Evolution of a mate recognition system after hybridization between two Drosophila species

American Naturalist

Volumn 151, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 538-544

  Blows, Mark W ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drosophila birchii; Drosophila serrata; Genetic correlation; Hybridization; Pleiotropy; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETIC CORRELATION; HYBRIDIZATION; MATE RECOGNITION SYSTEM; MATING SYSTEM; PLEIOTROPY;

EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MATE RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031799901     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286139     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ayala, F. J. 1965. Sibling species of the Drosophila serrata group. Evolution 19:538-545.
2. Bakker, T. C. M., and A. Pomiankowski. 1995. The genetic basis of mate recognition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:129-171.
3. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1991. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127:229-255.
4. Butlin, R., and M. G. Richie. 1989. Genetic coupling in mate recognition systems: what is the evidence? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:237-246.
5. Boake, C. R. B. 1991. Coevolution of senders and receivers of sexual signals: genetic coupling and genetic correlations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6:225-227.
6. Dobzhansky, T., and W. B. Mather. 1961. The evolutionary status of Drosophila serrata. Evolution 15:461-467.
7. Endler, J. A., and A. E. Houde. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
8. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2d ed. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, England.
9. Kearsey, M. J., and H. S. Pooni. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
10. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
11. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78:3721-3725.
12. Pomiankowski, A., and Y. Iwasa. 1993. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 253:173-181.
13. Pomiankowski, A., and L. Sheridan. 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:242-244.
14. Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa, and S. Nee. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preference. I. Fisher and the biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
15. Roff, D. A. 1996. The evolution of genetic correlations: an analysis of patterns. Evolution 50:1392-1403.
16. Simons, A. M., and D. A. Roff. 1996. The effect of a variable environment on the genetic correlation structure in a field cricket. Evolution 50:267-275.
17. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. 2d ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
18. Toolson, E. C., and R. Kuper-Simbron. 1989. Laboratory evolution of epicuticular hydrocarbon composition and cuticular permeability in Drosophila pseudoobscura: effects on sexual dimorphism and thermal-acclimation ability. Evolution 43:468-473.
19. Via, S. 1984. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlation in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution 38:896-905.
20. Wallace, B., M. W. Timm, and M. P. P. Strambi. 1983. The establishment of novel mate-recognition systems in introgressive hybrid Drosophila populations. Evolutionary Biology 16:467-488.
21. Wu, C.-I., H. Hollocher, D. J. Begun, C. F. Aquadro, Y. Xu, and M.-L. Wu. 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92:2519-2523.