University patenting and the pace of industrial innovation

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 505-534

  Fabrizio, Kira R ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; KNOWLEDGE; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

EID: 34548272688     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtm016     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Arora, A. (2002), 'Licensing tacit knowledge: Intellectual property rights and the market for know-how,'Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4(1), 41-59.
2. Arrow, K. (1971), 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for R&D' in Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Markham Publishing Co: Chicago, IL.
3. Bertrand, M., E. Duflo and S. Mullainathan (2004), 'How much should we trust differences in-differences estimates?,' The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 199(1), 249.
4. Blumenthal, D., E. Campbell, M. Anderson, N. Causino and K. Louis (1996a), 'Withholding research results in academic lifescience: Evidence from a national survey of faculty,' Journal of The American Medical Association, 277 (15), 1224-1228.
5. Blumenthal, D., N. Causino, E. Campbell and K. Seashore (1996b), 'Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences-an industry survey,' The New England Journal of Medicine, 334(6), 368-373.
6. Blumenthal, D., M. Gluck, K. Lewis, M. Stoto and D. Wise (1986), 'University-industry relations in biotechnology: Implications for the university,' Science, 2332, 1361-1366.
7. Campbell, E. G., B. R. Clarridge, M. Gokhale, L. Birenbaum, S. Hilgartner, N. A. Holtzman and D. Blumenthal (2002), 'Data withholding in academic genetics,'JAMA, 287(4), 473-80.
8. Cockburn, I. M. and R. Henderson (1998), 'Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery,'The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI(2), 157-182.
9. Cockburn, I. M. and R. M. Henderson (2001), 'Publicly funded science and the productivity of the pharmaceutical industry,' in A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Cohen, W. M. (2005), 'Patents and appropriation: Concerns and evidence,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 57-71.
11. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1989), 'Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D,' The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
12. Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson and J. P. Walsh (2000), Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not), NBER Working Paper, (7552).
13. Cohen, W. M., R. R. Nelson and J. P. Walsh (2002), 'Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D,' Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
14. Colyvas, J., M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R. R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg and B. N. Sampat (2002), 'Do university inventions get into practice?,' Management Science, 48(1), 61-72.
15. Dasgupta, P. and P. A. David (1994), 'Toward a new economics of science,' Research Policy, 23, 487-521.
16. David, P., A. Desai and M. Teubal (1992a), 'Knowledge, property, and the system dynamics of technological change; comments,' The World Bank Research Observer, 215-255.
17. David, P., D. C. Mowery and W. E. Steinmueller (1992b), 'Analysing the economic payoffs from basic research,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2, 73-90.
18. David, P. A. (1998), 'Common agency contracting and the emergence of "open science" institutions,' The American Economic Review, 88(2), 15-21.
19. Evenson, R. E. and Y. Kislev (1976), 'A stochastic model of applied research,' The Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), 265-282.
20. Fabrizio, K. R. (2006), Absorptive Capacity and Innovation: Evidence from Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Firms, Working Paper.
21. Feller, I. (1990), 'Universities as engines of R&D-based economic growth: They think they can,' Research Policy, 19, 335-348.
22. Fleming, L. and O. Sorenson (2004), 'Science as a map in technological search,' Strategic Management Journal, 25, 909-928.
23. Gallini, N. T. (2002), 'The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform,' Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 2), 131-154.
24. Gambardella, A. (1992), 'Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US Pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s,' Research Policy, 21, 391-407.
25. Griliches, Z. (1990), 'Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey,' Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
26. Griliches, Z. (1995), 'R&D and productivity: Econometric results and measurement issues,' in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Blackwell: Oxford UK and Cambridge, USA.
27. Grossman, J. H., P. P. Reid and R. P. Morgan (2001), 'Contributions of academic research to industrial performance in five sectors,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 143-152.
28. Hall, B., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (2001), The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools, NBER Working Paper, (8498).
29. Hall, B. H., A. N. Link and J. T. Scott (2001a), 'Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from advanced technology program,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 1-2), 87-99.
30. Henderson, R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998a), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 1), 119-127.
31. Jaffe, Trajtenburg Fogarty (2000), 'Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors,' AEA Papers and Proceedings, 90(2), 215.
32. Jaffe, A. (2000), 'The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process,' Research Policy, 29, 531.
33. Jaffe, A. and M. Trajtenberg (1996), 'Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries,' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12671-12677.
34. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson (1993), 'Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
35. Kline S. and N. Rosenberg (1986), 'An overview of innovation,' in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
36. Lamoreaux, N. and K. Sokoloff (1999), Inventive Activity and the Market for Technology in the United States, 1840 - 1920, NBER Working Paper, 7107.
37. Liebeskind, J. P., A. L. Oliver, L. Zucker and M. Brewer (1996), 'Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms,' Organization Science, 7 (4), 428-443.
38. Louis, K., L. Jones, M. Anderson, D. Blumenthal and E. Campbell (2001), 'Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical faculty,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 3), 233-45.
39. Mansfield, E. (1991), 'Academic research and industrial innovation,' Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
40. Mansfield, E. (1995), 'Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing,' The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 55-65.
41. Mansfield, E. (1998), 'Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings,' Research Policy, 26, 773-76.
42. Mansfield, E. and Y. Lee (1996), 'The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support,' Research Policy, 25, 1047-1058.
43. Mazzoleni, R. and R. R. Nelson (1998), 'The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: A contribution to the current debate,' Research Policy, 27, 273-284.
44. McMillan, G. S., F. Narin and D. L. Deeds (2000), 'An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology,' Research Policy, 29, 1-8.
45. Mowery, D. C., R. R. Nelson, B. N. Sampat and A. A. Ziedonis (2001), 'The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980,' Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119.
46. Mowery, D. C. and N. Rosenberg (1979), 'The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies,' Research Policy, 8, 102-153.
47. Mowery, D. C. and A. A. Ziedonis (2002), 'Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States,' Research Policy, 31(3), 366-418.
48. Murray, F. and S. Stern (2005), Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? NBER Working Paper 11465.
49. Narin, F. (1994), 'Patent Bibliometrics,' Scientometrics, 30 1), 147-155.
50. Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton and D. Olivestro (1997), 'The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science,' Research Policy 26, 317-330.
51. Narin, F. and D. Olivastro (1992), 'Status report: Linkage between technology and science,' Research Policy, 21, 237-249.
52. Nelson, R. R. (1959), 'The simple economics of basic scientific research,' Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297-306.
53. Nelson, R. R. (1982), 'The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency,' Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(3), 453-70.
54. Nelson, R. R. (1990), 'Capitalism as an engine of progress,' Research Policy, 19, 193-214.
55. Nelson, R. R. (2001), 'Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole rise in patenting at American Universities,' Journal of Technology Transfer 261-213-19.
56. Rahm (1995), University-Firm Linkages for Industrial Innovation' Department of Government and International Affairs. University of South Florida.
57. Rosenberg, N. (1974), 'Science, invention and economic growth,' The Economic Journal, 84(333), 90-108.
58. Rothaermel, F. T. and M. Thursby (2005), 'University-incubator firm knowledge flows: Assessing their impact on incubator performance,' Research Policy, 34, 305-320.
59. Sampat, B., D. Mowery and A. Ziedonis (2003), 'Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination,' International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1371-1390.
60. Siegel, D. S., D. Waldman and A. Link (1999), 'Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study,' Research Policy, 32 27-48.
61. Siegel, D. S., D. A. Waldman, L. E. Atwater and A. N. Link (2003b), 'Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration,' The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-133.
62. Teece, D. J. (1988), 'Capturing value from technological innovation: integration, strategic partnering, and licensing decisions,' Interfaces, 18(3), 46-61.
63. Teece, D. J. (1996), 'Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 193-224.
64. The Council on Governmental Relations (1993), The Bayh-Dole Act: A guide to the law and implementing regulations. Author: Boston, available at: http://web.mit.edu/osp/WNW/cogr/univ.html.
65. Trajtenberg, M., R. Henderson and A. Jaffe (1997), 'Universities vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of innovations,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19-50.
66. Walsh, J. P., A. Arora and W. M. Cohen (2003), 'Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation,' in W. M. Cohen and S. A. Merrill (eds), Patents in the Knowledge- Based Economy. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.
67. Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies. The Free Press: New York, New York.
68. Williamson, O. E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. The Free Press: New York, New York.
69. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
70. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and J. S. Armstrong (2002), 'Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology,' Management Science, 48(1), 138-152.
71. Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and M. B. Brewer (1998), 'Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises,' American Economic Review, 88(1), 290-306.