Cooperative symmetric to asymmetric conformational transition of the apo-form of scavenger decapping enzyme revealed by simulations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 498-508

  Pentikäinen, Ulla ^a,b   Pentikäinen, Olli T ^a,b   Mulholland, Adrian J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cooperative conformational change; Dimeric enzyme; Hinge bending motion; Molecular dynamics simulation; Swapped domain structure

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DCPS PROTEIN; DIMER; ENZYME; MESSENGER RNA; SCAVENGER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RNA DEGRADATION; RNA SPLICING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

CATALYSIS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DIMERIZATION; ENDORIBONUCLEASES; HUMANS; HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 37849017099     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21540     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Caponigro G, Parker R. Mechanisms and control of mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev 1996;60:233-249.
2. Mitchell P, Tollervey D. 5′-Terminal cap structure in eukaryotic messenger ribonucleic-acids. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001;13:320-325.
3. Wilusz CJ, Wormington M, Peltz SW. The cap-to-tail guide to mRNA turnover. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:237-246.
4. Banerjee AK. 5′-terminal cap structure in eucaryotic messenger ribonucleic acids. Microbiol Rev 1980;44:175-205.
5. Lewis JD, Gunderson SI, Mattaj IW. The influence of 5′ and 3′ end structures on pre-mRNA metabolism. J Cell Sci Suppl 1995;19:13-19.
6. van Hoof A, Parker R. Mammalian mRNA degradation: beginning at the end. Curr Biol 2002;12:R285-R287.
7. Parker R, Song H. The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:121-127.
8. Liu HD, Rodgers ND, Jiao X, Kiledjian M. The scavenger mRNA decapping enzyme DcpS is a member of the HIT family of pyrophosphatases. EMBO J 2002;21:4699-4708.
9. Rodgers ND, Wang Z, Kiledjian M. Regulated alpha-globin mRNA decay is a cytoplasmic event proceeding through 3′-to-5′ exosome-dependent decapping. RNA 2002;8:1526-1537.
10. Wang Z, Kiledjian M. Functional link between the mammalian exosome and mRNA decapping. Cell 2001;107:751-762.
11. Liu SW, Jiao XF, Liu HD, Gu MG, Lima CD, Kiledjian M. Functional analysis of mRNA scavenger decapping enzymes. RNA 2004;10:1412-1422.
12. van Dijk E, Le Hir H, Seraphin B. DcpS can act in the 5′-3′ mRNA decay pathway in addition to the 3′-5′ pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:12081-12086.
13. Chen N, Walsh MA, Liu YY, Parker R, Song HW. Crystal structures of human DcpS in ligand-free and m7GDP-bound forms suggest a dynamic mechanism for scavenger mRNA decapping. J Mol Biol 2005;347:707-718.
14. Gu MG, Fabrega C, Liu SW, Liu HD, Kiledjian M, Lima CD. Insights into the structure, mechanism, and regulation of scavenger mRNA decapping activity. Mol Cell 2004;14:67-80.
15. Huber R, Bennett WS Jr. Functional significance of flexibility in proteins. Biopolymers 1983;22:261-279.
16. Karplus M, Kuriyan J. Chemical theory and computation special feature: molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:6679-6685.
17. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 2002;9:646-652.
18. Karplus M, McCammon JA. Dynamics of proteins:. elements and function. Annu Rev Biochem 1983;53:263-300.
19. Lodola A, Mor M, Zurek J, Tarzia G, Piomelli D, Harvey JN, Mulholland AJ. Conformational effects in enzyme catalysis: reaction via a high energy conformation in fatty acid amide hydrolase. Biophys J 2007;92:L20-L22.
20. Masgrau L, Roujeinikova A, Johannissen LO, Hothi P, Basran J, Ranaghan KE, Mulholland AJ, Sutcliffe MJ, Scrutton NS, Leys D. Atomic description of an enzyme reaction dominated by proton tunneling. Science 2006;312:237-241.
21. Pentikäinen U, Settimo L, Johnson MS, Pentikäinen OT. Subtype selectivity and flexibility of ionotropic glutamate receptors upon ligand binding. Org Biomol Chem 2006;4:1058-1070.
22. Strickland N, Mulholland AJ, Harvey JN. The Fe-CO bond energy in myoglobin: a QM/MM study of the effect of tertiary structure. Biophys J 2006;90:L27-L29.
23. Warshel A. Molecular dynamics simulations of biological reactions. Acc Chem Res 2002;35:385-395.
24. Yon JM, Perahia D, Ghelis C. Conformational dynamics and enzyme activity. Biochimie 1998;80:33-42.
25. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
26. Lehtonen JV, Still DJ, Rantanen VV, Ekholm J, Björklund D, Iftikhar Z, Huhtala M, Repo S, Jussila A, Jaakkola J, Pentikäinen O, Nyrönen T, Salminen T, Gyllenberg M, Johnson M. BODIL: a molecular modeling environment for structure-function analysis and drug design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2004;18:401-419.
27. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996;14:27-28, 33-38.
28. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1781-1802.
29. Foloppe N, Mackerell A. All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data. J Comput Chem 2000;21:86-104.
30. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madure JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935.
31. Feller SE, Zhang YH, Pastor RW, Brooks BR. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys 1995;103:4613-4621.
32. Schlick T, Skeel R, Brunger ATD, Kale LV, Board JA Jr, Hermans J, Schulte K. Computational modeling predicts the structure and ... computational molecular biophysics. J Comput Phys 1999;151:9-48.
33. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Panicle mesh Ewald-an N.Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993;98:10089-10092.
34. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995;103:8577-8593.
35. Sagui C, Darden TA. In Simulation and Theory of Electrostatic Interactions in Solution. In: Pratt LR, Hummer G, editors. American Institute of Physics, Melville, New York, 1999, pp. 104-113.
36. Toukmaji A, Sagui C, Board J, Darden T. Efficient particle-mesh Ewald based approach to fixed and induced dipolar interactions. J Chem Phys 2000;113:10913-10927.
37. Ryckaert J, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJ. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 1977;23:327-341.
38. Kraulis PJ. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24:946-950.
39. Merritt EA, Bacon DJ. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:505-524.
40. Merlino A, Vitagliano L, Ceruso MA, Mazzarella L. Dynamic properties of the N-terminal swapped dimer of ribonuclease A. Biophys J 2004;86:2383-2391.
41. Merlino A, Ceruso MA, Vitagliano L, Mazzarella L. Open interface and large quaternary structure movements in 3D domain swapped proteins: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of the C-terminal swapped dimer of ribonuclease A. Biophys J 2005;88:2003-2012.
42. Haran G, Haas E, Szpikowska BK, Mas MT. Domain motions in phosphoglycerate kinase: determination of interdomain distance distribution by site-specific labeling and time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:11764-11768.
43. Wang M, Unruh JR, Johnson CK, Kuczera K, Schowen RL, Borchardt RT. Effects of ligand binding and oxidation on hinge-bending motions in S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase. Biochemistry 2006;45:7778-7786.
44. Wang M, Chen H, Unruh J, Johnson CR, Schowen RL, Borchadt RT, Kuchera K. Dynamics of proteins and macromolecular Assemblies 32nd Steenbock Symposium 2006.
45. Liu Y, Eisenberg D. 3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap. Protein Sci 2002;11:1285-1299.
46. Rousseau F, Schymkowitz JWH, Itzhaki LS. The unfolding story of three-dimensional domain swapping. Structure 2003;11:243-251.