Student positioning within groups during science activities

Research in Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 35-54

  Ritchie, S M ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242734297     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015046621428     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Australian Academy of Science. (1994). Primary investigations: Student book 6 - energy and investigation. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
2. Bianchini, J. (1995, April). How do middle school students learn science in groups? An analysis of scientific content and social processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
3. Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(10), 1039-1065.
4. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
5. Davies, B. (1996). Power/knowledge/desire. Changing school organisation and management practices. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
6. Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32-52). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
7. Davies, B. & Hunt, R. (1994). Classroom competencies and marginal positions. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 389-408.
8. Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality (Vol 1): An introduction. London: Allen Lane [Fr 1976].
9. Gaskell, P. J., Hepburn, G., & Robeck, E. (1998). Re/presenting a gender equity project: Contrasting visions and versions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 859-876.
10. Harré, R. & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
11. Harré, R. & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
12. Henwood, F. (1998). Engineering difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology. Gender and Education, 10(1), 35-49.
13. Hicks, D. (1996). Learning as a prosaic act. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(2), 102-118.
14. Hodges, D. C. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(4), 272-290.
15. Johnston, M. & Kerper, R. M. (1996). Positioning ourselves: Parity and power in collaborative work. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(1), 5-24.
16. Rennie, L. J. (1998). Gender equity: Toward clarification and a research direction for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(8), 951-961.
17. Rennie, L. J. (2000). Equity in science education: Gender is just one variable: Reply to Atwater. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 391-393.
18. Ritchie, S. M. (1998). The teacher's role in the transformation of students' understanding. Research In Science Education, 28(2), 169-185.
19. Ritchie, S. M. (1999). The craft of intervention: A personal practical theory for a teacher's within-group interactions. Science Education, 83(2), 213-231.
20. Ritchie, S. M. & Rigano, D. L. (2001). Researcher - participant positioning in classroom research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(6), 741-756.
21. Ritchie, S. M., Rigano, D. L., & Lowry, R. J. (2000). Shifting power relations in 'the getting of wisdom.' Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 165-177.
22. Ritchie, S. M. & Tobin, K. (2001). Actions and discourses for transformative understanding in a middle school science class. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 283-299.
23. Roth, W.-M. & Harama, H. (in press). (Standard) English as second language: Tribulations of self. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
24. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. M. (2001). Re/Constructing elementary science. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
25. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: The Falmer Press.
26. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
27. van Langenhove, L. & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14-31). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.