Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection

American Naturalist

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 240-253

  Blows, Mark W ^a   Higgie, Megan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

G matrix, experimental evolution; Mate recognition; Natural selection; Reinforcement

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; CHEMICAL ECOLOGY; MATE RECOGNITION; NATURAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; WILD ANIMAL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, WILD; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC DRIFT; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA BIRCHII; DROSOPHILA SERRATA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 0037326829     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/345783     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie III, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2001. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112/113:33-43.
2. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140(suppl.):S85-S107.
4. Arnold, S. J., and P. C. Phillips. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53:1516-1527.
5. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112/113:9-32.
6. Ayala, F. J. 1965. Sibling species of the Drosophila serrata group. Evolution 19:538-545.
7. Bakker, T. C. M., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. The genetic basis of mate recognition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:129-171.
8. Barton, N. H. 1986. The maintenance of polygenic variation through a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genetical Research 47:209-216.
9. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1987. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research 49:157-173.
10. _. 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annual Review of Genetics 23:337-370.
11. Blows, M. W. 1998. Evolution of a mate recognition system after hybridization between two Drosophila species. American Naturalist 151:538-544.
12. _. 1999. Evolution of the genetic covariance between male and female components of mate recognition: an experimental test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 266:2169-2174.
13. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. American Naturalist 152:826-837.
14. Borhen, B. B., W. G. Hill, and A. Robertson. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses. Genetical Research 7:44-57.
15. Burger, R., and R. Lande. 1994. On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138:901-912.
16. Butlin, R. K. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2:8-13.
17. _. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pages 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
18. Butlin, R. K., and M. G. Ritchie. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:237-246.
19. Butlin, R. K., G. M. Hewitt, and S. F. Webb. 1985. Sexual selection for intermediate optimum in Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Animal Behaviour 33:1281-1292.
20. Camara, M. D., and M. Pigliucci. 1999. Mutational contributions to genetic variance-covariance matrices: an experimental approach using induced mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 53:1692-1703.
21. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:155-171.
22. Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. 3d ed. Columbia University Press, New York.
23. Flury, B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York.
24. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science (Washington, D.C.) 290:519-521.
25. Houle, D., J. Mezey, and P. Galpern. 2002. Interpretation of the results of common principal components analysis. Evolution 56:433-440.
26. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pages 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
27. Keightley, P. D., and W. G. Hill. 1989. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection: sampling variation and response to subsequent directional selection. Genetical Research 54:45-57.
28. Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 267:1649-1655.
29. Krzanowski, W. J. 1979. Between-group comparisons of principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:703-707.
30. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain : body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
31. _. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203-215.
32. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and the analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
33. Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent, and J. M. Bibby. 1979. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press, London.
34. Noor, M. A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
35. _. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503-508.
36. Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species. Pages 21-29 in E. Vrba, ed. Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph 4. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
37. Phillips, P. C. 1998. CPC: common principal components analysis, http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~pphil/software.html. University of Oregon, Eugene.
38. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506-1515.
39. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158: 1137-1145.
40. Pimentel, R. A. 1979. Morphometrics. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.
41. Podolsky, R. H., R. G. Shaw, and F. H. Shaw. 1997. Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. II. Constancy of within-population genetic variance. Evolution 51:1785-1796.
42. Reeve, J. P. 2000. Predicting long-term response to selection. Genetical Research 75:83-94.
43. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93:14628-14631.
44. Roff, D. A. 2000. The evolution of the G matrix. Heredity 84:135-142.
45. Sætre, G.-P., T. Moum, S. Bureš, M. Král, M. Adamjan, and J. Moreno. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-592.
46. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
47. Schott, J. R. 1998. Estimating correlation matrices that have common eigenvectors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 27:445-459.
48. Shaw, F. H., R. G. Shaw, G. S. Wilkinson, and M. Turelli. 1995. Changes in genetic covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49:1260-1267.
49. Slatkin, M., and S. A. Frank. 1990. The quantitative genetic consequences of pleiotropy under stabilizing and directional selection. Genetics 125:207-213.
50. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology 25:138-193.
51. _. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42: 1342-1347.
52. Wilkinson, G. S., K. Fowler, and L. Partridge. 1990. Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44: 1990-2003.
53. Zeng, Z.-B. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42:363-374.