Knowledge-system theory in society: Charting the growth of knowledge-system models over a decade, 1994-2003

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 2372-2381

  Graham, Paul J ^a   Dickinson, Harley D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDICINE;

HEALTH KNOWLEDGE USE; HEALTH SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE MODELS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 38049160880     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20730     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Birdsall, W.F., Shearer, K., Babe, R.E., deBruijn, D.I., Holmes, J.D., MacDonald, B.H., McCormick, P., Schmidt, B., & Wood, G. (2005). Towards an integrated knowledge ecosystem: A Canadian research strategy. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL).
2. Böhme, G. (1997). The structures and prospects of knowledge society, Social Science Information, 36(3), 447-468.
3. Calnan, M., & Ferlie, E. (2003). Analysing process in healthcare: The methodological and theoretical challenges. Policy & Politics, 31(2). 185-193.
4. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2004). Innovation in the knowledge economy: Implications for education and learning. Paris: OECD.
5. Crump, N. (2002). Managing professional integration in an acute hospital-a sociopoliticial analysis. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(2): 107-118.
6. Danell, R., & Persson, O. (2003). Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 58(2), 203-218.
7. Dick, A.L. (1982). Society's knowledge system and its implications for librarianship. South African Journal for Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 17-21.
8. Dickinson, H.D. (2003). The transfer and utilization of social scientific knowledge for policy-making: Perspectives in sociology. In F. Champagne & L. Lemieux-Charles (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on evidencebased decision-making in health care (pp. 41-69). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9. Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics, New York: Hawthorne Press.
10. Estabrooks, C.A. (1999). The conceptual structure of research utilization. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(3). 203-216.
11. Estabrooks, C.A., Winther, C., & Derksen, L. (2004). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. Nursing Research, 53(5), 293-303.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18-29.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. New York: Routledge.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation; The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1999). Whose Triple Helix? Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 138-139.
16. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
17. Feather, J. (1998). The information society: A study of continuity and change (2nd ed.). London: Library Association Publishing.
18. Feinstein, A. (2002). Will clinicians' challenges be solved by another theoretical model? Commentary on Sweeney & Kernick (2002), Clinical evaluation: Constructing a new model for post-normal medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 8(2), 139-141.
19. Fenton, E., Harvey, J., Griffiths, F., Wild, A., & Sturt, J. (2001 ). Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. Family Practice, 18(5), 540-544.
20. Ferlie, E., & Wood, M. (2003). Novel mode of knowledge production? Producers and consumers in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8(Suppl, 2 to Issue 4), 51-57.
21. Frederiksen, L.F., Hannson, F., & Wenneberg, S.B. (2003). The agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation, 9(2), 149-172.
22. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1985). Three types of risk assessment. In CG. Whipple &. V. T. Covello (Eds.), Risk analysis in the private sector (pp. 123-139). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Funtowicz, S., &. Ravetz, J. (1990). A new problem-solving strategy for global environmental issues. National Forum, 70(4), 38-42.
24. Funtowicz., S.,& Ravetz, J. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp. 137-152). New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1992a). Risk management as a Post-Normal Science. Risk Analysis, 12(1), 95-97.
26. Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1992b). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of Post-Normal Science. In S. Krimsky, & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251-273). Westport, CT: Praeger.
27. Funtowicz, S., &. Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739-55.
28. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Goktepe, D. (2003). The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli magnet program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey. Scientometrics, 58(2), 219-239.
30. Gray, J.A.M. (2002). Evidence-based policy making (2nd ed). In A. Haines & A. Donald (Eds.), Getting research findings into practice (pp. 154-161). London: BMJ Books.
31. Hanney, S.R., Gonzalez-Block, M.A., Buxton, MJ., & Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment: Review of social aspects. Health Research Policy and Systems, 1, Article 2. Retrieved January, 2004, from http://www.health-policy- systems.com/content/1/1/2
32. Holzner, B., & Marx, J.H. (1979). Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33. Juma, C., Fang, K., Honca, D., Huete-Perez, J., Konde, V., Lee, S., Arenas, J., Ivinson, A., Robinson, H., & Singh, S. (2001). Global governance of technology: meeting the needs of developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7-8): 629-655
34. Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Indicators of innovation in a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics, 5(1), Paper 2. Retrieved June, 2003, from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v5i1p2.html
36. Leydesdorff, L., & Curran, M. (2000). Mapping university-industry- govemment relations on the internet: The construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics 4(1), Paper 2. Retrieved June, 2003, from http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v4i1p2.html
37. Lievrouw, L.A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16(5), 615-628.
38. Lomas, J. (1997). Research and evidence-based decision making. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 21(5), 439-441.
39. Machlup, E (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Meyer, M. (2002). Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics, 54(2), 193-212.
41. Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., & Utecht, J. (2003). Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
42. Morris, N. (2000). Vial bodies: Conflicting interests in the move to new institutional relationships in biological medicines research and regulation. Research Policy, 29(2), 149-167.
43. Morris, N. (2001). The changing landscape of regulatory control of biological medicines. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(2), 247-263.
44. Neelameghan, A. (1999). Information economy and knowledge society: An introduction. Information Studies, 5(2), 107-124.
45. Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. Paris: OECD.
46. Pang, T., Sadana, R., Hanney, S., Bhutta, Z.A., Hyder, A.A., & Simon, J. (2003). Knowledge for better health: A conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(11), 815-820.
47. Priego, J.L.O. (2003). A vector space model as a methodological approach to the Triple Helix dimensionality: A comparative study of biology and biomedicine centres of two European national research councils from a webometric view. Scientometrics, 58(2), 429-443.
48. Ravetz, J. (2002). Food safety, quality, and ethics: A post-normal perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15(3), 255-265.
49. Ravetz, J. (2004). The Post-Normal Science of precaution. Futures, 36(3), 347-357.
50. Rich, R.F. (1981). Knowledge in society. In R.F. Robert (Ed.), The knowledge cycle (pp. 11-39). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
51. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg W., Gray J.A., Haynes, R.B., & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72.
52. Salter, L., Levy, E., & Leiss, W. (1988). Mandated science: Science and scientists in the making of standards. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
53. Shinn, T. (2002). The Triple Helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 34(4), 599-614.
54. Sohng, S.L. (1996), Participatory research and community organizing. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 23(4), 77-97.
55. Sweeney, K., & Kernick, D. (2002). Clinical evaluation: Constructing a new model for post-normal medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 8(2), 131-138.
56. Thelwall, M., Harries, G., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Why do Web sites from different academic subjects interlink? Journal of Information Science, 29(6), 453-471.
57. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., Cothey, V., Li, X., & Smith, A.G. (2003). Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process. Online Information Review, 27(5), 333-343.
58. Tuzi, F. (2005). Useful science is good science: Empirical evidence from the Italian national research council. Technovation, 25(5), 505-512.
59. Van Manen, M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity and the new production of knowledge. Qualitative Health Research, 11(6), 850-852.
60. Verbeek, A., Bebackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179-211.
61. Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2003). Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research. Scientometrics, 58(1), 91-114.
62. Waltner-Toews, D. (2000). The end of medicine: The beginning of health. Futures, 32(7), 655-667.
63. Weiss, C.H. (1977a). Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531-547.
64. Weiss, C.H. (1977b). Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
65. World Health Organization (WHO). (2004). World report on knowledge for better health. Retrieved 2004 http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/wr2004/en/
66. Wilts, A. (2000). Forms of research organization and their responsiveness to external goal setting. Research Policy, 29(6), 767-781.
67. World Bank. (2005). Knowledge assessment methodology. Retrieved 2005 from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/kam2005/
68. Wouters, P. (1997). Citation cycles and peer review cycles. Scientometrics, 38(1), 39-55.
69. Ziman, J., (2003). Noninstrumental roles of science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(1), 17-27.