Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 242-250

  Murray, P E ^a,e   Windsor, L J ^b   Hafez, A A ^c   Stevenson, R G ^d   Cox, C F ^d  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; RESIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; NONHUMAN; ODONTOBLAST; PRIMATE; PULPITIS; STAINING; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PULP;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; MACACA MULATTA; METHACRYLATES; ODONTOBLASTS; PULPITIS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0141893305     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. About I, Murray PE, Franquin J-C, Remusat M & Smith AJ (2001) Pulpal inflammatory responses following non-carious Class V restorations Operative Dentistry 26(4) 336-342.
2. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, Suzuki S, Otsuki M, Suzuki S & Cox CF (1998) Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on non-exposed and exposed primate teeth Quintessence International 29(3) 177-188.
3. Arnst C & Carey J (1998) Biotech bodies Business Week July 42-49.
4. Barthel CR, Rosenkranz B, Leuenberg A & Roulet JF (2000) Pulp capping of carious exposures: Treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: A retrospective study Journal of Endodontics 26(9) 525-528.
5. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ & Syed SA (1982) Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp Journal of Oral Pathology 11(6) 439-450.
6. Bergenholtz G (1990) Pathogenic mechanisms in pulpal disease Journal of Endodontics 16(2) 98-101.
7. Bergenholtz G (2000) Evidence for bacterial causation of adverse pulpal responses in resin-based dental restorations Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine 11(4) 467-480.
8. Berry TG, Summit JB, Chung AK & Osborne JW (1998) Amalgam at the new millennium Journal of the American Dental Association 129(11) 1547-1556.
9. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA & Wilson NH (1999) Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices Primary Dental Care 6(1) 17-20.
10. Christensen GJ (2000) The need for caries-preventive restorative materials Journal of the American Dental Association 131(9) 1347-1349.
11. Clinical Research Associates Newsletter (1995) Use survey 19 4.
12. Costa CA, Mesas AN & Hebling J (2000) Pulp response to direct pulp capping with an adhesive American Journal of Dentistry 13(2) 81-87.
13. Cox CF, Heys DR & Heys RJ (1977) A gravity perfusion technique for lab animals Laboratory Animal 6(4) 18-22.
14. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E & Bergenholtz G (1987) Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 57(1) 1-8.
15. Cox CF, White KC, Ramus DL, Farmer JB & Snuggs HM (1992) Reparative dentin: Factors affecting its deposition Quintessence International 23(4) 257-270.
16. Cox CF (1994) Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage American Journal of Dentistry 7(5) 293-295.
17. Cox CF & Suzuki S (1994) Re-evaluating pulp protection: Calcium hydroxide liners vs cohesive hybridization Journal of the American Dental Association 125(7) 823-831.
18. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki N, Suzuki S & Tarim B (1998) Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth American Journal of Dentistry 11(Special Issue) S55-S63.
19. nd ed Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, p 210-231.
20. de Souza Costa CA, Lopes DO, Nascimento AB, Teixeira HM & Fontana UF (2001) Response of human pulps capped with a self-etching adhesive system Dental Materials 17(3) 230-240.
21. Duke ES (1993) Adhesion and its application with restorative materials Dental Clinics of North America 37(3) 329-340.
22. Fukushi Y & Fusayama T (1980) Effect of cyanoacrylate treatment of cavity walls Journal of Dental Research 59(4) 662-669.
23. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N & Iwaku M (1979) Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin Journal of Dental Research 58(4) 1364-1370.
24. Hebling J, Giro EMA & Costa CAS (1999) Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities Journal of Dentistry 27(8) 557-564.
25. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H & Van Meerbeek B (2001) Microtensile bond strength of 11 contemporary adhesives to dentin Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(3) 237-245.
26. ISO 7405 (1997) Pre-clinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry: Test methods for dental materials Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
27. Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N & Ebisu S (2001) Bactericidal-effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 28(4) 314-319.
28. Kugel G & Ferrari, M (2000) The science of bonding: From first- to sixth-generation Journal of the American Dental Association 131(Supplement) 20S-25S.
29. Kitasako Y, Inokoshi S & Tagami J (1999) Effects of direct pulp capping techniques on short term response of the mechanically exposed pulps Journal of Dentistry 27(4) 257-263.
30. Lutz FU, Krejci I & Besek M (1997) Operative dentistry: The missing clinical standards Practical Periodontal Aesthetic Dentistry 9(5) 541-548.
31. Maupome G & Sheiham A (1998) Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 25(12) 896-901.
32. McKay GS (1970) Gram stain modified to improve color contrast Journal of Clinical Pathology 23(2) 191.
33. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA & Adair SM (1998) Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: Results at year 10 Journal of the American Dental Association 129(1) 55-66.
34. Mjör IA (1983) Biological and clinical properties in Mjör IA, editor, Dental Materials, Biological Properties and Clinical Evaluation, Boca Raton; CRC Press Boca Raton, FL 91-121.
35. Mjör IA, Jokstad A & Qvist V (1990) Longevity of posterior restorations International Dental Journal 40(1) 11-17.
36. Mjör IA & Ferrari M (2002) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques Quintessence International 33(1) 35-63.
37. Mjör IA (2002) Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry Quintessence Publishing, London.
38. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith G, Franquin J-C & Smith AJ (2000) Post operative pulpal and repair responses Journal of the American Dental Association 131(3) 321-329.
39. Murray PE, About I, Franquin J-C Remusat M & Smith AJ (2001) Restorative pulpal and repair responses Journal of the American Dental Association 132(4) 482-491.
40. Murray PE, Smyth TW, About I, Remusat R, Franquin J-C & Smith AJ (2002a) The effect of etching on bacterial microleakage of an adhesive composite restoration Journal of Dentistry 30(1) 29-36.
41. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ & Cox CF (2002b) Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials Dental Materials 18(6) 470-478.
42. Pameijer CH & Stanley HR (1998) The disastrous effects of the "Total Etch" technique in vital pulp capping in primates American Journal of Dentistry 11(Special Issue) S45-S59.
43. Pereira JC, Segala AD & Souza Costa CA (2000) Human pulpal response to direct pulp capping with an adhesive system American Journal of Dentistry 13(3) 139-147.
44. Pilo R & Ben-Amar A (1999) Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 82(2) 209-213.
45. Ranly DM & García-Godoy F (2000) Current and potential pulp therapies for primary and young permanent teeth Journal of Dentistry 28(3) 153-161.
46. Ricketts D (2001) Management of the deep carious lesion and the vital pulp dentine complex British Dental Journal 191(11) 606-610.
47. Schuurs AH, Gruythuysen RJ & Wesselink PR (2000) Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs calcium hydroxide: A review Endodontics & Dental Traumatology 16(6) 240-250.
48. Shavell HM (1980) The amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations Journal of the California Dental Association 8(4) 48-55.
49. Stanley HR (1968) Design for a human pulp study I Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 25(4) 633-647.
50. Swerdlow H & Stanley HR (1958) Reaction of the human dental pulp to cavity preparation I Effect of water spray at 20,000 rpm Journal of the American Dental Association 56(3) 317-329.
51. Tarim B, Hafez AA, Suzuki SH, Suzuki S & Cox CF (1998) Biocompatibility of Optibond and XR-Bond adhesive systems in non-human primate teeth International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 18(1) 86-99.
52. Vann WF Jr, Barkmeier WW & Mahler DB (1988) Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: Four-year findings Journal of Dental Research 67(5) 876-879.
53. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1998) The clinical performance of adhesives Journal of Dentistry 26(1) 1-20.
54. nd edition.
55. Warfvinge J (1987) Morphometric analysis of teeth with inflamed pulp Journal of Dental Research 66(1) 78-83.
56. Watts A & Paterson RC (1987) Bacterial contamination as a factor influencing the toxicity of materials to the exposed dental pulp Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 64(4) 466-474.
57. Zöllner A & Gaengler P (2000) Pulp reactions to different preparation techniques on teeth exhibiting periodontal disease Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 27(2) 93-102.