Patents and appropriation: Concerns and evidence

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 30, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 57-71

  Cohen, Wesley M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Innovation; Patents; R D

Indexed keywords

PATENT LITIGATION; PATENTS;

INNOVATION;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 34548276676     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-004-4358-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allison, J.R. and M.A. Lemley, 1998, 'Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents,' AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26 (3), 185-275.
2. American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), 1997, 2001, 2003 'Report of the Economic Survey,' AI-PLA, Washington, DC.
3. Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli and W.M. Cohen, 2004, 'R&D and the Patent Premium,' Mimeo, Carnegie Mellon University.
4. Arora, A., A. Fosfuri and A. Gambardella, 2001, Markets for Technology:EConomics of Innovation and Corporate Strat-egy, MIT Press: Cambridge.
5. Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 2002, 'The AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year 2002,' Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, Connecticut.
6. Barton, J., 2000, 'Intellectual Property Rights.Reforming the Patent System,' Science 287, 1933-1934.
7. Cohen, W.M., 2002, 'The pro-patent movement in the United States: Indicators and Impacts,' in Institute on Intellectual Property, Report on Patents and the Economy, Tokyo.
8. Cohen, W.M. and S. Merrill, eds., 2003, Patents in the Knowl-edge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Acade-mies Press.
9. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh, 2000, 'Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and why U.S.Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not),' NBER Working Paper 7522 (revised, 2004, as mimeo, Duke Uni-versity).
10. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh, 2002, 'Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D,' Management Science 48 (1), 1-23.
11. Evenson, R.and Y. Kislev, 1976, 'A Stochastic Model of Applied Research,' Journal of Political Economy 84, 265-281.
12. Federal Trade Commission, 2003, 'To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy,' Washington: Federal Trade Commission, October.
13. Hall, B.H, S. Graham, D. Harhoff and D.C. Mowery, 2004, 'Prospects for improving U.S.Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition,' in Innovation Policy and the Economy, A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Hall, B.H. and R.H. Ziedonis, 2001, 'The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995,' R&D Journal of Economics 32 (1), 101-128.
15. Heller, M.A. and R.S. Eisenberg, 1998, 'Can patents deter innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research,' Science 280 (May 1), 698-701.
16. Henderson, R., L. Orsenigo and G.P. Pisano, 1999, 'The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions among Scientific, Institutional and (eds.), Organizational Change,' in D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries, New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro and K. Hamilton, 2001, 'The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the US-A Portrait based on Patent Analysis,' Research Policy 30 (4), 681-704.
18. Jaffe, A., 2000, 'The U.S.Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation process,' Research Policy 29, 531-558.
19. Kingston, W., 2001, 'Innovation Needs Patent Reform,' Research Policy 30, 403-423.
20. Koenig, G., 1980, Patent Invalidity: A Statistical and Substan-tive Analysis, Clark Boardman, New York.
21. Kortum, S.and J. Lerner, 1999, 'What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?,' Research Policy 28, 1-22.
22. Lanjouw, J.O. and J. Lerner, 1998, 'The enforcement of Intel-lectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Litera-ture, 'Annales d 'Economie et de Statistique No. 49 /50, 223-246.
23. Lanjouw, J.O. and M.Schankerman, 2003, 'Enforcement of Patent Rights in the United States,' in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.
24. Levin, R., 1982, 'The Semiconductor Industry,' in R.R.Nel-son (ed.), Government and Technical Progress: A Cross-Industry Analysis, New York: Pergamon Press.
25. Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter, 1987, 'Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 783-820.
26. Levin, R.C. and J. Levin, 2003, 'Benefit and Costs of an Opposition Process,' in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.
27. Mansfield, E., 1986, 'Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study,' Management Science 32, 173-181.
28. Mazzoleni, R.and R.R. Nelson, 1998, 'Economic theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents,' Journal of Eco-nomic Issues 32 (4), 1031-1052.
29. Merges, R., 1994, 'Intellectual Property Rights and Bargain-ing Breakdown: the Case of Blocking Patents,' Tennessee Law Review 62 (1), 74-106.
30. Merges, R., 1999, 'As Many as Six Impossible Patents before Breakfast:PRoperty Rights for Business Concepts Cohen.and Patent System Reform,' Berkeley High Technology Law Journal 14, 577-615.
31. Merges, R.and R.R. Nelson, 1990, 'On the Complex Eco-nomics of Patent Scope,' Columbia Law Review, May.
32. National Research Council (NRC), 2004, A Patent System for the 21st Century, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.
33. Nelson, R.R., 1982, 'The Role of Knowledge in R&D Effi-ciency,' Quarterly Journal of Economics 97, 453-470.
34. Nelson, R.R., 2004, 'The Market Economy and the Scientific Commons,' Research Policy 33 (3), 455-472.
35. Quillen, C.D. and O.H. Webster, 2001, 'Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S.Patent Office,' Federal Circuit Bar Journal 11 (1), 1-21.
36. Schankerman, M.and A. Pakes, 1986, 'Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During the Post-1950 Period,' The Economic Journal 96, 1052-1076.
37. Scherer, F.M. et al., 1959, Patents and the Corporation, 2nd edn, Boston, privately published.
38. Scherer, F.M. and D. Harhoff, 2000, 'Technology Policy for a World of Skew-distributed Outcomes,' Research Policy 29, 559-566.
39. Scotchmer, S, 1991, 'Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law,' Journal of Eco-nomic Perspectives 5, 29-41.
40. Shapiro, C., 2000, 'Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, 'in Innova-tion Policy and the Economy, Vol.1, A. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), Cambridge, National Bureau of Eco-nomic Research and MIT Press.
41. Taylor, C.T. and Z.A. Silberston, 1973, The Economic Impact of the Patent System: A Study of the British Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. von Hippel, E., 1988, The Sources of Innovation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Walsh, J.P., A. Arora, and W.M. Cohen, 2003, 'E.ects of Research Tool Patents and Licensing on Biomedical Inno-vation,' in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC. National Academies Press.
44. Walsh, J.P., A. Arora and W.M Cohen, 2003b, 'Working through the Patent Problem,' Science 299 (Feb.14), 121.
45. Warshofsky, F., 1994, The Patent Wars: The Battle to Own the World's Technology, New York: Wiley and Sons.
46. Ziedonis, R.H., 2003, 'Patent litigation in the U.S.semicon-ductor industry,' in W. Cohen and S. Merrill (eds.), Pat-ents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Washington, DC.: National Academies Press.