From non-adaptive to adaptive educational hypermedia: Theory, research, and design issues

Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 302-330

  Jacobson, Michael J ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899282589     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-690-7.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Allen, B. S., & Otto, R. G. (1996). Media as lived environments: The ecological psychology of educational technology. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 199-225). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (in press). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology.
3. Beaumont, I., & Brusilovsky, P. (1995). Educational applications of adaptive hypermedia. In K. Nordby, P. Helmersen, D. J. Gilmore, & S. A. Arnesen (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 410-414). London: Chapman & Hall.
4. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
6. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3), 87-129.
7. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3), 87-110.
8. Brusilovsky, P., & Eklund, J. (1998). A study of user model based link annotation in educational hypermedia. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 4(4), 428-448.
9. Brusilovsky, P., & Pesin, L. (1998). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: An evaluation of the ISIS-tutor. Journal of computing and Information Technology, 6(1), 27-38.
10. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Clancey, W. J. (1993). Situated action: A neuropsychological interpretation response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17, 87-116.
13. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
14. Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
16. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Berkeley Publications Group.
18. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications (pp. 9-46). New York: Academic Press.
19. Guzdial, M. (1995). Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4(1), 1-44.
20. Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(March), 159-166.
21. Hynd, C., Jacobson, M., Reinking, D., Heron, A., & Holschuh, J. (1999). Reading like a historian: Development of cross-text intertextuality and disciplinary knowledge in a hypertext environment. Paper presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
22. Jackson, S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Model-It: A design retrospective. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 77-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Jacobson, M. J. (1994). Issues in hypertext and hypermedia research: Toward a framework for linking theory-to-design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(2), 141-154.
24. Jacobson, M. J. (2004). Cognitive visualisations and the design of learning technologies. International Journal of Learning Technologies, 1(1), 40-62.
25. Jacobson, M. J., Angulo, A. J., & Kozma, R. B. (2000). Introduction: New perspectives on designing the technologies of learning. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 1-10). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000a). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 149-199.
27. Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000b). The knowledge mediator framework: Toward the design of hypermedia tools for learning. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 117-161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Jacobson, M. J. & Kozma, R. B. (Eds.). (2000). Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239-281.
30. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1991). Hypertext learning environments and cognitive flexibility: Characteristics promoting the transfer of complex knowledge. In L. Birnbaum (Ed.), The International Conference on the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of the 1991 Conference (pp. 240-248). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
31. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(5), 301-333.
32. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. S. (1997). Learning and applying difficult science knowledge: Research into the application of hypermedia learning environments (Final report to the National Science Foundation Applications of Advanced Technologies program). Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Learning and Performance Support Laboratory.
33. Jacobson, M. J., Sugimoto, A., & Archodidou, A. (1996). Evolution, hypermedia learning environments, and conceptual change: A preliminary report. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), International Conference on the Learning Sciences, 1996: Proceedings of ICLS 96 (pp. 151-158). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
34. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Koschmann, T. (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice on an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (CSCL is an abbreviation for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.)
36. Kozma, R. B. (2000). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 1-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Kozma, R. B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The role of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 105-144.
38. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 259-284.
39. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 251-283.
41. Nathan, M. J., & Resnick, L. B. (1994). Less can be more: Unintelligent tutoring based on psychological theories and experimentation. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, & H. Mandl (Eds.), Technology-based learning environments (pp. 183-192). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
42. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. (Expanded Edition). In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking, & S. Donovan (Eds.), Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. In J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. Neuman, D., Marchionini, G., & Morrell, K. (1995). Evaluating Perseus 1.0: Methods and final results. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4(4), 365-382.
45. Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R.W. (1997). Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147-177.
46. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2003). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Education Communications and Technology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Tergan, S. O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209-235.
48. Thompson, L., Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2000). Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 60-75.
49. Vosniadou, S. (1996). Learning environments for representational growth and cognitive flexibility. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 13-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
51. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 123-183.
52. Weber, G., & Specht, M. (1997). User modeling and adaptive navigation support in WWW-based tutoring systems. In A. Jameson, C. Paris, & C. Tasso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 289-300). New York: SpringerWien.
53. Wilensky, U. (1998). NetLogo Ants model. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Ants
54. Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner, & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 267-297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.