Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: Genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2754-2762

  Hine, Emma ^a   Chenoweth, Stephen F ^a   Blows, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Condition dependence; Genetic variance covariance matrix; Genic capture; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA SERRATA; DROSOPHILIDAE;

EID: 11444253710     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01627.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know? Annu. Rev. Genet. 23:337-370.
4. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152:826-837.
5. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring non-linear selection. Am. Nat. 162:815-820.
6. Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:329-340.
7. Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Pp. 19-80 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
8. Bowerman, B. L., and R. T. O'Connell. 1990. Linear statistical models: an applied approach. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
9. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (foecilia reticulata). Evolution 55:1002-1015.
10. Charlesworth, B. 1990. Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution 44:520-538.
11. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57:2326-2334.
12. Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:771-783.
13. David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2000. Condition-dependent signaling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406:186-188.
14. Draper, N. R., and J. A. John. 1988. Response-surface designs for quantitative and qualitative variables. Technometrics 30:423-428.
15. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2d ed. Longman, London.
17. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
18. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
19. Hine, E., S. Lachish, M. Higgie, and M. W. Blows. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269:2215-2219.
20. Hoffmann, A. A. 2000. Laboratory and field heritabilites: some lessions from Drosophila. Pp. 200-218 in T. A. Mousseau, B. Sinervo, and J. A. Endler, eds. Adaptive genetic variation in the wild. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Hoikkala, A., and S. Crossley. 2000. Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: behaviour and songs in D. birchii and D. serrata. J. Insect Behav. 13:71-87.
22. Holzer, B., A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol. 14:353-359.
23. Houle, D. 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45:630-648.
24. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
25. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
26. Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684-686.
27. Kruuk, L. E. B., J. Slate, J. M. Pemberton, S. Brotherstone, F. Guinness, and T. Clutton-Brock. 2002. Antler size in red deer: heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution 56:1683-1695.
28. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
29. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
30. Lorch, P. D., S. Proulx, L. Rowe, and T. Day. 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5:867-881.
31. Neale, M. C., and L. R. Cardon. 1992. Methodology for genetic study of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
32. Neale, M. C., and M. B. Miller. 1997. The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models. Behav. Genet. 27:113-120.
33. Neale, M. C., S. M. Boker, G. Xie, H. H. Maes. 2002. Mx: statistical modeling. 6th ed. Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry. Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298.
34. Nelson, D. R. 1993. Methyl-branched lipids in insects. Pp. 271-315 in D. W. Stanley-Samuelson and D. R. Nelson, eds. Insect lipids: chemistry, biochemistry and biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
35. Orr, H. A. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
36. _. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
37. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209-1222.
38. Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 260:21-29.
39. Price, T., and D. Schluter. 1991. On the low heritability of life-history traits. Evolution 45:853-861.
40. Rantala, M. J., R. Kortet, J. S. Kotiaho, A. Vainikka, and J. Suhonen. 2003. Condition dependence of pheromones and immune function in the grain beetle Tenebrio molitor. Funct. Ecol. 17: 534-540.
41. Reeve, J. P. 2000. Predicting long-term response to selection. Genet. Res. 75:83-94.
42. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
43. Riska, B., T. Prout, and M. Turelli. 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics 123: 865-871.
44. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:1415-1421.
45. Scheuber, H. A. Jacot, and M. W. G. Brinkhof. 2003. The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270:1779-1784.
46. Schluter, D., and D. Nychka. 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. Am. Nat. 143:596-616.
47. Sgrö, C. M., and A. A. Hoffmann. 1998. Heritable variation for fecundity in field-collected Drosophila melanogaster and their offspring reared under different environmental temperatures. Evolution 52:134-143.
48. Strang, G. 1998. Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Wellesley, MA.
49. Taylor, P. D., and G. C. Williams. 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22:392-409.
50. Wilkinson, G. S., and M. Taper. 1999. Evolution of genetic variation for condition-dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 266:1685-1690.