Social identity and negotiation: Subgroup representation and superordinate consensus

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 887-899

  Eggins, Rachael A ^a   Haslam, S Alexander ^b   Reynolds, Katherine J ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047689916     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014616720202800703     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bacharach, S., & Lawler, E. (1981), Bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Bourhis, R. Y., Turner, J. C., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Interdependence, social identity and discrimination. In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 273-295). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4. Brown, R., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
5. Coser, L. (1962). Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
6. de Dreu, C. (1995). Coercive power and concession making in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 646-670.
7. de Dreu, C., Carnevale, P., Emans, B., & Van de Vliert, E. (1995). Outcome frames in bilateral negotiation: Resistance to concession making and frame adoption, European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 97-125.
8. de Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
9. Deschamps, J.-C. (1984). The social psychology of intergroup relations and categorical differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Eds.), The social dimension (pp. 541-559). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Deutsch, M. (1990). Cooperation, conflict and justice. In S. Wheelan, E. Pepitone, & J. Abt (Eds.), Advances infield theory (pp. 149-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Douglas, A. (1957). The peaceful settlement of industrial intergroup disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 489-510.
12. Eggins, R. A., Reynolds, K. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Working with identities: The ASPIRe model of organizational planning, negotiation and development. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
13. Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. A. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
14. Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of re-categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
15. Grant, P. (1990). Cognitive theories applied to intergroup conflict. In R. J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup and international conflict resolution (pp. 39-57). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage Ltd.
17. Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2000). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to improve strategic planning and encourage sustainable productivity in organizations. Unpublished manuscript, The Australian National University.
18. Hewstone, M., Fincham, F., & Jaspars, J. (1981). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior: A replication with "penalties." European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 101-107.
19. Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
20. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper.
21. Messick, D., & Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
22. Moreland, R. L., &: Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
24. Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherall (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford, UK: Blackball.
25. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Oakes, P. J., & Reynolds, K. J. (1997). Asking the accuracy question: Is measurement the answer? In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 51-71). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Pruitt, D. (1972). Methods for resolving differences of interest: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 133-154.
28. Pruitt, D. G., Pierce, R. S., Zubek, J. M., McGillicuddy, N. B., & Welton, G. L. (1993). Determinants of short-term and long-term success in mediation. In S. Worschel & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Conflict between people and groups: Causes, processes, and resolutions. Nelson Hall series in psychology (pp. 60-75). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
29. Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 64-80.
30. Rothbart, M. (1993). Intergroup perception and social conflict. In S. Worschel & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Conflict between people and groups: Causes, processes, and resolutions. Nelson Hall series in psychology (pp. 93-109). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31. Stephenson, G. M. (1984). Intergroup and interpersonal dimensions of bargaining and negotiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (pp. 646-667). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
33. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35. Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Eds.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Turner, J. C. ( 1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
38. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. ( 1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
39. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Co-operation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
41. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-929.
42. Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153-172.
43. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990).Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.