Coarse-grained Models for Simulations of Multiprotein Complexes: Application to Ubiquitin Binding

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 375, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1416-1433

  Kim, Young C ^a   Hummer, Gerhard ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

energy function; protein protein docking; protein protein interactions; ubiquitin binding domain; Vps27 Hse1

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; CARRIER PROTEIN; POLYMER; PROTEIN HSE1; PROTEIN VPS27; UBIQUITIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 37549009571     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.063     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Kleanthous C. Protein-Protein Recognition (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
2. Smith G.R., and Sternberg M.J.E. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002) 28-35
3. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., and Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47 (2002) 409-443
4. Wodak S.J., and Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 124 (1978) 323-342
5. Warwicker J. Investigating protein-protein interaction surfaces using a reduced stereochemical and electrostatic model. J. Mol. Biol. 206 (1989) 381-395
6. Totrov M., and Abagyan R. Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 Å accuracy. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1 (1994) 259-263
7. Moont G., Gabb H.A., and Sternberg M.J.E. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35 (1999) 364-373
8. Ritchie D., and Kemp G.J.L. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 39 (2000) 178-194
9. Norel R., Sheinerman F., Petrey D., and Honig B. Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis. Protein Sci. 10 (2001) 2147-2161
10. Camacho C.J., and Vajda S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98 (2001) 10636-10641
11. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci. 12 (2003) 1271-1282
12. Chen R., Mintseris J., Janin J., and Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52 (2003) 88-91
13. Schueler-Furman O., Wang C., and Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 60 (2005) 187-194
14. Wiehe K., Pierce B., Mintseris J., Tong W.W., Anderson R., Chen R., and Weng Z. ZDOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 60 (2005) 207-213
15. Zacharias M. ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 60 (2005) 252-256
16. Tovchigrechko A., and Vakser I.A. Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 60 (2005) 296-301
17. Inbar Y., Benyamini H., Nussinov R., and Wolfson H.J. Prediction of multimolecular assemblies by multiple docking. J. Mol. Biol. 349 (2005) 435-447
18. Tobi D., and Bahar I. Optimal design of protein docking potentials: efficiency and limitations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 62 (2006) 970-981
19. Janin J., Henrick K., Moult J., Eyck L., Sternberg M.J.E., Vajda S., et al. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 52 (2003) 2-9
20. Misra S., and Hurley J.H. Crystal structure of a phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate-specific membrane-targeting motif, the FYVE domain of Vps27. Cell 97 (1999) 657-666
21. Hurley J.H., and Misra S. Signaling and subcellular targeting by membrane-binding domains. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29 (2000) 49-79
22. Katzmann D.J., Babst M., and Emr S.D. Ubiquitin-dependent sorting into the multivesicular body pathway requires the function of a conserved endosomal protein sorting complex, ESCRT-I. Cell 106 (2001) 145-155
23. Gavin A.-C., et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415 (2002) 141-147
24. Katzmann D.J., Stefan C.J., Babst M., and Emr S.D. Vps27 recruits ESCRT machinery to endosomes during MVB sorting. J. Cell Biol. 160 (2003) 413-423
25. Teo H., Perisic O., González B., and Williams R.L. ESCRT-II, an endosome-associated complex required for protein sorting: crystal structure and interactions with ESCRT-III and membranes. Dev. Cell 7 (2004) 559-569
26. Miyazawa S., and Jernigan R.L. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18 (1985) 534-552
27. Miyazawa S., and Jernigan R.L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256 (1996) 623-644
28. Thomas P.D., and Dill K.A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?. J. Mol. Biol. 257 (1996) 457-469
29. Thomas P.D., and Dill K.A. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 11628-11633
30. Skolnick J., Jaroszewski L., Kolinski A., and Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct?. Protein Sci. 6 (1997) 676-688
31. Betancourt M.R., and Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci. 8 (1999) 361-369
32. Miyazawa S., and Jernigan R.L. Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 34 (1999) 49-68
33. Zhang C., and Kim S.H. Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 2550-2555
34. Glaser F., Steinberg D.M., Vakser I.A., and Ben-Tal N. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 43 (2001) 89-102
35. Ulmschneider M.B., Sansom M.S.P., and Di Nola A.D. Properties of integral membrane protein structures: derivation of an implicit membrane potential. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 59 (2005) 252-265
36. Elcock A.H., Sept D., and McCammon J.A. Computer simulation of protein-protein interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 1504-1518
37. Spaar A., Dammer C., Gabdoulline R.R., Wade R.C., and Helms V. Diffusional encounter of barnase and barstar. Biophys. J. 90 (2006) 1913-1924
38. Alsallaq R., and Zhou H.X. Prediction of protein-protein association rates from a transition-state theory. Structure 15 (2007) 215-224
39. Alsallaq R., and Zhou H.X. Energy landscape and transition state of protein-protein association. Biophys. J. 92 (2007) 1486-1502
40. Neal B.L., Asthagiri D., Velev O.D., Lenhoff A.M., and Kaler E.W. Why is the osmotic second virial coefficient related to protein crystallization?. J. Cryst. Growth 196 (1999) 377-387
41. Kang R.S., Daniels C.M., Francis S.A., Shih S.C., Salerno W.J., Hicke L., and Radhakrishnan I. Solution structure of a CUE-ubiquitin complex reveals a conserved mode of ubiquitin binding. Cell 113 (2003) 621-630
42. Paliwal A., Asthagiri D., Abras D., Lenhoff A.M., and Paulaitis M.E. Light-scattering studies of protein solutions: role of hydration in weak protein-protein interactions. Biophys. J. 89 (2005) 1564-1573
43. Swanson K.A., Kang R.S., Stamenova S.D., Hicke L., and Radhakrishnan I. Solution structure of Vps27 UIM-ubiquitin complex important for endosomal sorting and receptor downregulation. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4597-4606
44. Pelletier H., and Kraut J. Crystal structure of a complex between electron transfer partners, cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c. Science 258 (1992) 1748-1755
45. Erman J.E., and Vitello L.B. The binding of cytochrome c peroxidase and ferricytochrome c. J. Biol. Chem. 255 (1980) 6224-6227
46. Kresheck G.C., Vitello L.B., and Erman J.E. Calorimetric studies on the interaction of horse ferricytochrome c and yeast cytochrome c peroxidase. Biochemistry 34 (1995) 8398-8405
47. Lee S., Tsai Y.C., Mattera R., Smith W.J., Kostelansky M.S., Weissman A.M., et al. Structural basis for ubiquitin recognition and auto-ubiquitination by Rabex-5. Nat. Struct. Biol. 13 (2006) 264-271
48. Kang S.A., and Crane B.R. Effects of interface mutations on association modes and electron-transfer rates between proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 15465-15470
49. Tang C., Iwahara J., and Clore G.M. Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Nature 444 (2006) 383-386
50. Crowley P.B., and Ubbink M. Close encounters of the transient kind: protein interactions in the photosynthetic redox chain investigated by NMR spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 36 (2003) 723-730
51. 3 oxidase: a combined NMR and computational approach. J. Biol. Chem. 281 (2006) 14503-14513
52. Blundell T.L., and Fernández-Recio J. Brief encounters bolster contacts. Nature 444 (2006) 279-280
53. Hicke L., Schubert H.L., and Hill C.P. Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 610-621
54. Ohno A., Jee J.-G., Fujiwara K., Tenno T., Goda N., Tochio H., et al. Structure of the UBA domain of Dsk2p in complex with ubiquitin: molecular determinants for ubiquitin recognition. Structure 13 (2005) 521-532
55. Lowe E.D., Hasan N., Trempe J.-F., Fonso L., Noble M.E.M., Endicott J.A., et al. Structures of the Dsk2 UBL and UBA domains and their complex. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 62 (2006) 177-188
56. Swanson K.A., Hicke L., and Radhakrishnan I. Structural basis for monoubiquitin recognition by the Ede1 UBA domain. J. Mol. Biol. 358 (2006) 713-724
57. Prag G., Misra S., Jones E.A., Ghirlando R., Davies B.A., Horazdovsky B.F., and Hurley J.H. Mechanism of ubiquitin recognition by the CUE domain of Vps9p. Cell 113 (2003) 609-620
58. Prag G., Lee S., Mattera R., Arighi C.N., Beach B.M., Bonifacino J.S., and Hurley J.H. Structural mechanism for ubiquitinated-cargo recognition by the Golgi-localized, γ-ear-containing, ADP-ribosylation-factor-binding proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 2334-2339
59. Hirano S., Kawasaki M., Ura H., Kato R., Railborg C., Stenmark H., and Wakatsuki S. Double-sided ubiquitin binding of Hrs-UIM in endosomal protein sorting. Nat. Struct. Biol. 13 (2006) 272-277
60. Fujiwara K., Tenno T., Sugasawa K., Jee J.-G., Ohki I., Kojima C., et al. Structure of the ubiquitin-interacting motif S5a bound to the ubiquitin-like domain of HR23B. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 4760-4767
61. Mueller T.D., and Feigon J. Structural determinants for the binding of ubiquitin-like domains to the proteasome. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4634-4645
62. Heitz F., Morris M.C., Fesquet D., Cavadore J.C., Doree M., and Divita G. Interactions of cyclins with cyclin-dependent kinases: a common interactive mechanism. Biochemistry 36 (1997) 4995-5003
63. Romero G., Chau V., and Biltonen R.L. Kinetics and thermodynamics of the interaction of elongation factor Tu with elongation factor Ts, guanine nucleotides, and aminoacyl-tRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 260 (1985) 6167-6174
64. Huang M., Syed R., Stura E.A., Stone M.J., Stefanko R.S., Ruf W., et al. The mechanism of an inhibitory antibody on TF-initiated blood coagulation revealed by the crystal structures of human tissue factor, Fab 5G9 and TF.G9 complex. J. Mol. Biol. 275 (1998) 873-894
65. Akerstrom B., and Bjorck L. A physicochemical study of protein G, a molecule with unique immunoglobulin G-binding properties. J. Biol. Chem. 261 (1986) 10240-10247
66. Ascenzi P., Amiconi G., Menegatti E., Guarneri M., Bolognesi M., and Schnebli H. Binding of the recombinant proteinase inhibitor eglin c from leech Hirudo medicinalis to human leukocyte elastase, bovine alpha-chymotrypsin and subtilisin Carlsberg: thermodynamic study. J. Enzyme Inhib. 2 (1988) 167-172
67. Lee C.H., Leung B., Lemmon M.A., Zheng J., Cowburn D., Kuriyan J., and Saksela K. A single amino acid in the SH3 domain of Hck determines its high affinity and specificity in binding to HIV-1 Nef protein. EMBO J. 14 (1995) 5006-5015
68. Mannherz H.G., Goody R.S., Konrad M., and Nowak E. The interaction of bovine pancreatic deoxyribonuclease I and skeletal muscle actin. Eur. J. Biochem. 104 (1980) 367-379
69. Ward E.S., Gussow D., Griffiths A.D., Jones P.T., and Winter G. Binding activities of a repertoire of single immunoglobulin variable domains secreted from Escherichia coli. Nature 341 (1989) 544-546
70. Hurley J.H., and Emr S.D. The ESCRT complexes: structure and mechanism of a membrane-trafficking network. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35 (2006) 277-298
71. Prag G., Watson H., Kim Y.C., Beach B.M., Ghirlando R., Hummer G., et al. The Vps27/Hse1 complex is a GAT domain-based scaffold for ubiquitin-dependent sorting. Dev. Cell 12 (2007) 973-986
72. Mizuno E., Kawahata K., Kato M., Kitamura N., and Komada M. STAM proteins bind ubiquitinated proteins on the early endosome via the VHS domain and ubiquitin-interacting motif. Mol. Biol. Cell 14 (2003) 3675-3689
73. Yamakami M., Yoshimori T., and Yokosawa H. Tom1, a VHS domain-containing protein, interacts with Tollip, ubiquitin and clathrin. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 52865-52872
74. Levy Y., Cho S.S., Onuchic J.N., and Wolynes P.G. A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition on states using native topology based energy landscapes. J. Mol. Biol. 346 (2005) 1121-1145
75. Zhou H.X., and Shan Y.B. Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 44 (2001) 336-343
76. Salwinski L., and Eisenberg D. Computational methods of analysis of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13 (2003) 377-382
77. Ehrlich L.P., Nilges M., and Wade R.C. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 58 (2005) 126-133
78. Tobi D., Shafran G., Linial N., and Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 40 (2000) 71-85
79. Creighton T.E. Proteins: structures and molecular properties. 2nd edit. (1993), W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
80. Fraczkiewicz R., and Braun W. Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J. Comput. Chem. 19 (1998) 319-333
81. Best R.B., Chen Y.-G., and Hummer G. Slow protein conformational dynamics from multiple experimental structures: the helix/sheet transition of Arc repressor. Structure 13 (2005) 1755-1763
82. Karanicolas J., and Brooks C.L. The origins of asymmetry in the folding transition states of protein L and protein G. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 2351-2361
83. McLaughlin S. The electrostatic properties of membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 18 (1989) 113-136
84. Swendsen R.H., and Wang J.-S. Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2607-2609
85. Kumar S.K., Vacatello M., and Yoon D.Y. Off-lattice Monte Carlo simulations of polymer melts confined between two plates. J. Chem. Phys. 89 (1988) 5206-5215
86. Bonnete' F., Finet S., and Tardieu A. Second virial coefficient: variations with lysozyme crystallization conditions. J. Cryst. Growth 196 (1999) 403-414
87. Ruppert S., Sandler S.I., and Lenhoff A.M. Correlation between the osmotic second virial coefficient and the solubility of proteins. Biotechnol. Prog. 17 (2001) 182-187