The use of research in the seattle and Jefferson county desegregation cases: Connecting social science and the law

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 93-120

  Tropp, Linda R ^a   Smith, Amy E ^b   Crosby, Faye J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEGISLATION; RACIAL SEGREGATION;

JEFFERSON COUNTY [WASHINGTON]; NORTH AMERICA; SEATTLE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 37249085654     PISSN: 15297489     EISSN: 15302415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00149.x     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Aboud, F. E., & Levy, S. R. (2000). Interventions to reduce prejudice and discrimination in children and adolescents. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 269-293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and race relations. In P. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 245-308). New York: Pergamon.
3. Armor, D. J. (2002). Desegregation and academic achievement. In C. H. Rossell, D. J. Armor, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), School desegregation in the 21st century (pp. 148-187). Westport, CT: Praeger.
4. Astin, A. W. (1982). Minorities in American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
6. Barata, P., & Senn, C. (2003). When two fields collide: An examination of the assumptions of social science research and law within the domain of domestic violence. Trauma Violence Abuse, 4(1), 3-21.
7. Bersoff, D. (1986). Psychologists and the judicial system: Broader perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 10(1/2), 151-165.
8. Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242-261.
9. Blank, R. M., Dabady, M., & Citro, C. F. (Eds.) (2004). Measuring racial discrimination. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
10. Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954).
11. Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000).
12. Braddock, J. H., Dawkins, M. P., & Trent, W. (1994). Why desegregate? The effect of school desegregation on adult occupational desegregation of African Americans, Whites and Hispanics. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 31, 273-283.
13. Braddock, J. H., & Eitle, T. M. (2004). The effects of school desegregation. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 828-843). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Braddock, J. H., & McPartland, J. M. (1989). Social psychological processes that perpetuate racial desegregation: The relationship between school and employment desegregation. Journal of Black Studies, 19, 267-289.
15. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.
16. Brewer, M. B., von Hippel, W., & Gooden, M. P. (1999). Diversity and organizational identity: The problem of entrée after entry. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.). Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 337-363). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Briggs v. Elliott, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
18. Brown et al v. Board of Ed of Topeka, et al (Brown I), 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
19. Brown et al v. Board of Ed of Topeka et al. (Brown II), 349 U.S. 294 (1955).
20. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 255-343). San Diego: Academic Press.
21. Brown, R., Vivian, J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 741-764.
22. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson, 488 U.S. 469 (1989).
23. Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., & Clark, V. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model. American Psychologist, 54(10), 805-816.
24. Clark, K. B., Chein, I., & Cook, S. W. (2004). The effects of segregation and the consequences of desegregation: A social science statement in the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Supreme Court Case. American Psychologist, 59, 495-501 (Reprinted, original work published in September 1952).
25. Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 209-235.
26. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interactions in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
27. Crain, R. L., & Mahard, R. E. (1981). The consequences of controversy accompanying institutional change: The case of school desegregation. American Sociological Review, 47, 697-708.
28. Crisp R. J., Stone, C. H., & Hall, N. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 230-243.
29. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Crosby, F. J. (2000). Introduction. In F. J. Crosby and C. Van deVeer (Eds.), Sex, race, and merit: Debating affirmative action in education and employment (pp. 1-10). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
31. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93-115.
32. Crosby, F. J., Clayton, S., Downing, R. A., & Iyer, A. (2004). Values and science. American Psychologist, 59, 125-126.
33. Crosby, F. J., & Smith, A. E. (2007). The University of Michigan cases: Social scientific studies of diversity and fairness. In R. L. Weiner, B. Bornstein, R. Schopp, & S. Willborn (Eds.), Social consciousness in legal decision making (pp. 121-142). New York: Springer.
34. Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800-814.
35. Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (3), 316-328.
36. Davis v. School Board of Prince Edward County, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
37. Devine, P. G., & Vasquez, K. A. (1998). The rocky road to positive intergroup relations. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 234-262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American =White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 447-466.
39. Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2003). Contact and the ecology of racial division: Some varieties of informal segregation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 1-23.
40. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510-540.
41. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2000). Group identity and intergroup relations: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. In S. Thye, E. J. Lawler, M. Macy, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 1-35). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
42. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 5-21.
43. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Hodson, G., Riek, B. M., Johnson, K. M., & Houlette, M. (2006). Recategorization and crossed categorization: The implications of group salience and representations for reducing bias. In R. J. Crisp & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Multiple Social Categorization: Processes, models and applications (pp. 65-89). New York: Psychology Press.
44. Du Bois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing and method in feminist social science. In G. Bowles & R. D. Klein (Eds.), Theories of women's studies (pp. 105-115). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
45. Eggins, R. A., Haslam, S. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2002). Social identity and negotiation: Subgroup representation and superordinate consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 887-899.
46. Eibach, R. P., & Ehrlinger, J. (2006). "Keep your eyes on the prize": Reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 66-77.
47. Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385-400.
48. Emerson, M. O., Yancey, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in segregation? Exploring the preferences of White Americans. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 922-935.
49. Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2002). The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 313-329.
50. Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: AntiBlack discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 101-116.
51. Finkel, N. (1997). Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law: prototypes that are common, senseful, and not. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3(2/3), 461-489.
52. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
53. Ford, W. S. (1986). Favorable intergroup contact may not reduce prejudice: Inconclusive journal evidence, 1960-1984. Sociology and Social Research, 70, 256-258.
54. Frankenberg, E., Lee, C., and Orfield, G. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
55. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York: Psychology Press.
56. Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 230-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Gebhardt v. Belton, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
58. González, R., & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195-214.
59. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2002). Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22(2), 173-199.
60. Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).
61. Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
62. Gurin, P. (2004). The educational value of diversity. In P. Gurin, J. S. Lehman, & E. Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 97-188). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
63. Guryan, J. (2004). Desegregation and Black dropout rates. American Economic Review, 94(4), 919-943.
64. Hallinan, M. T., & Teixeira, R. A. (1987). Opportunities and constraints: Black-White differences in the formation of interracial friendships. Child Development, 58, 1358-1371.
65. Hallinan, M. T., & Williams, R. (1989). Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. American Sociological Review, 54, 67-78.
66. Haney, C. (1980). Psychology and legal change: On the limits of a factual jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 147-199.
67. Haney, C. (1991). The Fourteenth Amendment and symbolic legality: Let them eat due process. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 183-204.
68. Haney, C. (2002). Making law modern: Toward a contextual model of justice. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 8, 3-63.
69. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of 'The Troubles' in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 99-120.
70. Horenczyk, G. (1996). Migrant identities in conflict: Acculturation attitudes and perceived acculturation ideologies. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 241-250). Woburn, MA: ButterworthHeinemann.
71. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
72. Hunt, M. O., Jackson, P. B., Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (2000). Color-blind: The treatment of race and ethnicity in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 352-364.
73. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365-371.
74. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 496-528). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., & Moll, J. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 871-888.
76. Kendler, H. H. (1999). The role of value in the world of psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 828-835.
77. Kendler, H. H. (2004). Politics and science: A combustible mixture. American Psychologist, 59, 122-123.
78. Krieger, N. (2000). Discrimination and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 36-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Krieger, L. (2004). The intuitive psychologist behind the bench: Models of gender bias in social psychology and employment discrimination law. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 835-848.
80. Lehman, J. S. (2004). The evolving language of diversity and integration in discussions of affirmative action from Bakke to Grutter. In P. Gurin, J. S. Lehman, & E. Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 61-96). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
81. Lord, C. G., & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 918-926.
82. Manuto, R., & O'Rourke, S. (1991). Federal judges' perceptions of social research in judicial decision-making. Communication Reports, 4(2), 103-106.
83. Margie, N. G., Killen, M., & Sinno, S. (2005). Minority children's intergroup attitudes about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 251-269.
84. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. McGlothlin, H., & Killen, M. (2006). Intergroup attitudes of European American children attending ethnically homogeneous schools. Child Development, 77(5), 1375-1386.
86. McGlothlin, H., Killen, M., & Edmonds, C. (2005). European-American children's intergroup attitudes about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 227-249.
87. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520.
88. Melton, G. (1987). Bringing psychology to the legal system; opportunities, obstacles, and efficacy. American Psychologist, 42, 488-499.
89. Melton, G. (1990). Law, science, and humanity: The normative foundation of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 315-332.
90. Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896-918.
91. Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, No. 05-915, 551 U.S. (2007).
92. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
93. Mickelson, R. A., & Heath, D. (1999). The effects of segregation and tracking on African American high school seniors' academic achievement. Journal of Negro Education, 68(4), 566-586.
94. Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1988). Social science research in law: A new paradigm. American Psychologist, 43, 465-472.
95. Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1991). Judicial use of social science research. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 571-584.
96. Newman, J. D. (1989). Affirmative action and the courts. In F. A. Blanchard & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 31-49). New York: Springer-Verlag.
97. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2007). Historical references, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA.
98. Parents Involved in Community Schools, Petitioner v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al., No. 05-908, 551 U.S. (2007).
99. Patchen, M. (1982). Black-white contact in schools: Its social and academic effects. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
100. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
101. Pettigrew, T. F. (2004). Justice deferred: A half century after Brown v. Board of Education. American Psychologist, 59, 521-529.
102. Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(4), 411-425.
103. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2005). Allport's intergroup contact hypothesis: Its history and influence. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, and L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 262-277). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
104. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
105. Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
106. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
107. Popper, K. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1963).
108. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989).
109. Quillian, L., & Campbell, M. E. (2003). Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review, 68(4), 540-566.
110. Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000).
111. Roesch, R., Golding, S., Hans, V., & Reppucci, N. (1991). Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs. Law and Human Behavior, 15(1), 1-11.
112. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Revised ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
113. Rudman, L. A., Ashmore, R. D., & Gary, M. L. (2001). 'Unlearning' automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 856-868.
114. Schofield, J. W. (1995). Promoting positive intergroup relations in school settings. In W. Hawley & A. Jackson (Eds.), Toward a common destiny: Improving race relations in American society (pp. 257-289). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
115. Schofield, J. W. (2001a). Review of research on school desegregation's impact on elementary and secondary school students. In J. A. Banks & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 597-616). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
116. Schofield, J. W. (2001b). Maximizing the benefits of student diversity: Lessons from school desegregation research. In G. Orfield (Ed.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 99-109). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
117. Schofield, J. W., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (2004). School desegregation and social science research. American Psychologist, 59(6), 538-546.
118. Schofield, J. W., & Eurich-Fulcer, R. (2004). When and how school desegregation improves intergroup relations. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Applied Social Psychology (pp. 186-205). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
119. Schofield, J. W., & Sagar, W. A. (1977). Peer interaction patterns in an integrated middle school. Sociometry, 40, 130-139.
120. Sheldon, K., Schmuck, P., & Kasser, T. (2000). Is value-free science possible? American Psychologist, 55(10), 1152.
121. Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., & Levin, S. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 102-133.
122. Sidanius, J., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 96-110.
123. Smith, M. B. (1991). Values, self, and society: Toward a humanist social psychology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
124. Smith, M. B. (2000). Values, politics, and psychology. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1151.
125. Smith, A. E., & Crosby, F. J. (2007). From Kansas to Michigan: The path from desegregation to diversity. In G. Adams, M. Biernat, N. Branscombe, C. Crandall, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Commemorating Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination. Washington, DC: APA Books.
126. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797-811.
127. Stephan, W. G. (2002). Improving intergroup relations in the schools. In C. H. Rossell, D. J. Armor, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), School desegregation in the 21st century (pp. 267-289). Westport, CT: Praeger.
128. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., Fitzgerald, D. C., & Bylsma, W. H. (2003). African American college students' experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38-67.
129. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
130. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
131. Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Intergroup contact and the improvement of intergroup relations. In M. Fitzduff & C. Stout (Eds.), The psychology of resolving global conflicts: From war to peace (Vol. 2, pp. 6-107). Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
132. Thompson, M., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2002). When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 183-203.
133. Tremper, C. (1987). Sanguinity and disillusionment where law meets social science. Law and Human Behavior, 11(4), 267-276.
134. Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).
135. Tropp, L. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
136. Tropp, L. R., & Bianchi, R. A. (2007). Interpreting references to group membership in context: Feelings about intergroup contact depending upon who says what to whom. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 153-170.
137. Tropp, L. R., & Prenovost, M. (in press). The role of intergroup contact in predicting interethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta-analytic and field studies. To appear in S. Levy and M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
139. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369-388.
140. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
141. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and the courts. New York: Russell Sage.
142. van Oudenhoven, J. P., Groenewoud, J. T., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 649-661.
143. Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380-390.
144. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 456-467.
145. Wells, A. S. (1995). Reexamining social science research on school desegregation. Long- versus short-term effects. Teachers College Record, 94, 691-706.
146. Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64, 531-556.
147. Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J. S., & Anderson, N. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress and discrimination. American Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335-351.