(iv) Computer-assisted knee replacement techniques

Current Orthopaedics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 200-206

  Kluge, Wolfram H ^a  

^a BRADFORD ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted knee replacement; Electromagnetic tracking; Implant alignment; Navigation; Soft tissue balance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFRARED RADIATION; LABORATORY TEST; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 34548127690     PISSN: 02680890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cuor.2006.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Sparmann M., Wolke B., Czupalla H., Banzer D., and Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Jt Surg 85-B (2003) 830-835
2. Dorr L.D., and Boiardo R.A. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205 (1997) 5-11
3. Teter K.E., Bregman D., and Colwell Jr. C.W. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 321 (1995) 106-110
4. Feng E.L., Stulberg S.D., and Wixson R.L. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop 229 (1994) 60-71
5. Laskin R.S. Total condylar knee replacement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg 72-A (1990) 529-535
6. Piazza S.J., Delp S.L., Stulberg S.D., and Stern S.H. Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study. J Orthop Res 16 (1998) 264-270
7. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., and Meding J.B. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299 (1994) 153-156
8. Garg A., and Walker P.S. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. J Biomech 23 (1990) 45-58
9. Jeffery R.S., Morris R.W., and Denham R.A. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 73-B (1991) 709-714
10. Stockl B., Nogler M., Rosiek R., Fischer M., Krismer M., and Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 426 (2004) 180-186
11. Bargren J.H., Blaha J.D., and Freeman M.A.R. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: correlated biomechanical and clinical investigations. Clin Orthop 173 (1983) 178-183
12. Oswald M.H., Jakob R.P., Schneider E., and Hoogewoud H.M. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8 (1993) 419-426
13. Wasielewski R.C., Galante J.O., Leighty R., Natarajan R.N., and Rosenberg A.G. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299 (1994) 31-43
14. Stulberg S.D., Loan P., and Sarin V. Computer assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Jt Surg 84-A Suppl 2 (2002) 90-98
15. Matsen III F.A., Garbini J.L., Sidles J.A., Pratt B., Baumgarten D., and Kaiura R. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296 (1993) 178-186
16. Stulberg S.D., Picard F., and Saragaglia D. Computer assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Op Tech Orthop 10 (2000) 25-39
17. Jerosch J., Filler T., and Peuker E. Ausmaß der interindividuellen Variationsbreite bei der intraopertiven Bestimmung der interepicondylären Achse in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopädische Praxis 37 (2001) 293-297
18. Holt G., and Gregori A.G. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty is here today. BMJ 330 (2005) 197
19. Bäthis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Lüring C., Zurakowski D., and Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of computer assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Jt Surg 86-B (2004) 682-687
20. Perlick L., Bäthis H., Tingart M., Perlick C., and Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty. CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 464-470
21. Jenny JY, Mielke RK, Kohler S, Kiefer H, et al. Total knee prosthesis implantation with a non image-based navigation system: a multicentric analysis. In: Proceedings of the 70th annual meeting AAOS, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2003. p. 96.
22. Oberst M., Bertsch C., Wurstlin S., and Holz U. CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective and randomized study. Unfallchirurg 106 (2003) 941-948
23. Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., and Beaver R.J. Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Jt Surg 86-B (2004) 372-377
24. Beaver R.J., Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., and Sikorski J.M. A prospective randomized controlled trial of computer assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Proc 86-B (2004) 475
25. Haaker R.G., Stockheim M., Kamp M., Proff G., Breitenfelder J., and Ottersbach A. Computer assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 (2005) 152-159
26. Stulberg D.S. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?. Clin Orthop 416 (2003) 177-184
27. Matsumoto T., Tsumura N., Kurosaka M., et al. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28 (2004) 282-285
28. Victor J., and Hoste D. Image-based computer assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop 428 (2004) 131-139
29. Chin P.L., Yang K.Y., Yeo S.J., and Lo N.N. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 618-626
30. Kim S.J., MacDonald M., Hernandez J., and Wixson R.L. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment. J Arthroplasty 20 Suppl (2005) 123-131
31. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., and Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 20 Suppl (2005) 132-138
32. Sikorski J.M. Computer assisted revision total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg 86-B (2004) 510-514
33. Perlick L., Bäthis H., Lerch K., Luring C., Tingart M., and Grifka J. Navigated implantation of total knee endoprostheses in secondary knee osteoarthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients as compared to conventional technique. Z Rheumatol 63 (2004) 140-146
34. Fehring TK, Mason JB, Moskal J, Pollock DC, Mann J, Williams VJ. When computer assisted knee replacement is the best alternative. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; Aug 3: electronic publication ahead of print.
35. Jakopec M., Harris S.J., Rodriguez y Baena F., Gomes P., Cobb J., et al. The first clinical application of a "hands-on" robotic knee surgery system. Comput Aided Surg 6 (2001) 329-339
36. Shi F., Zhang J., Liu Y., and Zhao Z. A hand-eye robotic model for total knee replacement surgery. Int Conf Med Image Comput Assist Interv 8 (2005) 122-130
37. Siebert W., Mai S., Kober R., and Heeckt P.F. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 9 (2002) 173-180
38. Jenny J.Y., Boeri C., and Ballonzoli L. Coronal alignment of the lower limb. Acta Orthop 76 (2005) 403-407
39. Swanson K.E., Stocks G.W., Warren P.D., Hazel M.R., and Janssen H.F. Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs?. Clin Orthop 371 (2000) 246-252
40. Jenny J.Y., and Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 74-77
41. Berger R.A., Crossett L.S., Jacobs J.J., and Rubash H.E. Malrotation causing patello-femoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356 (1998) 144-153
42. Miller M.C., Berger R.A., Petrella A.J., Karmas A., and Rubash H.E. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 (2001) 38-45
43. Singerman R., Pagan H.D., Peyser A.B., and Goldberg V.M. Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Clin Orthop Relat Res 334 (1997) 345-353
44. Siston R., Patel J.J., Goodman S.B., Delp S.L., and Giori N.J. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg 87-B (2005) 2276-2280
45. Yau W.P., Leung A., Chiu K.Y., Tang W.M., and Ng T.P. Intra-observer errors in identification of visually selected anatomic landmarks in non-image-based computer navigation total knee replacement system. A J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 591-601
46. Delp S.L., Stulberg D.S., Davies B., Picard F., and Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop 354 (1998) 49-56
47. Kalairajah Y., Cossey A.J., Verrall G.M., Ludbrook G., and Spriggins A.J. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Jt Surg 88-B (2006) 198-202
48. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., and Sikorski J.M. Computer assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (The Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Jt Surg 86-B (2004) 818-823
49. Sikorski J.M., and Chauhan S. Aspects of current management. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery: Do we need CAOS?. J Bone Jt Surg 85-B (2003) 319-323
50. Swank M.L. Orthopaedic navigation solutions. Computer assisted surgery/orthopaedic navigation in total joint reconstruction. US Muscoloskeletal Rev (2006) 85-87