Assessing the energy landscape of CAPRI targets by FunHunt

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 809-815

  London, Nir ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

CAPRI; Docking; Energy funnel; Energy landscape; High resolution modeling; Model selection; Protein protein interactions; RosettaDock; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

RUMEX;

EID: 36749091035     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21736     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:28-35.
2. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
3. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
4. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
5. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
6. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
7. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
8. Mendez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
9. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
10. Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:110-116.
11. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
12. Janin J. Assessing predictions of protein-protein interaction: the CAPRI experiment. Protein Sci 2005;14:278-283.
13. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:183-193.
14. Wang C, Bradley P, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.050.
15. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
16. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D. Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 2005;310:638-642.
17. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005;60:187-194.
18. London N, Schueler-Furman O. Funnel hunting in a rough terrain: learning and discriminating native energy funnels. Submitted.
19. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support vector networks. Machine Learning 1995;20:273-293.
20. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. J Mol Biol 2004;335:843-865.
21. Kozakov D, Clodfelter KH, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Optimal clustering for detecting near-native conformations in protein docking. Biophys J 2005;89:867-875.
22. Carvalho AL, Dias FM, Prates JA, Nagy T, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Ferreira LM, Romao MJ, Fontes CM. Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13809-13814.
23. Graille M, Stura EA, Bossus M, Muller BH, Letourneur O, Battail-Poirot N, Sibai G, Gauthier M, Rolland D, Le Du MH, Ducancel F. Crystal structure of the complex between the monomeric form of Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen 1 (SAG1) and a monoclonal antibody that mimics the human immune response. J Mol Biol 2005;354:447-458.
24. Terrak M, Kerff F, Langsetmo K, Tao T, Dominguez R. Structural basis of protein phosphatase 1 regulation. Nature 2004;429:780-784.
25. Graille M, Mora L, Buckingham RH, van Tilbeurgh H, de Zamaroczy M. Structural inhibition of the colicin D tRNase by the tRNA-mimicking immunity protein. EMBO J 2004;23:1474-1482.
26. Sansen S, De Ranter CJ, Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Rabijns A. Structural basis for inhibition of Aspergillus niger xylanase by triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor-I. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36022-36028.
27. Eghiaian F, Grosclaude J, Lesceu S, Debey P, Doublet B, Treguer E, Rezaei H, Knossow M. Insight into the PrPC→PrPSc conversion from the structures of antibody-bound ovine prion scrapie-susceptibility variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:10254-10259.
28. Hou Z, Bernstein DA, Fox CA, Keck JL. Structural basis of the Sir1-origin recognition complex interaction in transcriptional silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:8489-8494.
29. Menetrey J, Perderiset M, Cicolari J, Dubois T, Elkhatib N, El Khadali F, Franco M, Chavrier P, Houdusse A. Structural basis for ARF1-mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes. EMBO J 2007;26:1953-1962.
30. Bonsor DA, Grishkovskaya I, Dodson EJ, Kleanthous C. Molecular mimicry enables competitive recruitment by a natively disordered protein. J Am Chem Soc 2007;129:4800-4807.
31. Walker JR, Awakumov GV, Xue S, Newman EM, Mackenzie F, Weigelt J, Sundstrom M, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Bochkarev A, Dhe-Paganon S. A novel and unexpected complex between the SUMO-1-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25 kDa, in press.
32. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W363-W367.
33. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.
34. Glaser F, Rosenberg Y, Kessel A, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. The ConSurf-HSSP database: the mapping of evolutionary conservation among homologs onto PDB structures. Proteins 2005;58:610-617.
35. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
36. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
37. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93.
38. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Schoelkopf C, Burges C, Smola A, editors. Advances in kernel methods - support vector learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999. pp 41-56.
39. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning 2002;46:389-422.
40. Velge-Roussel F, Dimier-Poisson I, Buzoni-Gatel D, Bout D. Anti-SAG1 peptide antibodies inhibit the penetration of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites into enterocyte cell lines. Parasitology 2001;123:225-233.
41. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
42. Pierce B, Weng Z. ZRANK: reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins 2007;67:1078-1086.
43. Fernandez-Recio J, Abagyan R, Totrov M. Improving CAPRI predictions: optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking. Proteins 2005;60:308-313.
44. de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Bonvin AM. WHISCY: what information does surface conservation yield? Application to data-driven docking. Proteins 2006;63:479-489.
45. Bernauer J, Aze J, Janin J, Poupon A. A new protein-protein docking scoring function based on interface residue properties. Bioinformatics 2007;23:555-562.
46. Law DS, Ten Eyck LF, Katzenelson O, Tsigelny I, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Mitchell JC. Finding needles in haystacks: reranking DOT results by using shape complementarity, cluster analysis, and biological information. Proteins 2003;52:33-40.