Evidence-Based Policy Making

Getting Research Findings into Practice: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 154-161

  Gray, J A Muir ^a  

^a UK National Screening Committee   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community benefit; Policy making; Pressure; Solidarity; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948958121     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470755891.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Tanenbaum SJ. "Medical effectiveness" in Canadian and US health policy: the comparative politics of inferential ambiguity. Health Serv Res 1996;31:5, 517-32.
2. National Cancer Institute. National Institutes of Health consensus statement: Breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49. Bethesda, MD: NIH, 1997.
3. Marwick C. NIH consensus panel spurs discontent. JAMA 1997;277:519-20.
4. Fletcher SW. Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1180-3.
5. Fletcher J, Hicks NR, Kay JDS, Body PA. Using decision analysis to compare policies for antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. BMJ 1996;311:351-6.
6. Mill JS. On Liberty. Fontana Library, 1969.
7. Angell M. Science on Trial. New York:WW Norton & Co. Inc., 1996.
8. Halberstam D. The best and the brightest. Random House, 1986.