The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey

Scientometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 219-239

  Goktepe, Devrim ^a,b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243139423     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026280409195     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AMIDON, M. D. (1996), Decade of perspective: A vision for the technology transfer profession, Technology Transfer Journal of the Technology Transfer Society, 21 (1/2): 5-8.
2. BERRY, O. (1998), available at http://magnet.consortia.org.il/Magnet/ English/11.html
3. BOZKURT, V., S. AYTAC (1998), University industry partnership in Turkey (1998), Iktisat Dergisi Uludag University, 16 (4): 25-32.
4. DAVID, P. A., D. FORAY, W. E. STEINMUELLER (1999), The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behavior, 1997. In: A. GAMBARDELLA, F. MALERBA (Eds) The Organization of Innovative Activities in Europe, Cambridge University Press.
5. DAVIS, C. H., F. CARDEN (1999), Research Effectiveness and R&D Evaluation in Developing Countries, available at http://business.unbsj.ca/users/ cdavis/papers/Evaluat2.html
6. DE CASTRO, E. A., C. RODRIGUES, C. ESTEVES, A. DA ROSA PIRES (2000), The Triple Helix Model a motor for the creative use of telematics. Research Policy, 29 (2): 193-203.
7. DEBRESSON, C., F. AMESSE (1991), Networks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issue, Research Policy, Special Edition, pp. 363-379.
8. DODGSON, M., R. ROTWELL (1994), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
9. DODGSON, M. (2001), Strategic research partnerships: Their role and some issues in measuring their extent and outcomes, Proceedings from NSF Workshop, Arlington, VA.
10. ENOSH (2001), Private Consulting Firm Report on the Magnet Program, (originally, in Hebrew some parts are translated to English by the author)
11. ETZKOWITZ, H., A. WEBSTER, C. GEBHARDT, B. R. C. TERRA, (2000), The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm, Research Policy, 29: 313-330.
12. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (1997), Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 24 (1): 2-5.
13. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (1997), Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix of University Industry Government Relations, Cassell Academic, London.
14. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (1998), The endless transition: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Minerva, 36: 203-208.
15. ETZKOWITZ, H., L. LEYDESDORFF (2000),The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and Mode 2 to Triple Helix of university industry government relations, Research Policy, 29: 109-123.
16. EU MNC Report (1997), available at http://www.jrc.es/projects/euromed/ SEMP/SEMP.html
17. EU Trend Chart on Innovation, Country Reports on Israel, July 2000-December 2000
18. FRENKEL, A., S. ROPER (2000), Different Paths to Success: The Growth of Electronics Sector in Ireland & Israel, SNI Publications.
19. FUJIGAKI, Y., L. LEYDESDORFF (2000), Quality control and validation boundaries in a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations: Mode 2 and the future of university research, Social Science Information, 39 (4): 635-655.
20. GIBSON, D. V., E. M. ROGERS (1994), R&D Collaboration on Trial, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. pp. 21-22.
21. GILBERT, N., P. AHRWEILER, A. PYKA, R. E. I. GLEN (1999), Innovation Networks: A Policy Model, SEIN Project paper #8.
22. GUSTON, D. H., K. KENISTON (1994), Introduction: The social contract for science. In: GUSTON, D. H., KENISTON, K. (Eds), The Fragile Contract, MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 1-41.
23. HAME L, G., Y. DOZ, C. K. PRAHALAD (1989), Collaborate with your competitors and win, Harvard Business Review, 1: 133-139.
24. Harvard University Gazette (1998), available at http://www.news.harvard. edu/gazette/1998/05.21/FromGundHalltol.html
25. IEBI (1999), available at http://www.export.gov.il/export/doa_iis.dll/ Serve/item/English/1.2.6.1.5. No. 4.
26. ISTE TURKIYE (2000), available at http://www.byegm.gov.tr/Turkiye/ english/educate380.htm
27. JACOB, M., T. HELLSTROM, N. ADLER, F. NORRGREN (2000), From sponsorship to partnership in academy-industry relations, R&D Management, 30 (3): 255-262.
28. KAUKONEN, E., M. NIEMINEN (1998), The future of Triple Helices: Mobile or vanishing boundaries, Triple Helix Conference II, New York.
29. KIM, J. (1999), Network building between Research Institutions and Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Dynamics of Innovation Network Building and Implications for a Policy Option, Korea Institute of Public Administration Publications.
30. KLINE, L., N. ROSENBERG, N. (2000), An overview of innovation, In: R. LAUDAU, N. Rosenberg (Eds), The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington: National Academy Press.
31. KOSCHATZKY, K., M. KULICKE (1994), Policies towards technology-based companies in a regional context, In: K. GONDA, F. SAKAUCHI, T. HIGGINS (Eds), Regionalization of Science and Technology Resources in the context of Globalization.
32. LEVY, J. D., R. J. SAMUELS (1991), Research collaboration as technology strategy, In: Mytelka, L. K. (Ed.), Strategic Partnerships, Pinter Publishers, London, pp.120-148.
33. LEYDESDORFF, L., H. ETZKOWITZ (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23 (5): 279-286.
34. LUNDVALL, B. A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter Publishers, London.
35. MAGNET PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT (1998), MOIT Publications Israel.
36. MANI, S. (2002), Government, Innovation and Technology Policy (2000) in International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
37. METCALFE, S. (1990), On diffusion, investment, and the process of technological change, In: E. DEIACO, E. HORNELL, G. VICKERY (Eds), Technology and Investment: Critical Issues for the 1990s. Pinter Publishers, London.
38. METCALFE, S. (1995), The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives, In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, P. STONEMAN (Ed.), Basil Blackwell, USA, pp. 409-512.
39. National Expenditure on Civilian R&D 1989-2000, Central Bureau of Statistics Publication No: 1167, Israel.
40. NELSON, R. R. (1996), Sources of Economic Growth, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. NORDFORS, D., B. BERGER (2000), Technology Transfer Between Industry, Academia and Defense in Israel, Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences.
42. OECD (1999), Managing National Innovation Systems, Paris.
43. PAVITT, K. (1997), Academic research, technical change and government policy, In: J. KRIGE, D. PESTRE (Eds), Science in the Twentieth Century, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 143-158.
44. PORTER, E. M. (1998), Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, Article.
45. Report on Pre-Competitive Research, (1994), TUBITAK Publications, available at http://www.mam.gov.tr/enstituler/mktae/eop.html
46. RULLANI, E., A. ZANFEI (1988), Networks between manufacturing and demand: Cases from textile and clothing industries, In: C. ANTONELLI (Ed.), New Information Technology and Industrial Change, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
47. SINHA, D. K., M. CUSUMANO (1991), Complementary resources and cooperative research: A model of research joint ventures among competitors, Management Science, 37: 1091-1106.
48. SKYRME, D. (1994), Innovation Through Knowledge Networks, Management Insight, No. 12.
49. STEINMUELLER, W. E. (1994), Basic research and industrial innovation, 1994, In: M. DODGSON, R. ROTHWELL (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Chapter 5, pp. 54-56.
50. TEUBAL, M. (1993), The national innovation system of Israel: Issues, problems and challenges, In: R. NELSON (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. TILLES, J. (1987), Israeli Economic Performance, Jerusalem Institute of Management, Telesis, Jerusalem.
52. TRAJTENBERG, M. (1999), Innovation in Israel: A Comparative Study Using Patent Data, NBER Working Paper Series, Cambridge, MA.
53. TRAJTENBERG, M. (2000), R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment, SNI Working Papers Series.
54. TUGCU, K. (2000), available at http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/Haberler/ Kemal%20TUGCU.html
55. UZUMCU, A. (2000), available at http://www.turkishembassy-telaviv.org/ Current Issues/turkish-israeli relations.
56. VON HIPPLE, E. (1987), Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading, Research Policy, 16 (6): 291-302.