dermatologica 180 (1990) 18-23
26. Robinson M.K. Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses. Contact Dermatitis 45 (2001) 75-83
27. Robinson M.K. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 86-93
28. Steiling W., Bracher M., Courtelemont P., and de Silva O. The HET-CAM, a useful in vitro assay for assessing the eye irritation properties of cosmetic formulations and ingredients. Toxicol In vitro 13 (1999) 375-384
29. Turkoglu M., and Pekmezci E. Evaluation of irritation potential of surfactant mixtures. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 21 (1999) 371-382
30. Walker A.P., Basketter D.A., Baverel M., Diembeck W., Matthies W., Mougin D., Paye M., Rothlisberger R., and Dupuis J. Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food Chem. Toxicol. 24 (1996) 651-660
31. Williams S., Davids M., Reuther T., Kraus D., and Kerscher M. Gender difference of in vivo skin surface pH in the axilla and the effect of a standardized washing procedure with tap water. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 18 (2005) 247-252
32. Xu K.P., Li X.F., and Yu F.S. Corneal organ culture model for assessing epithelial responses to surfactants. Toxicol. Sci. 58 (2000) 306-314
33. Yosipovitch G., Xiong G.L., Haus E., Sackett-Lundeen L., Ashkenazi I., and Maibach H.I. Time-dependent variations of the skin barrier function in humans: transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, and skin temperature. J. Invest. Dermatol. 110 (1998) 20-33