Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits

American Naturalist

Volumn 163, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 329-340

  Blows, Mark W ^a   Chenoweth, Stephen F ^a   Hine, Emma ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fitness surface; Genetic variance; Genetic variance covariance matrix; Lek paradox; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA SERRATA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 1842711883     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/381941     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie III, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2001. Possible consequences of genes of major effect: transient changes in the G-matrix. Genetica 112/113:33-43.
2. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. American Naturalist 140(suppl.):S85-S107.
4. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro-and macroevolution. Genetica 112:9-32.
5. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1987. Adaptive landscapes, genetic distance and the evolution of quantitative characters. Genetical Research 49:157-173.
6. _. 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annual Review of Genetics 23:337-370.
7. Blows, M. W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1113-1118.
8. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. American Naturalist 152:826-837.
9. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring nonlinear selection. American Naturalist 162:815-820.
10. Blows, M. W., and M. Higgie. 2003. Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection. American Naturalist 161:240-253.
11. Blows, M. W., R. Brooks, and P. G. Kraft. 2003. Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57:622-630.
12. Bohren, B. B., W. G. Hill, and A. Robertson. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses. Genetical Research 7:44-57.
13. Box, G. E. P., and N. R. Draper. 1987. Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York.
14. Brodie, E. D., III. 1992. Correlational selection for the colour pattern and antipreditor behaviour in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46:1284-1298.
15. Brodie, E. D., III, A. J. Moore, and F. J. Janzen. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:313-318.
16. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55:1002-1015.
17. Bulmer, M. G. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon, Oxford.
18. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:155-171.
19. Cohn, R. D. 1999. Comparisons of multivariate relational structures in serially correlated data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 4:238-257.
20. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
21. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
22. Flury, B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York.
23. Hall, D. W., M. Kirkpatrick, and B. West. 2001. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected. Evolution 54:1862-1869.
24. Hall, P., and S. R. Wilson. 1991. Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing. Biometrics 47:757-762.
25. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
26. Hine, E., M. Higgie, S. Lachish, and M. W. Blows. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:2215-2219.
27. Howard, R. W., L. L. Jackson, H. Banse, and M. W. Blows. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:961-976.
28. Keightley, P. D., and W. G. Hill. 1989. Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection: sampling variation and response to subsequent directional selection. Genetical Research 54:45-57.
29. Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:43-70.
30. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
31. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684-686.
32. Krzanowski, W. J. 1979. Between-group comparisons of principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:703-707.
33. _. 1988. Principles of multivariate analysis: a user's perspective. Clarendon, Oxford.
34. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
35. _. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203-215.
36. _. 1984. The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genetical Research 44:309-320.
37. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
38. Nelson, D. R. 1993. Methyl-branched lipids in insects. Pages 271-315 in D. W. Stanley-Samuelson and D. R. Nelson, eds. Insect lipids: chemistry, biochemistry and biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
39. Orr, H. A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
40. Orr, H. A., and J. A. Coyne. 1992. The genetics of adaptation revisited. American Naturalist 140:725-742.
41. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
42. _. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506-1515.
43. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158:1137-1145.
44. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 260:21-29.
45. Reeve, J. P. 2000. Predicting long-term response to selection. Genetical Research 75:83-94.
46. Ritchie, M. G. 1996. The shape of female mating preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93:14628-14631.
47. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:1415-1421.
48. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
49. Shaw, F. H., R. G. Shaw, G. S. Wilkinson, and M. Turelli. 1995. Changes in genetic covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49:1260-1267.
50. Slatkin, M., and S. A. Frank. 1990. The quantitative genetic consequences of pleiotropy under stabilizing and directional selection. Genetics 125:207-213.
51. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:320-327.
52. Strang, G. 1998. Introduction to linear algebra. 2d ed. Wellesley-Cambridge, Wellesley.
53. Turelli, M. 1984. Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology 25:138-193.
54. _. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
55. Turner, G. F. 1995. The lek paradox resolved? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:473-474.